Traditional imaging modalities used to assess velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) do not allow for direct visualization of underlying velopharyngeal (VP) structures and musculature which could impact surgical planning. This limitation can be overcome via structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the only current imaging tool that provides direct visualization of salient VP structures. MRI has been used extensively in research; however, it has had limited clinical use. Factors that restrict clinical use of VP MRI include limited access to optimized VP MRI protocols and uncertainty regarding how to interpret VP MRI findings. The purpose of this paper is to outline a framework for establishing a novel VP MRI scan protocol and to detail the process of interpreting scans of the velopharynx at rest and during speech tasks. Additionally, this paper includes common scan parameters needed to allow for visualization of velopharynx and techniques for the elicitation of speech during scans.
PerryJLKollaraLKuehnDPSuttonBPFangX. Examining age, sex, and race characteristics of velopharyngeal structures in 4- to 9-year-old children using magnetic resonance imaging. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018;55(1):21‐34.
2.
PerryJLKuehnDPSuttonBPFangX. Velopharyngeal structural and functional assessment of speech in young children using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017;54(4):408‐422.
3.
PerryJLSuttonBPKuehnDPGamageJK. Using MRI for assessing velopharyngeal structures and function. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014;51(4):476‐486.
4.
BeerAJHellerhoffPZimmermannA, et al.Dynamic near-real-time magnetic resonance imaging for analyzing the velopharyngeal closure in comparison with videofluoroscopy. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;20(5):791‐797.
5.
ScottADWylezinskaMBirchMJMiquelME. Speech MRI: morphology and function. Phys Med. 2014;30(6):604‐618.
6.
PerryJLKuehnDPSuttonBP. Morphology of the levator veli palatini muscle using magnetic resonance imaging. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2013;50(1):64‐75.
7.
SilverALNimkinKAshlandJE, et al.Cine magnetic resonance imaging with simultaneous audio to evaluate pediatric velopharyngeal insufficiency. Arch Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2011;137(3):258‐263.
8.
SagarPNimkinK. Feasibility study to assess clinical applications of 3-T cine MRI coupled with synchronous audio recording during speech in evaluation of velopharyngeal insufficiency in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2015;45(2):217‐227.
9.
ScottADBoubertakhRBirchMJMiquelME. Towards clinical assessment of velopharyngeal closure using MRI: evaluation of real-time MRI sequences at 1.5 and 3T. Br J Radiol. 2012;85(1019):e1083‐e1092.
10.
MunnZMoolaSLisyKRiitanoDMurphyF. Claustrophobia in magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiography. 2015;21(2):e59‐e63.
11.
SarjiSAAbdullahBJJKumarGTanAHNarayananP. Failed magnetic resonance imaging examinations due to claustrophobia. Australas Radiol. 1998;42(4):293‐295.
12.
DeweyMSchinkTDeweyCF. Claustrophobia during magnetic resonance imaging: cohort study in over 55,000 patients. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;26(5):1322‐1327.
MasonKN. Magnetic resonance imaging for assessing velopharyngeal function: current applications, barriers, and potential for future clinical translation in the United States. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 10556656221123916. Published online 2022.
17.
XingFJinRGilbertIR, et al.4D Magnetic resonance imaging atlas construction using temporally aligned audio waveforms in speech. J Acoust Soc Am. 2021;150(5):3500‐3508.
18.
FuMBarlazMSHoltropJL, et al.High-frame-rate full-vocal-tract 3D dynamic speech imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2017;77(4):1619‐1629.
19.
BaeYKuehnDPConwayCASuttonBP. Real-time magnetic resonance imaging of velopharyngeal activities with simultaneous speech recordings. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011;48(6):695‐707.
20.
JinRShostedRKXingF, et al.Enhancing linguistic research through 2-mm isotropic 3D dynamic speech magnetic resonance imaging optimized by sparse temporal sampling and low rank reconstruction. Magn Reson Med. 2022:1-13.
21.
PerryJLKuehnDPSuttonBPGamageJKFangX. Anthropometric analysis of the velopharynx and related craniometric dimensions in three adult populations using MRI. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016;53(1):1‐13.
22.
KollaraLPerryJLHudsonS. Racial variations in velopharyngeal and craniometric morphology in children: an imaging study. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016;59(1):27‐38.
23.
TianWRedettRJ. New velopharyngeal measurements at rest and during speech: implications and applications. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20(2):532‐539.
24.
KollaraLBaylisALKirschnerRE, et al.Velopharyngeal structural and muscle variations in children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: an unsedated MRI study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019;56(9):1139‐1148.
25.
KollaraLPerryJL. Effects of gravity on the velopharyngeal structures in children using upright magnetic resonance imaging. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014;51(6):669‐676.
26.
KotlarekKJSitzmanTJWilliamsJLPerryJL. Nonsedated magnetic resonance imaging for visualization of the velopharynx in the pediatric population. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021.10556656211057360. Published online 2021.
27.
HaensslerAEPerryJLMannSAMannRJ. An MRI case study: the anatomic cleft restoration concept utilizing buccal flaps in a primary palatoplasty. FACE. 2021;2(2):174‐178.
28.
