To assess speech outcomes at five and ten years of age in a nationwide study of children with orofacial cleft.
Design
Prospective study.
Participants
Children born with orofacial cleft and having primary surgery in New Zealand. Speech samples were available for 151 five-year-old, and 163 ten-year-old children.
Main outcome measures
Intelligibility, Acceptability, Velopharyngeal function, Hypernasality, Hyponasality, severity of airflow evaluated by perceptual speech assessment (using the standardised Rhinocleft assessment), and overall assessment of requirement for clinical intervention.
Results
A large proportion of five-year-old children had speech that was considered to be not completely intelligible, was not acceptable, and had inadequate velopharyngeal function. The noted deficiencies led to a clinical judgement that further speech and/or surgical intervention was required in 85% with cleft lip and palate, 65% with cleft palate and 26% with cleft lip. The proportion of children with poor speech outcomes in the ten-year-old children was lower, though of clinical importance, further intervention required for 25% with CLP, 15% with CP and 3% with CL. The number of sound production errors in both age groups followed the same pattern with fewest in those with CL and most in those with CLP.
Conclusions
A significant proportion of children with orofacial cleft were found to have poor speech outcomes requiring further treatment. The outcomes are poor compared to centres reported in the UK and Scandinavia. New Zealand requires a review of the current services for individuals born with cleft to improve speech outcomes and interdisciplinary care.
AhlRHarding-BellA. Comparing methodologies in a series of speech outcome studies: challenges and lessons learned. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018;55(1):35‐44.
2.
BaillieLSellD. Benchmarking speech, velopharyngeal function outcomes and surgical characteristics following the sommerlad protocol and palate repair technique. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020;57(10):1197‐1215.
BrittonLAlberyLBowdenMHarding-BellAPhippenGSellD. A cross-sectional cohort study of speech in five-year-olds with cleft palate + /- lip to support development of national audit standards: benchmarking speech standards in the United Kingdom. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014;51(4):431‐451.
5.
BrunnegårdKLohmanderA. A cross-sectional study of speech in 10-year-old children with cleft palate: results and issues of rater reliability. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007;44(1):33‐44.
6.
ChapmanKL. Phonologic processes in children with cleft palate. Cleft Palate-Craniofac J. 1993;30(1):64‐72.
7.
ChapmanKLBaylisATrost-CardamoneJCorderoKNDixonADobbelsteynCSellD. The americleft speech project: a training and reliability study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016;53(1):93‐108.
8.
ChapmanKLHardin-JonesMHalterKA. The relationship between early speech and later speech and language performance for children with cleft lip and palate. Clin Linguist Phon. 2003;17(3):173‐197.
9.
FitzsimonsD. The Rhinocleft®: A Comprehensive Perceptual Assessment of Velopharyngeal Function for Children. PhD. Sydney, Australia: The University of Sydney; 2018.
10.
FowlerPVAl-AniAHThompsonJMD. Bone fill following secondary alveolar bone grafting for children with cleft of the alveolus in New Zealand. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2019;22(3):153‐158.
11.
FowlerPVAyreySLStonePRThompsonJMD. A nationwide survey of oral health related quality of life of children with orofacial cleft in New Zealand. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021;58(8):1040-10406.
12.
FowlerPVKeallHKennedyDHealeyDThompsonJMD. Dental arch relationship outcomes for children with complete unilateral and complete bilateral cleft lip and palate in New Zealand. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2019;22(3):147‐152.
13.
FowlerPVWholleyCPerryJGThompsonJMD. Craniofacial morphology and soft tissue profile outcomes for complete unilateral and complete bilateral cleft lip and palate in New Zealand. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2019;22(3):139‐146.
14.
HallCGolding-KushnerKJ. Long-term follow-up of 500 patients after palate repair perfomed after 18 months of age. Paper presented at the Sixth international Congress on Cleft palate and related craniofacial anomalies Jerusalem; 1989; Israel.
15.
HardingAGrunwellP. Active versus passive cleft-type speech characteristics. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 1998;33(3):329‐352.
16.
Harding-BellA. Case Studies in Cleft Palate Speech: Data analysis and principled intervention. Emsworth, UK: 2019. J&R Press Limited.
17.
HenningssonGKuehnDPSellDSweeneyTTrost-CardamoneJEWhitehillTL, Speech Parameters Group. Universal parameters for reporting speech outcomes in individuals with cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008;45(1):1‐17.
18.
HowardSHelselwoodBHarding-BellA. Chapter 2: the nature of speech associated with cleft palate. In: Harding-BellA, ed. Case Studies in Cleft Palate Speech: Data analysis and principled intervention. J&R Press Ltd; 2019.
