This study describes primary surgical reconstructions performed for children born with a cleft lip and/or palate (CL ± P) in the United Kingdom (UK).
Design
Data forms completed at the time of surgery included details on timing, technique, and adjuncts used during the operative period. Demographic data on participants were validated via parental questionnaires.
Setting
Data were obtained from the Cleft Collective, a national longitudinal cohort study.
Patients
Between 2015 and 2021, 1782 Cleft Collective surgical forms were included, relating to the primary reconstructions of 1514 individual children.
Results
The median age at primary cheiloplasty was 4.3 months. Unilateral cleft lips (UCL) were reconstructed with an anatomical subunit approximation technique in 53%, whereas bilateral cleft lips (BCL) were reconstructed with a broader range of eponymous techniques. Clefts of the soft palate were reconstructed at a median age of 10.3 months with an intravelar veloplasty in 94% cases. Clefts of the hard palate were reconstructed with a vomer flap in 84% cases in a bimodal age distribution, relating to reconstruction carried out simultaneously with either lip or soft palate reconstruction. Antibiotics were used in 96% of cases, with an at-induction-only regimen used more commonly for cheiloplasties (P < .001) and a 5 to 7-day postoperative regime used more commonly for soft palatoplasties (P < .001). Perioperative steroids were used more commonly in palatoplasties than cheiloplasties (P < .001) but tranexamic acid use was equivalent (P = .73).
Conclusions
This study contributes to our understanding of current cleft surgical pathways in the UK and will provide a baseline for analysis of the effectiveness of utilized protocols.
MosseyPALittleJMungerRGDixonMJShawWC. Cleft lip and palate. Lancet. 2009;374:1773–1785.
3.
BearnDMildinhallSMurphyTMurrayJJSellDShawWC, et al. Cleft lip and palate care in the United Kingdom - The clinical standards advisory group (CSAG) study. Part 4: outcome comparisons, training, and conclusions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001;38:38–43.
4.
ColbertSDGreenBBrennanPAMercerN. Contemporary management of cleft lip and palate in the United Kingdom. Have we reached the turning point?Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;53:594–598.
5.
MarsMAsher-McDadeCBrattstromVDahlEMcWilliamJMolstedK, et al. A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: part 3. Dental arch relationships. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;29:405–408.
6.
MølstedKAsher-McdadeCBrattströmVDahlEMarsMMcWilliamJ, et al. A Six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the Lip and palate: part 2. Craniofacial form and soft tissue profile. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;29:398–404.
7.
PigottRWAlberyEHHathornISAtackNEWilliamsAHarlandK, et al. A comparison of three methods of repairing the hard palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2002;39:383–391.
KatzelEBBasilePKoltzPFMarcusJRGirottoJA. Current surgical practices in cleft care: cleft palate repair techniques and postoperative care. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:899–900.
10.
SlatorRPerisanidouLIWaylenASandyJNessAWillsAK. Range and timing of surgery, and surgical sequences used, in primary repair of complete unilateral cleft lip and palate: the cleft care UK study. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2020;23:166–173.
11.
ThieleOCKreppelMDunscheAEckardtAMEhrenfeldMFleinerBGaßlingVGehrkeGGerressenMGosauM, et al.Current concepts in cleft care: a multicenter analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018;46(4):705–708.
SeifertMDaviesAHardingSMcLeodSWrenY. Intelligibility in 3-year-olds with cleft lip and/or palate using the intelligibility in context scale: findings from the cleft collective cohort study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021;58:1178–1189.
14.
StockNMHumphriesKPourcainBSBaileyMPerssonMHo KM, et al. Opportunities and challenges in establishing a cohort study: an example from cleft lip/palate research in the United Kingdom. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016;53:317–325.
15.
KriensO.Lahshal: a concise documentation system for cleft lip, alveolus and palate diagnoses. In: KriensO, ed. What Is Cleft Lip and Palate? A Multidisciplinary Update Workshop. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 1987:30–34.
GreenlandSSennSJRothmanKJCarlinJBPooleCGoodmanSN, et al. Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations. Eur J Epidemiol. 2016;31:337–350.
18.
KarahaliosABagliettoLCarlinJBEnglishDRSimpsonJA. A review of the reporting and handling of missing data in cohort studies with repeated assessment of exposure measures. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:96.
MillardDRCassisiAWheelerJJ. Designs for correction and camouflage of bilateral clefts of the lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:1609–1623.
28.
MullikenJB. Repair of bilateral complete cleft lip and nasal deformity - state of the art. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000;37:342–347.
29.
SommerladBC. A technique for cleft palate repair. Plast Reconst Surg. 2003a;112:1542–1548.
30.
SommerladBC. The use of the operating microscope for cleft palate repair and pharyngoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003b;112:1540–1541.
31.
AbulezzTElsherbinyAMazeedA. Management of cleft lip and palate in Egypt: a national survey. Indian J Plast Surg. 2018;51:290–295.
