Published literature on children with cleft palate and/or lip (CP + /-L) and CHARGE syndrome (CS) is limited. This study investigated cleft characteristics including surgery, and feeding and communication outcomes in children identified with CP + /-L and CS.
Design
Retrospective cross-sectional review.
Setting
Regional Referral Centre for Paediatric Cleft Surgery.
Patients
All children diagnosed with CP + /-L and CS (based on clinical features and/or CHD7 mutation testing) between 1989–2019.
Main Outcome Measures
Cleft type, timing of CP + /-L repair, reasons for ‘delayed’ repair, feeding methods and communication modality.
Results
Twenty-two children with CP + /-L and CS were identified. Cleft sub-types (%) were: Eleven (50%) had bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP), six (27%) had unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and five (23%) had cleft palate (CP). Cleft repair was delayed compared to protocol care for non-syndromic children with CP + /-L. Median age for lip repair + /- vomerine flap was 9 months (range 4–22 months), and palate repair was 21 months (range 11–40 months). Median age for isolated CP repair was 13 months (range 7–23). Surgery for cardiac anomalies (36%) before cleft repair, and (59%) were classed as having severe systemic disease at the time of cleft surgery. Only 27% of the children in this study had both full oral feeding and verbal communication.
Conclusions
Children with CP + /-L and CS had severe cleft types and complex medical problems leading to delayed cleft surgery. Feeding and speech outcomes were better in the children aged over ten years.
HittnerHHirschNKrehGRudolphA. Colobomatous microphthalmia, heart disease, hearing loss and mental retardation: A syndrome. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1979;16(2):122-128.
3.
BlakeKDDavenportSLHHallBD, et al.Charge association: An update and review for the primary pediatrician. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1998;37(3):159-173.
4.
JanssenNBergmanJEHSwertzMA, et al.Mutation update on the CHD7 gene involved in CHARGE syndrome. Hum Mutat. 2012;33(8):1149-1160.
5.
IssekutzKAGrahamJMPrasadCSmithIMBlakeKD. An epidemiological analysis of CHARGE syndrome: Preliminary results from a Canadian study. Am J Med Genet. 2005;133A(3):309-317.
6.
HarrisJRobertEKällénB. Epidemiology of choanal atresia with special reference to the CHARGE association. Pediatrics. 1997;99(3):363-367.
7.
BergmanJEHJanssenNHoefslootLHJongmansMCJHofstraRMWvan Ravenswaaij-ArtsCMA. CHD7 Mutations and CHARGE syndrome: The clinical implications of an expanding phenotype. J Med Genet. 2011;48(5):334-342.
8.
MorganDBaileyMPhelpsPBellmanSGraceAWyseR. Ear-nose-throat abnormalities in the CHARGE association. Arch Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 1993;119(1):49-54.
TiretLHattonFDesmontsJMVourc’hG. Prediction of outcome of anaesthesia in patients over 40 years: A multifactorial risk index. Stat Med. 1988;7(9):947-954.
11.
Isaac KVGanskeIMRottgersSALimSYMullikenJB. Cleft lip and palate in CHARGE syndrome: Phenotypic features that influence management. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J. 2018;55(3):342-347.
12.
SporikRDinwiddieRWallisC. Lung involvement in the multisystem syndrome CHARGE association. Eur Respir J. 1997;10(6):1354-1355.
13.
AsherBFMcGillTJKaplanLFriedmanEMHealyGB. Airway complications in CHARGE association. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990;116(5):594-595.
14.
WhiteDRGiambraBKHopkinRJDainesCLRutterMJ. Aspiration in children with CHARGE syndrome. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005;69(9):1205-1209.
15.
HardwickeJLandiniGRichardB. Fistula incidence after primary cleft palate repair: A systematic review of the literature. Plast Recon Surg. 2014;134(4):618e-627e.
16.
SalimiNAleksejüunienėJYenELooA. Time trends and determinants of fistula in cleft patients at BC children's hospital, Canada: A retrospective 18–year medical chart audit. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018;55(7):1013-1019.
17.
YangARichardBWillsAMahmoudOSandyJNessA. Closer to the truth on national Fistula prevalence after unilateral complete cleft lip and palate repair? The cleft care UK study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020;57(1):5-13.
