The Clinical Significance of Clinocephaly in Late-Presentation Sagittal Craniosynostosis

Abstract

Background

The diagnosis of late-presentation sagittal suture craniosynostosis (SCS) can be challenging, especially in the setting of subtle physical exam findings. The clinical significance of clinocephaly—a retro-coronal concavity along the midvault—in this context remains unknown. The aim of this study is to evaluate the predictive value of clinocephaly in identifying late-presentation SCS.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of all patients >1 year old presenting to the craniofacial clinic with a concern for SCS was performed. The presence or absence of SCS in the setting of clinocephaly was recorded following diagnostic imaging. Student's t test, Chi Square test, and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to determine predictors for SCS.

Results

75 patients met inclusion criteria. 32 patients (42.7%, 6% female) were diagnosed with SCS. No difference in age between patients with and without SCS was detected. Stratification of patients by age (1–2, 2–4, and >4 years) revealed a higher rate of SCS in younger patients (P = 0.04). The cephalic index (C.I.) of those with sagittal synostosis was significantly smaller but within the normal range, indicating a more scaphocephalic shape (P = 0.003). Logistic regression analysis revealed that C.I. was a strong predictor for SCS (P = 0.003). Of those with SCS, a mix of complete and partial fusion of the sagittal suture was appreciated.

Conclusion

This study found that 42.7% of patients with clinocephaly had SCS. C.I. was the only predictor for SCS and unique suture fusion patterns were identified in those with SCS. This study suggests that clinocephaly should be considered a core component of the exam and work-up for SCS. Future studies aimed at evaluating the positive predictive value of this exam finding and identifying risk factors associated with late-presentation SCS are underway.