Craniofacial microsomia (CFM) is a broad clinical term used to describe a congenital condition most commonly involving the underdevelopment of the external ear, mandible, soft tissues, and facial nerve. Despite medical advances, understanding of the psychological health and healthcare experiences of individuals with CFM and their caregivers remains limited. This article describes a research program designed to address these knowledge gaps, and identify opportunities for psychosocial intervention and improved healthcare provision.
Design
The Craniofacial microsomia: Accelerating Research and Education (CARE) research program aims to: 1) Conduct up to 160 narrative interviews with individuals and caregivers to validate a conceptual framework; 2) Administer an online international survey of up to 800 individuals with CFM and caregivers to identify predictors of psychological distress; 3) Perform up to 60 semi-structured interviews with healthcare providers and advocacy leaders to examine the extent to which current healthcare provisions address identified patient needs; and 4) Establish a participant registry to build a longitudinal database and develop an international community.
Results
Teams in the USA and UK have been established, alongside an international, interdisciplinary Advisory Committee. Data analysis for Aim 1 is ongoing and informing the delivery of Aims 2-3. Aim 4 is also in development. A dedicated website serves as a recruitment tool, educational resource, and mechanism for engaging with the CFM community.
Conclusions
The CARE program provides a comprehensive approach to understanding the experiences of individuals with CFM and their caregivers. Challenges encountered and lessons learned are shared for the benefit of the community.
HeikeCLHingAVAspinallCA, et al. Clinical care in craniofacial microsomia: a review of current management recommendations and opportunities to advance research. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet.2013;163C(4):271‐282. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.31373
LuquettiDVLeonciniEMastroiacovoP. Microtia-anotia: a global review of prevalence rates. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol.2011;91(9):813‐822.
4.
LuquettiDVHeikeCLHingAVCunninghamMLCoxTC. Microtia: epidemiology and genetics. Am J Med Genet A.2012;158A(1):124‐139.
5.
Kuu-KarkkuLSuominenASvedström-OristoA. Craniofacial microsomia – more than a structural malformation. Orthod Craniofac Res.2022; 26(1):117‐122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12592
6.
BarisicIOdakLLoaneM, et al. Prevalence, prenatal diagnosis and clinical features of oculo-auriculo-vertebral spectrum: a registry-based study in Europe. Eur J Hum Genet.2014;22(8):1026‐1033.
7.
RenkemaRWCaronC. J. J. M.PauwsE, et al. Extracraniofacial anomalies in craniofacial microsomia: retrospective analysis of 991 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg.2019;48(9):1169‐1176. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2019.01.031
8.
HorganJEPadwaBLLaBrieRAMullikenJB. OMENS-Plus: analysis of craniofacial and extracraniofacial anomalies in hemifacial microsomia. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1995;32(5):405‐412.
9.
Martinez PlazaAPerez de Perceval TaraM.Marin FernandezAB, et al. Bilateral auricular reconstruction with osseointegrated implant-retained prostheses. Optimization of aesthetic outcomes using virtual planning. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg.2019;120(6):579-583. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2019.02.003
10.
KayaOPluijmersBIStaalF, et al. Describing the mandible in patients with craniofacial microsomia based on principal component analysis and thin plate spline video analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg.2019;48(3):302‐308.
11.
PostaBJarabinJAPerenyiA, et al. Pediatric hearing rehabilitation with the Baha(R) attract implant system. Orv Hetil.2017;158(8):304‐310.
12.
JohnsALStockNMCostaBBillaud FeragenKCrerandCE. Psychosocial and health-related experiences of individuals with microtia and craniofacial microsomia and their families: narrative review over 2 decades. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2022 (online first):10556656221091699. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656221091699
13.
RumseyNHarcourtD. The Oxford Handbook of the Psychology of Appearance. Oxford University Press; 2012.
14.
HorlockNVogelinEBradburyETGrobbelaarAOGaultDT. Psychosocial outcome of patients after ear reconstruction: a retrospective study of 62 patients. Ann Plast Surg.2005;54(5):517‐524.
15.
JohnsALLuquettiDVHeikeCL, et al. Parental reports of intervention services and prevalence of teasing in a multinational craniofacial microsomia pediatric study. J Craniofac Surg.2021;32(8):2687‐2691. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000007999
16.
LuquettiDVSpeltzMLWallaceER, et al. Methods and challenges in a cohort study of infants and toddlers with craniofacial microsomia: the clock study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2019;56(7):877-889. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665618821014
17.
CollettBRWallaceERKapp-SimonKA, et al. Cognitive, motor and language development of preschool children with craniofacial microsomia. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2021;58(9):1169‐1177.
18.
HamiltonKVOrmondKEMoscarelloT, et al. Exploring the medical and psychosocial concerns of adolescents and young adults with craniofacial microsomia. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2018;55(10):1430‐1439. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665618768542
19.