32.
FrancoDGonçalvesLFFrancoT. Management of cleft lip and palate in Brazil. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2003;37:272–276.
33.
GopalakrishnaAAgrawalK. A status report on management of cleft lip and palate in India. Indian J Plast Surg. 2010;43:66–75.
34.
LeeTJKimST. A survey of cleft lip and palate management taught in training programs in korea. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2003;40:80–83.
35.
SitzmanTJGirottoJAMarcusJR. Current surgical practices in cleft care: unilateral cleft lip repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:261–270.
36.
TanSPKGreeneAKMullikenJB. Current surgical management of bilateral cleft lip in North America. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:1347–1355.
37.
UchiyamaTYamashitaYSusamiTKochiSSuzukiSTakagiRTachimuraTNakanoYShibuiTMichiK,et al.Primary treatment for cleft lip and/or cleft palate in children in Japan. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012 May;49(3):291–298.
38.
Asher-McDadeCShawWC. Current cleft lip and palate management in the United Kingdom. Br J Plast Surg. 1990;43:318–321.
39.
FitzsimonsKJMukarramSCopleyLPDeaconSAvan der MeulenJH. Centralisation of services for children with cleft lip or palate in england: a study of hospital episode statistics. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:148.
40.
ButterworthSRiversCFullartonMMurphyCBealeVNeil-DwyerJ, et al. A closer Look at delayed primary cleft surgery and unrepaired cleft Lip and/or palate in 5 UK cleft centers. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021. Epub ahead of print.
41.
SellD. Issues in perceptual speech analysis in cleft palate and related disorders: a review. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2005;40:103–121.
42.
KobergWKoblinI. Speech development and maxillary growth in relation to technique and timing of palatoplasty. J Maxillofac Surg. 1973;1:44–50.
43.
LohmanderAFriedeHLiljaJ. Long-term, longitudinal follow-up of individuals with unilateral cleft lip and palate after the gothenburg primary early veloplasty and delayed hard palate closure protocol: speech outcome. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012;49:657–671.
44.
NoordhoffMSChenYRChenKTHongKFLoLJ. The surgical technique for the complete unilateral cleft lip-nasal deformity. Oper Tech Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;2:167–174.
45.
TseR. Unilateral cleft lip: principles and practice of surgical management. Semin Plast Surg. 2012;26:145–155.
FudalejPHortis-DzierzbickaMDudkiewiczZSembG. Dental arch relationship in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate following Warsaw (one-stage repair) and Oslo protocols. Cleft Palate Craniofac Jour. 2009;46:648–653.
59.
PereiraRMRSiqueiraNCostaEdo ValeDAlonsoN.Unilateral cleft lip and palate surgical protocols and facial growth outcomes. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29:1562–1568.
60.
XuXKwonHJShiBZhengQYinHLiC. Influence of different palate repair protocols on facial growth in unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43:43–47.
61.
HupkensPLauretGJDubelaarIJMHartmanEHMSpauwenPHM. Prevention of wound dehiscence in palatal surgery by preoperative identification of group A Streptococcus and Staphylococcus aureus. Eur J Plast Surg. 2007;29:321–325.
62.
SmythAGKnepilGJ. Prophylactic antibiotics and surgery for primary clefts. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;46:107–109.
63.
AznarMLSchönmeyrBEchanizGNebekerLWendbyLCampbellA. Role of postoperative antimicrobials in cleft palate surgery: prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study in India. Plast Reconstr Surg2015;136:59e–66e.
64.
DurgaPRaavulaPGurajalaI, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of tranexamic acid on the surgical field in primary cleft palate surgery on children-A prospective, randomized clinical study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2015;52:e183–e187.
65.
ArantesGCPereiraRMRde MeloDBAlonsoNdo DuarteM CMB. Effectiveness of tranexamic acid for reducing intraoperative bleeding in palatoplasties: a randomized clinical trial. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017;45:642–648.
66.
BatemanMCConejeroJAMooneyEKRothkopfDM. Short-stay cleft palate surgery with intraoperative dexamethasone and marcaine. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;57:245–247.
67.
SendersCWdi MauroSMBrodieHAEmeryBESykesJM. The efficacy of perioperative steroid therapy in pediatric primary palatoplasty. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1999;36:340–344.
68.
BouaggadAMedraouiMBouderkaMA. The effect of dexamethasone on recovery from cleft palate surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007;24:99.
BrennanPAMacey-DareLVFloodTRMarkusAFUppalR. Cleft lip and palate management by UK Consultant oral and maxillofacial surgeons: a national survey. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001;38:44–48.
71.
PigottRW. Organisation of cleft lip and palate services - results of a questionnaire. Br J Plast Surg. 1992;45:385–387.
72.
RohrichRJByrdHS. Optimal timing of cleft palate closure. Speech, facial growth, and hearing considerations. Clin Plast Surg. 1990;17:27–36.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
