Abstract
Introduction
The aim of the present systematic review was to assess the trends in knowledge, attitude, awareness, and practice among orthodontists regarding the management of patients with cleft lip and/or palate.
Methods
An a priori protocol was developed as per the best practices of evidence-based medicine and registered in Prospero (CRD42022306107). The literature search was conducted electronically, using MeSH-terms, keywords, and Boolean-operators “AND” and “OR” in different combinations in multiple databases and screening of titles and abstracts followed by full-text evaluation was performed. The risk of bias (ROB) was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist.
Results
Five studies were included in the qualitative synthesis and three of them showed a high ROB. When participants were questioned about which other specialists worked in the cleft team in addition to the orthodontists, 84% of them in one study reported it to be general dentists. Furthermore, the absence of an interdisciplinary team was reported in two studies from Africa. When asked about the percentage of their practice devoted to the care of patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) one study reported that 52% of orthodontists had treated <10 such patients in their entire career.
Conclusion
The present systematic review highlights the lack of knowledge and experience among orthodontists and orthodontic residents regarding the management of patients with CLP. Efforts must be made to design validated questionnaires and conduct methodologically sound studies in different geographical locations to develop adequate modules for improving the knowledge of orthodontists in this domain.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