CollettBRChapmanKWallaceER, et al. Speech, language, and communication skills of adolescents with craniofacial microsomia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol.2019;28(4):1571‐1581.
20.
NuyenBAKandathilCKSaltychevMFirminFMostSPTruongMT. The social perception of microtia and auricular reconstruction. Laryngoscope.2021;131(1):195‐200. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28619
21.
AlmadaniYHGilardinoMS. Cost-effectiveness analysis, psychosocial, and utility outcomes of early mandibular distraction in craniofacial microsomia. J Craniofac Surg.2020;31(7):1888‐1894.
22.
FeragenKBStockNM. Psychological adjustment to craniofacial conditions (excluding oral clefts): a review of the literature. Psychol Health.2017;32(3):253‐288. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2016.1247838
23.
KaelinVCWallaceERWerlerMMCollettBRKhetaniMA. Community participation in youth with craniofacial microsomia. Disabil Rehabil.2022;44(2):253‐260. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1765031
24.
DuftonLMSpeltzMLKellyJPLerouxBCollettBRWerlerMM. Psychosocial outcomes in children with hemifacial microsomia. J Pediatr Psychol.2011;36(7):794‐805.
25.
WallaceERCollettBRHeikeCLWerlerMMSpeltzML. Behavioral-Social adjustment of adolescents with craniofacial microsomia. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2018;55(5):664‐675. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665617750488
26.
HamletCHarcourtD. Exploring the experiences of adults with microtia: a qualitative study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2020;57:1230‐1237.
27.
StockNMFeragenKBRumseyN. “It doesn't all just stop at 18": psychological adjustment and support needs of adults born with cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2015;52(5):543‐554.
28.
ArdouinKHottonMStockNM. Interpersonal relationship experiences in adults born with cleft lip and/or palate: a whole of life survey in the United Kingdom. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2021;58(11):1412‐1421.
29.
ChristensenKJuelKHerskindAMMurrayJC. Long-term follow-up study of survival associated with cleft lip and palate at birth. Br Med J.2004;328(7453):1405.
30.
CollettBRSpeltzMLCloonanYKLerouxBGKellyJPWerlerMM. Neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with hemifacial microsomia. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.2011;165(2):134‐140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.271
31.
SpeltzMLWallaceERCollettBRHeikeCLLuquettiDVWerlerMM. Intelligence and academic achievement of adolescents with craniofacial microsomia. Plast Reconstr Surg.2017;140(3):571‐580. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003584
32.
KancherlaVRomittiPADamianoPCDruschelCMRobbinsJM. Maternal reports of satisfaction with care and outcomes for children with microtia. Plast Reconstr Surg.2009;123:149e‐150e.
33.
KaelinVCWallaceERWerlerMMCollettBRRosenbergJKhetaniMA. Caregiver perspectives on school participation among students with craniofacial microsomia. Am J Occup Ther.2021;75(2):7502205100p1‐7502205100p10. doi:https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2021.041277
34.
KesserBWKrookKGrayLC. Impact of unilateral conductive hearing loss due to aural atresia on academic performance in children. Laryngoscope.2013;123:2270‐2275.
SmitALBurgersYRWSwanenburg de VeyeH. F. N.StegemanIBreugemCC. Hearing-related quality of life, developmental outcomes and performance in children and young adults with unilateral conductive hearing loss due to aural atresia. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.2021. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110590
37.
MyhreARabuMFeragenKJB. The need to belong: subjective experiences of living with a craniofacial conditions and undergoing appearance-altering surgery. Body Image.2021;38:334‐345.
38.
FanYNiuXChenYPingLYangTChenX. Long-term evaluation of development in patients with bilateral microtia using softband bone conducted hearing devices. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.2020;138:110367.
39.
FanYWangYWangPChenYZhuYChenX. Aesthetic and hearing rehabilitation in patients with bilateral microtia-atresia. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.2017;101:150‐157.
40.
SoukupBMashhadiSABulstrodeNW. Health-related quality-of-life assessment and surgical outcomes for auricular reconstruction using autologous costal cartilage. Plast Reconstr Surg.2012;129(3):632‐640. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182402ca7
41.
SchrötzlmairFGötzKPatscheiderMHempelJ. Outcome of auricular reconstruction with porous polyethylene frameworks: our 10 years of experience with 113 children and adults. Facial Plast Surg.2021; 38(03):221‐227. doi:https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731070
42.
LuquettiDVBrajcichMRStockNMHeikeCLJohnsAL. Healthcare and psychosocial experiences of individuals with craniofacial microsomia: patient and caregivers perspectives. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.2018;107:164‐175.
43.