18.
MaciverRBaniulyteGO'NeillT, et al.Five-year prospective fistula audit in a single center. TIG training negates consultant learning curve, but surgeons should beware the mid-range palatal defect. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022;75(2):806-810.
19.
VarkeyB. Principles of clinical ethics and their application to practice. Med Princ Pract. 2021;30(1):17-28.
20.
StraussR. Ethical and health policy issues in the treatment of children with major craniofacial deformities. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;29(6):585-590. discussion 570.
21.
HarveyASLeaperPMBankierA. CHARGE Association: Clinical manifestations and developmental outcome. Am J Med Genet. 1991;39(1):48-55.
22.
VerloesA. Updated diagnostic criteria for CHARGE syndrome: A proposal. Am J Med Genet. 2005;133A(3):306-308.
23.
MacdonaldMHudsonABladonARatcliffeEBlakeK. Experiences in feeding and gastrointestinal dysfunction in children with CHARGE syndrome. Am J Med Genet Part A. 2017;173(11):2947-2953.
24.
HartshorneNHudsonAMacCuspieJ, et al.Quality of life in adolescents and adults with CHARGE syndrome. Am J Med Genet Part A. 2016;170(8):2012-2021.
25.
BlakeKDRussell-EggittIMMorganDWRatcliffeJMWyseRKH. Who’s in CHARGE? Multidisciplinary management of patients with CHARGE association. Arch Dis Child. 1990;65(2):217-223.
BlakeKDHudsonAS. Gastrointestinal and feeding difficulties in CHARGE syndrome: A review from head-to-toe. Am J Med Genet Part C Semin Med Genet. 2017;175(4):496-506.
28.
DobbelsteynCPeacockeSDBlakeKCristWRashidM. Feeding difficulties in children with CHARGE syndrome: Prevalence, risk factors, and prognosis. Dysphagia. 2008;23(2):127-135.
29.
HudsonAMacdonaldMFriedmanJNBlakeK. CHARGE syndrome gastrointestinal involvement: From mouth to anus. Clin Genet. 2017;92(1):10-17.
30.
SmithIMNicholsSLIssekutzKBlakeK. Behavioral profiles and symptoms of autism in CHARGE syndrome: Preliminary Canadian epidemiological data. Am J Med Genet. 2005;133A(3):248-256.
31.
HartshorneTSHefnerMADavenportSLH. Behavior in CHARGE syndrome: Introduction to the special topic. Am J Med Genet. 2005;133A(3):228-231.
32.
StrömlandKSjögreenLJohanssonM, et al.CHARGE association in Sweden: Malformations and functional deficits. Am J Med Genet. 2005;133A(3):331-339.
33.
SanlavilleDVerloesA. CHARGE syndrome: An update. Eur J Hum Genet. 2007;15(4):389-399.
34.
HsuPMaAWilsonM, et al.CHARGE syndrome: A review. J Paediatr Child Health. 2014;50(7):504-511.
35.
ZentnerGELaymanWSMartinDMScacheriPC. Molecular and phenotypic aspects of CHD7 mutation in CHARGE syndrome. Am J Med Genet Part A. 2010;152A(3):674-686.
36.
JongmansMCJAdmiraalRJVan Der DonkKP, et al.CHARGE syndrome: The phenotypic spectrum of mutations in the CHD7 gene. J Med Genet. 2005;43(4):306-314.
37.
VesseurALangereisMFreeRSnikAvan Ravenswaaij-ArtsCMylanusE. Influence of hearing loss and cognitive abilities on language development in CHARGE syndrome. Am J Med Genet Part A. 2016;170(8):2022-2030.
38.
ArndtSLaszigRBeckR, et al.Spectrum of hearing disorders and their management in children with CHARGE syndrome. Otol Neurotol. 2010;31(1):67-73.
ThelinJWFussnerJC. Factors related to the development of communication in CHARGE syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 2005;133A(3):282-2290.
41.
SellDMildinhallSAlberyLWillsAKSandyJRNessAR. The Cleft Care UK study. Part 4: Perceptual speech outcomes. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2015;18(Suppl 2):36-46.
