Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-11
Dental Subphenotypes in Infants With Orofacial Clefts—A Longitudinal Population-Based Retrospective Radiographic Study of the Primary and Secondary Dentitions
Longitudinal records and radiographs of 192 nonsyndromic Northern European infants with isolated unilateral cleft lip (UCL, n = 111) and isolated cleft palate (CP, n = 81).
Methods:
Radiographic assessments of primary and secondary dentition anomalies and dental maturation, by gender and cleft severity for comparisons between the groups and with historical controls.
Results:
In infants with UCL, the frequencies of dental anomalies were high in both primary (38.7%) and secondary (18.0%) dentitions. Primary and secondary dentition anomalies were not observed in infants with CP and different in the UCL group (P = .003). Risk differences involved primary supernumerary teeth (P = .0001) and talon cusp formation (P = .0001), and secondary tooth agenesis (P = .001) of the maxillary lateral incisor on the side of the cleft lip. Delayed primary and secondary dental maturation occurred in the UCL and CP groups, greater in infants with UCL (P < .0001). Primary and secondary dental maturation featured sexual dimorphism with greater delay in males (UCL, P < .0001; CP, .0001 > P = .001). The effect of cleft severity on dental maturation was significant in infants with UCL (P = .0361) and CP (P = .0175) in the primary but not in the secondary dentition.
Conclusions:
There were different dental anomalies in the primary and secondary dentitions in operated infants with UCL and no dental anomalies in unoperated infants with CP. Dental maturation was delayed in infants with UCL and CP with greater delay in males compared to females.
AlQahtaniSJHectorMPLiversidgeHM. Brief communication: the London Atlas of human tooth development and eruption. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2010;142(3):481–490.
2.
AlQahtaniSJHectorMPLiversidgeHM. Accuracy of dental age estimation charts: Schour and Massler, Ubelaker and the London Atlas. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2014;154(1):70–78.
3.
AsllanajBKragtLVosholIKoudstaalMKuijpersMAXiTBergéSJVermeij-KeersCOngkosuwitoEM. Dentition patterns in different unilateral cleft lip subphenotypes. J Dent Res. 2017;96(13):1482–1489.
4.
AthanasiadisGChengJYVilhjálmssonBJJørgensenFGAlsTDLe HellardSEspesethTSullivanPFHultmanCMKjærgaardPC, et al.Nationwide genomic study in Denmark reveals remarkable population homogeneity. Genetics. 2016;204(2):711–722.
5.
BøhnA. Dental anomalies in harelip and cleft palate. Acta Odontol Scand. 1963;9(1):41–59.
6.
CameriereRFerranteLLiversidgeHMPrietoJLBrkicH. Accuracy of age estimation in children using radiograph of developing teeth. Forensic Sci Int. 2008;176(2-3);173–177.
7.
ChailletNNyströmMDemirjianA.Comparison of dental maturity in children of different ethnic origins: international maturity curves for clinicians. J Forensic Sci. 2005;50(5):1164–1174.
8.
ConceiçãoELNCardosoHFV.Environmental effects on skeletal versus dental development II: further testing of a basic assumption in human osteological research. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2008;144(3):463–470.
9.
DentinoKMPeckSGaribDG. Is the missing incisor in complete cleft lip and palate a product of the genetics or local environment?Angle Orthod. 2012;82(6):959–963.
10.
DhamoBKragtLGrgicOVucicSMedina-GomezCRivadeneiraFJaddoeVWVWolviusEBOngkosuwitoEM. Ancestry and dental development: a geographic and genetic perspective. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2018;165(2), 299–308.
11.
DixonMJMarazitaMLBeatyTHMurrayJC. Cleft lip and palate: understanding genetic and environmental influences. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(13):167–178.
12.
ElaminFLiversidgeHM. Malnutrition has no effect on the timing of human tooth formation. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):1–8.
13.
FishmanLS. Factors related to tooth number, eruption time, and tooth position in cleft palate individuals. ASDC J Dent Child. 1970;37(4):303–306.
14.
Fogh-AndersenP.Inheritance of Harelip and Cleft Palate: Contribution to the Elucidation of the Etiology of the Congenital Clefts of the Face[Dissertation]. Nyt Nordisk Forlag; 1942.