KotlarekKJJaskolkaMSFangX, et al. A preliminary study of anatomical changes following the use of a pedicled buccal fat pad flap during primary palatoplasty. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022;59(5):614‐621.
29.
TianWLiYYinH, et al.Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of velopharyngeal motion in Chinese children after primary palatal repair. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21(2):578‐587.
30.
PerryJLHaensslerAEKotlarekKJ, et al. Does the type of MRI sequence influence perceived quality and measurement consistency in investigations of the anatomy of the velopharynx?Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022;59(6):741‐750.
31.
GeorgeTNKotlarekKJKuehnDPSuttonBPPerryJL. Differences in the tensor veli palatini between adults with and without cleft palate using high-resolution 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018;55(5):697‐705.
32.
PerryJLChenJYKotlarekKJ, et al.Morphology of the musculus uvulae in vivo using MRI and 3D modeling among adults with normal anatomy and preliminary comparisons to cleft palate anatomy. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019;56(8):993‐1000.
33.
TerziSBeyazal ÇelikerFÖzgürA, et al.The evaluation of Eustachian tube paratubal structures using magnetic resonance imaging in patients with chronic suppurative otitis media. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 2016;136(7):673‐676.
34.
D’AntonioLLEichenbergBJZimmermanGJ, et al.Radiographic and aerodynamic measures of velopharyngeal anatomy and function following Furlow Z-plasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106(3):539‐549.
35.
HaensslerAEFangXPerryJL. Effective velopharyngeal ratio: a more clinically relevant measure of velopharyngeal function. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020;63(11):3586‐3593.
36.
MishimaKYamadaTSugiiAImuraHSugaharaT. Relationships between nasalance scores and nasopharyngeal shapes in cleft palate patients. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg. 2008;36(1):11‐14.
37.
PerryJLKollaraLSuttonBPKuehnDPFangX. Growth effects on velopharyngeal anatomy from childhood to adulthood. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019;62(3):682‐692.
38.
MaLShiBLiYZhengQ. A preliminary study on the characteristics of the velopharyngeal structures in different-age patients with cleft palate. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24(4):1235‐1238.
39.
SatohKWadaTTachimuraTShibaR. The effect of growth of nasopharyngeal structures in velopharyngeal closure in patients with repaired cleft palate and controls without clefts: a cephalometric study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;40(2):105‐109.
40.
WittPDMarshJLMarty-GramesLMuntzHR. Revision of the failed sphincter pharyngoplasty: an outcome assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96(1):129‐138.
41.
RiskiJERuffGLGeorgiadeGSBarwickWJEdwardsPD. Evaluation of the sphincter pharyngoplasty. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;29(3):254‐261.
42.
CarlisleMPSykesKJSinghalVK. Outcomes of sphincter pharyngoplasty and palatal lengthening for velopharyngeal insufficiency: a 10-year experience. Arch Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2011;137(8):763‐766.
43.
WintersRCarterJGuariscoJL. A novel technique for superior-based pharyngeal flaps: 10-year results with formal speech outcomes assessment. Am J Otolaryngol. 2018;39(2):142‐145.
44.
KollaraLBaylisALKirschnerRE, et al.Interaction of the craniofacial complex and velopharyngeal musculature on speech resonance in children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: an MRI analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021;74(1):174‐182.
45.
ParkMAhnSHJeongJHBaekRM. Evaluation of the levator veli palatini muscle thickness in patients with velocardiofacial syndrome using magnetic resonance imaging. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015;68(8):1100‐1105.
46.
MyungYAhnTKimB-KJeongJHBaekRM. Clinical significance of the levator veli palatini muscle in velocardiofacial syndrome patients: implications in velopharyngeal incompetence and pharyngeal flap surgery. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018;55(4):521‐527.
47.
SchenckGCPerryJLFangX. Normative velopharyngeal data in infants: implications for treatment of cleft palate. J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27(6):1430‐1439.
48.
PerryJLHaensslerAEKotlarekKJ, et al.A midsagittal-view magnetic resonance imaging study of the growth and involution of the adenoid mass and related changes in selected velopharyngeal structures. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022;65(4):1282‐1293.
49.
MasonKNRiskiJEPerryJL. Changes in the height of velopharyngeal closure relative to the cervical spine from infancy through adolescence in patients with cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018;55(4):508‐516.
50.
ChenPKTWuJTChenYRNoordhoffMS. Correction of secondary velopharyngeal insufficiency in cleft palate patients with the Furlow palatoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;94(7):933‐941.
51.
SommerladBCMehendaleFVBirchMJSellDHatteeCHarlandK. Palate re-repair revisited. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2002;39(3):295‐307.
52.
MannRJNeamanKCArmstrongSDEbnerBBajnrauhRNaumS. The double-opposing buccal flap procedure for palatal lengthening. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(6):2413‐2418.
53.
PerryJLMasonKSuttonBPKuehnDP. Can dynamic MRI be used to accurately identify velopharyngeal closure patterns?Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018;55(4):499‐507.
54.
PerkinsJALewisCWGrussJSEblenLESieKC. Furlow palatoplasty for management of velopharyngeal insufficiency: a prospective study of 148 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116(1):72‐80.
55.
GartMSGosainAK. Surgical management of velopharyngeal insufficiency. Clin Plast Surg. 2014;41(2):253‐270.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
