Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective

Taking advantage of the broad coverage of Wireless Application Protocol (WAP), we developed a Content Management System (CMS)-programmed mobile learning application. This application can help the undergraduate to obtain a comprehensive understanding of concepts in Cleft lip and palate Phenotype, and Embryonic development (CPE). The present study aims to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of the concept acquisition teaching model on the basis of WAP in a practical undergraduate course of CPE.

Design

The concept acquisition teaching model based on WAP was programmed by CMS, covering definitions of various cleft lip and palate, the mechanisms underlying the phenotypes, practical medical cases, as well as corresponding tests after learning.

Setting

The CPE concept acquisition teaching model was distributed to a total of 524 undergraduate students and 46 tutors participated in CPE teaching from seven highly ranked schools of stomatology in China since April 2022.

Participants

524 undergraduate students and 46 tutors from seven highly ranked schools of stomatology in China.

Interventions

The CPE concept acquisition teaching model.

Main outcome measures

The effectiveness of the CPE teaching model.

Results

The response rate to the survey was 100%. The grading of the questionnaires indicated that the students were satisfied with the usability, practicality, and outcome, whereas the tutors were more positive with the contents, cooperation, and outcome.

Conclusions

The present study demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy of the WAP-based concept acquisition teaching model of CPE and a high level of satisfaction among undergraduate students and tutors who major in Stomatology.

Keywords

concept acquisition stomatology teaching model undergraduate education cleft lip and palate embryonic development

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

, et al. The current situation and future prospects of simulators in dental education. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(4):e23635.

Swanson

Stevenson

. Standards-based reform in practice: Evidence on state policy and classroom instruction from the NAEP state assessments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 2002;24(1):1-27.

Allori

Mulliken

Meara

Shusterman

Marcus

. Classification of cleft lip/palate: Then and now. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017;54(2):175-188.

Kousa

Schutte

. Toward an orofacial gene regulatory network. Developmental Dynamics : An Official Publication Of The American Association of Anatomists. 2016;245(3):220-232.

Bush

Jiang

. Palatogenesis: Morphogenetic and molecular mechanisms of secondary palate development. Research support, N I H, extramural review. Development. 2012;139(2):231-243.

Ozdalga

Ahuja

. The smartphone in medicine: A review of current and potential use among physicians and students. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2012;14(5):e128.

Berkhout

. Use of smartphones for early detection of melanoma. Systematic review. Exercer-La Revue Francophone De Medecine Generale. 2018;20(4):472-473.

Zhang

. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (8th Edition). China: People’s Medical Publishing House. 2020.

McKeever

. Understanding web content management systems: Evolution, lifecycle and market. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 2003;103(8–9):686-692.

10.

Dixon

Marazita

Beaty

Murray

. Cleft lip and palate: Understanding genetic and environmental influences. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(3):167-178.

11.

Allori

Cragan

Cassell

Marcus

. ICD-10 Based expanded code set for use in cleft lip/palate research and surveillance. Birth Defects Research Part a-Clinical and Molecular Teratology. 2016;106(11):905-914.

12.

Rodrigues

Fernandes

Monteiro

, et al. SPINA Classification of cleft lip and palate: A suggestion for a complement. Archives de Pediatrie : Organe Officiel de la Societe Francaise de Pediatrie. 2018;25(7):439-441.

13.

Nasreddine

El Hajj

Ghassibe-Sabbagh

. Orofacial clefts embryology, classification, epidemiology, and genetics. Mutation Research Reviews In Mutation Research. 2021;787:108373.

14.

Leslie

Marazita

. Genetics of cleft lip and cleft palate. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C-Seminars in Medical Genetics. 2013;163(4):246-258.

15.

Deshpande

Goudy

. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of cleft palate development. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology. 2019;4(1):160-164.

16.

Šilar

Polák

Mládek

, et al. Development of in-browser simulators for medical education: Introduction of a novel software toolchain. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(7):e14160.

17.

M-G

C-H

L-T

T-C

Kwan

C-Y

. Dental and medical Students’ perspectives on early exposure to PBL in Taiwan. J Dent Educ. 2012;76(6):746-751.

18.

Bengston

Cohen

SJ.

Concept-Acquisition and the perception of meaning. Contemp Educ Psychol. 1979;4(4):348-365.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

A WAP-Based Concept Acquisition Teaching Model in Cleft Lip and Palate Phenotype and Embryonic Development: Functionality and Usability Study