15.
GhafariRGhodousiAPoordavarE. Comparison of the accuracy of the London atlas and Smith method in dental age estimation in 5–15.99-year-old Iranians using the panoramic view. Int J Legal Med. 2019;133(1):189–195.
16.
GrosenDChevrierCSkyttheABilleCMølstedKSivertsenAMurrayJCChristensenK. A cohort study of recurrence patterns among more than 54,000 relatives of oral cleft cases in Denmark: support for the multifactorial threshold model of inheritance. J Med Genet. 2010;47(3):162–168.
17.
HarrisEFHullingsJG. Delayed dental development in children with isolated cleft lip and palate. Arch Oral Biol. 1990;35(6):469–473.
18.
HermannNVJensenBLDahlEDarvannTAKreiborgS. A method for three-projection infant cepholometry. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001;38(4):299–316.
19.
HermannNVKreiborgSDarvannTAJensenBLDahlEBolundS. Early craniofacial morphology and growth in children with unoperated isolated cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2002;39(6):604–622.
20.
HovorakovaMLesotHPeterkaMPeterkovaR. Early development of the human dentition revisited. J Anat. 2018;233(2):135–145.
21.
HoweBJCooperMEVieiraARWeinbergSMResickJMNideyNLWehbyGLMarazitaMLMoreno UribeLM. Spectrum of dental phenotypes in nonsyndromic orofacial clefting. J Dent Res. 2015;94(7):905–912.
22.
IPDTOC Working Group. Prevalence at birth of cleft lip with or without cleft palate: data from the International Perinatal Database of Typical Oral Clefts (IPDTOC). Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011; 48(1):66–81.
23.
JensenBLDahlEKreiborgS. Longitudinal study of the body height, radius length amd skeletal maturity in Danish boys with cleft lip and palate. Scand J Dent Res. 1983; 91(6):473–481.
24.
JensenBLKreiborgSDahlEFogh-AndersenP. Cleft lip and palate in Denmark, 1976-1981: epidemiology, variability, and early somatic development. Cleft Palate J. 1988; 25(3):258–269.
25.
JugessurAFarliePGKilpatrickN. The genetics of isolated orofacial clefts: from genotypes to subphenotypes. Oral Dis. 2009;15(7):437–453.
26.
KernahanDAStarkRB. A new classification for cleft lip and cleft palate. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull1958;22(5):435–441.
27.
KershawJRøyrvikEC. The ‘People of the British Isles’ project and Viking settlement in England. Antiquity. 2016;90(354):1670–1680.
28.
KirkhamHLD. Dentition in cleft palate cases. Int J Orthod and Oral Surg. 1931;17(11):1076–1083.
29.
KorolenkovaMVStarikovaNVUdalovaNV. The role of external aetiological factors in dental anomalies in non-syndromic cleft lip and palate patients. Paediatr Dent. 2018;20(2):105–111.
30.
KreiborgSDahlEPrydsoeU. A unit for infant roentgencephalometry. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1977; 6(2):107–111.
31.
LandisJRKochGG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–174.
32.
LekkasCLatiefBSTer RaheSPNKuijpers-JagtmanAM. The adult unoperated cleft patient: absence of maxillary teeth outside the cleft area. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000;37 (1):17–20.
33.
LekkasCLatiefBSTer RaheSPNKuijpers-JagtmanAM. The unoperated adult cleft patient: teeth in the cleft area. Eur J Plast Surg. 2001;24(3):118–122.
34.
LiversidgeHM. Timing of Demirjian’s tooth formation stages. Ann. Hum. Biol. 2006;33(4):454–470.
35.
LiversidgeHM. Similarity in dental maturation in two ethnic groups of London children. Ann Hum Biol. 2011;38(6):702–715.
36.
LuijsterburgAJMRozendaalAMVermeij-KeersC. Classifying common oral clefts: a new approach after descriptive registration. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014;51(4):381-391.
37.
McBrideWAMcIntyreGTCarrollKMosseyPA. Subphenotyping and classification of orofacial clefts: need for orofacial cleft subphenotyping calls for revised classification. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014;53(5):539-549.
38.