JohnsALLuquettiDVBrajcichMRHeikeCLStockNM. In their own words: caregiver and patient perspectives on stressors, resources, and recommendations in craniofacial microsomia care. J Craniofac Surg.2018;29(8):2198‐2205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004867
44.
van Hövell Tot WesterflierClaire V. A.StegemanIMuradinMSMSmitALBreugemCC. Parental preferences for the first consultation for microtia. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.2018;106:10‐15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.12.033
45.
JohnsALImDDLewinSL. Early familial experiences with microtia: psychosocial implications for pediatric providers. Clin Pediatr (Phila).2018;57(7):775‐782.
46.
RobertsRMShuteR. Children's experience of living with a craniofacial condition: perspectives of children and parents. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry.2011;16(3):317‐334. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104509355021
47.
NelsonPACaressALGlennyAMKirkSA. ‘Doing the “right” thing’: how parents experience and manage decision-making for children’s ‘normalising’ surgeries. Social Science Med.2012;74(5):796‐804.
48.
FeragenKBStockNMMyhreADue-TønnessenBJ. Medical stress reactions and personal growth in parents of children with a rare craniofacial condition. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2020;57(2):228‐237.
49.
FeragenKJBMyhreAStockNM. “Will you still feel beautiful when you find out you are different?": parents’ experiences, reflections, and appearance-focused conversations about their child's visible difference. Qual Health Res.2022;32(1):3‐15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323211039205
50.
SangerCIlesJEAndrewCSRamchandaniPG. Associations between postnatal maternal depression and psychological outcomes in adolescent offspring: a systematic review. Arch Womens Ment Health.2015;18(2):147‐162.
51.
RenkemaRW, ERN CRANIO working group on craniofacial microsomia. European guideline craniofacial microsomia. J Craniofac Surg.2020;31Suppl 8:2385‐2484.
MazeedASSaiedSAbulezzTYoussefGBulstrodeNW. Recommendations for the development and reform of microtia and atresia services. J Craniofac Surg.2019;30(4):1135‐1139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000005209
54.
UmbaughHMCrerandCEStockNM, et al. Microtia and craniofacial microsomia: content analysis of Facebook groups. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.2020;138:110301. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110301
StockNMFeragenKB. Psychological adjustment to cleft lip and/or palate: a narrative review of the literature. Psychol Health.2016;31(7):777‐813.
57.
StockNMFeragenKBMossTPRumseyN. Toward a conceptual and methodological shift in craniofacial research. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2018;55(1):105‐111. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665617721925
58.
SpeltzMLRichmanL. Progress and limitations in the psychological study of craniofacial anomalies. J Ped Psychol.1997;22(4):433‐438.
59.
FeragenKBStockNMSharrattNDKvalemIL. Self-perceptions of romantic appeal in adolescents with a cleft lip and/or palate. Body Image.2016;18:143‐152. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.06.009
60.
Wong-RiffKWYTsangarisEGoodacreTEE, et al. What matters to patients with cleft lip and/or palate: an international qualitative study informing the development of the cleft-Q. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2018;53(3):442‐450. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665617732854
61.
ArdouinKHareJStockNM. Emotional wellbeing in adults born with cleft lip and/or palate: a whole of life survey in the United Kingdom. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2020;57(7):877‐885.
62.
StockNMZucchelliFHammondVHudsonNSellD. Facilitators and barriers to delivering an optimal specialist service in the United Kingdom: an example from cleft lip and palate care. Br J Healthcare Manage.2022. doi:https://doi.org/10.12968/bjhc.2021.0051
AdamAPCurryCJHallJGKeppler-NoreuilKMAdamMPDobynsWB. Recurrent constellations of embryonic malformations re-conceptualized as an overlapping group of disorders with shared pathogenesis. Am J Med Genet A.2020;182(11):2646‐2661. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.61847
66.
Ellard-GrayAJeffreyNKChoubakNCrannSE. Finding the hidden participant: solutions for recruiting hidden, hard-to-reach, and vulnerable populations. Int J Qual Methods.2015:1‐10.
67.
DaviesARandallD. Perceptions of children’s participation in their healthcare: a critical review. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs.2015;38(3):202‐221.
68.
SecintiEThompsonEJRichardsMGaysinaD. Childhood chronic physical illness and adult emotional health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Child Psychol Psychiatr.2017;58(7):753‐769.
69.
StraussRPBroderH. Directions and issues in psychosocial research and methods as applied to cleft lip and palate and craniofacial anomalies. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1991;28:150‐156.
70.
NelsonPA. Qualitative approaches in craniofacial research. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2009;46(3):245‐251.
FeragenKBStockNMRumseyN. Toward a reconsideration of inclusion and exclusion criteria in cleft lip and palate: implications for psychological research. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2014;51(5):569‐578.