MenezesRVieiraAR. Dental anomalies as part of the cleft spectrum. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008;45(4):414–419.
39.
MoorreesCFFanningEAHuntEEJr. Formation and resorption for three deciduous teeth. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1963;21(2):205-213.
40.
OoéT. On the early development of human dental lamina. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn. 1957; 30(2):198–210.
41.
OzturkTGumusHOzturkG. Are dental maturation, skeletal maturation, and chronological age associated with complete cleft lip and palate? [published online ahead of print August 3, 2020]Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020.
42.
PaulssonLBondemarkLSöderfeldtB. A systematic review of the consequences of premature birth on palatal morphology, dental occlusion, tooth-crown dimensions, and tooth maturity and eruption. Angle Orthod. 2004;74(2):269–279.
43.
PegelowMAlqadiNKarstenAL. The prevalence of various dental characteristics in the primary and mixed dentition in patients born with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip with or without cleft palate. Eur J Orthod. 2012;34(5):561-570.
44.
PhanMConteFKhandelwalKDOckeloenCWBartzelaTKleefstraTvan BokhovenHRubiniMZhouHCarelsCEL. Tooth agenesis and orofacial clefting: genetic brothers in arms?Hum Genet. 2016;135(12):122–1327.
45.
PolderBJvan’t HofMAvan der LindenFPGMKuijpers-JagtmanAM. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of dental agenesis in permanent teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2004;32(3):217–226.
46.
PöyryMNyströmMRantaR. Tooth development in children with cleft lip and palate: a longitudinal study from birth to adolescence. Eur J Orthod. 1989;11(2):125–130.
47.
RantaR. A comparative study of tooth formation in the permanent dentition of Finnish children with cleft lip and palate. An orthopantomographic study. Proc Finn Dent Soc. 1972;68(2):58–66.
48.
RantaR. Review of tooth formation in children with cleft lip/palate. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1986;90(1):11–18.
49.
RavnJJ. Aplasia, supernumerary teeth and fused teeth in the primary dentition: an epidemiologic study. Eur J Oral Sci. 1971;79(1):1–6.
50.
RizellSBellardieHKarstenASælePMooneyJHeliövaaraAKüselerABrinkESkaarePMølstedK, et al.Scandcleft randomized trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: dental anomalies in 8-year-olds. Eur J Orthod. 2020;42(1):8–14.
51.
SharpGCHoKDaviesAStergiakouliEHumphriesKMcArdleWSandyJSmithGDLewisSJReltonCL. Distinct DNA methylation profiles in subtypes of orofacial cleft. Clin Epigenetics. 2017;9(1):63.
52.
StackMV. Forensic estimation of age in infancy by gravimetric observations on the developing dentition. J Forensic Sci Soc.1960;1(1):49–59.
53.
SuzukiANakanoMYoshizakiKYasunagaAHaruyamaNTakahashiI. A longitudinal study of the presence of dental anomalies in the primary and permanent dentitions of cleft lip and/or palate patients. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017;54(3):309–320.
54.
TanELYKuekMCWongHCYowM.Longitudinal dental maturation of children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate: a case-control cohort study. Orthod Craniofacial Res. 2017; 20(4):189–195.
55.
TannurePNAroeiraCOliveiraGRMaiaLCVieiraARGranjeiroJMCostaMC. Prevalence of dental anomalies in nonsyndromic individuals with cleft lip and palate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012;49(2):194–200.
56.
TsaiTPHuangCSHuangCCSeeLC. Distribution patterns of primary and permanent dentition in children with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1998;35(2): 154–160.
57.
von ElmEAltmanDGEggerMPocockSJGøtzschePCVandenbrouckeJP. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE). J Clin Epidemiol.2008;61(4):344–349.
58.
WeinbergSMNeiswangerKMartinRAMooneyMPKaneAAWengerSLLoseeJDeleyiannisFMaLDe SalamancaJE, et al.The Pittsburgh oral-facial cleft study: expanding the cleft phenotypes. Background and justification. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006;43(1):7–20.
59.
WhitakerLAPashayanHReichmanJA. Proposed new classification of craniofacial anomalies. Cleft Palate J. 1981;18(3):161-167.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