19.
IllingworthCJeremyAHarding-BellA. Chapter 14: A psychologial approach to cleft-related speech difficulties in adolescence and adulthood. Case Studies in Cleft Palate Speech: Data analysis and principled intervention. Emsworth, UK: J&R Press Ltd; 2019.
20.
JohnASellDSweeneyTHarding-BellAWilliamsA. The cleft audit protocol for speech-augmented: a validated and reliable measure for auditing cleft speech. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006;43(3):272‐288.
21.
JonesTAl-GhatamRAtackNDeaconSPowerRAlberyLSandyJ. A review of outcome measures used in cleft care. J Orthod. 2014;41(2):128‐140.
22.
KuehnDPMollerK. Speech and language issues in the cleft palate population: the state of the art. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000;37(4).
23.
LancasterHSLienKMChowJCFreyJRSchererNJKaiserAP. Early speech and language development in children With nonsyndromic cleft Lip and/or palate: a meta-analysis. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020;63(1):14‐31.
24.
LandisJRKochGG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159‐174.
25.
LohmanderA. Surgical intervention and speech outcomes in cleft lip and palate. In: HowardALS, ed. Cleft palate speech: Assessment and intervention. Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011:55‐85.
26.
LohmanderAPerssonCWilladsenELundeborgIAlaluusuaSAuknerRSembG. Scandcleft randomised trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: 4. Speech outcomes in 5-year-olds - velopharyngeal competency and hypernasality. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2017;51(1):27‐37.
27.
LohmanderAWilladsenEPerssonCHenningssonGBowdenMHuttersB. Methodology for speech assessment in the scandcleft project–an international randomized clinical trial on palatal surgery: experiences from a pilot study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009;46(4):347‐362.
28.
McWilliamsBJMorrisHLSheltonRL. Cleft palate speech. 2nd Ed. ed.Philadelphia: BC Decker; 1990.
29.
NybergJNeoviusELohmanderA. Speech outcomes at 5 and 10 years of age after one-stage palatal repair with muscle reconstruction in children born with isolated cleft palate. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2018;52(1):20‐29.
30.
NybergJPetersonPLohmanderA. Speech outcomes at age 5 and 10 years in unilateral cleft lip and palate after one-stage palatal repair with minimal incision technique - a longitudinal perspective. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;78(10):1662‐1670.
31.
PamplonaMYsunzaP. Language proficiency in children with cleft palate. Int Arch commun disord. 2008;1(1).
32.
Peterson-FalzoneSJTrostcardamoneJKarnellMPHardin-JonesM. The Clinicians guide to treating Cleft Palate Speech. St Louis, USA: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016.
33.
PurdySKimJHHarding-BellA. Chapter 8 hearing loss and the impact on speech in children with cleft palate. In: Harding-BellA, ed. Case Studies in Cleft Palate Speech: Data analysis and principled intervention. Emsworth, UK: J&R Press Ltd; 2019.
34.
SchererNJWilliamsALProctor-WilliamsK. Early and later vocalization skills in children with and without cleft palate. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;72(6):827‐840.
35.
SellD. Issues in perceptual speech analysis in cleft palate and related disorders: a review. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2005;40(2):103‐121.
36.
SellDGrunwellPMildinhallSMurphyTCornishTABearnDSandyJR. Cleft lip and palate care in the United Kingdom–the clinical standards advisory group (CSAG) study. Part 3: speech outcomes. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001;38(1):30‐37.
37.
SellDHardingAGrunwellP. GOS.SP.ASS.'98: an assessment for speech disorders associated with cleft palate and/or velopharyngeal dysfunction (revised). Int J Lang Commun Disord. 1999;34(1):17‐33.
38.
SellDHarding-BellA. Speech and velopharyngeal function. Case Studies in Cleft Palate Speech: Data analysis and principled intervention. 2019.
39.
SellDMildinhallSAlberyLWillsAKSandyJRNessAR. The cleft care UK study. Part 4: perceptual speech outcomes. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2015;18(Suppl 2):36‐46.
40.
SheahanPMillerISheahanJNEarleyMJBlayneyAW. Incidence and outcome of middle ear disease in cleft lip and/or cleft palate. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2003;67(7):785‐793.
41.
ShribergLDKwiatkowskiJHoffmannK. A procedure for phonetic transcription by consensus. J Speech Hear Res. 1984;27(3):456-465.
42.
SommerladBC. A technique for cleft palate repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(6):1542‐1548.
43.
SommerladBC. Evaluation of VPI-assessment with videofluoroscopy and nasoendoscopy. Br J Plast Surg. 2005;58(7):932‐933.
44.
SpeakeJHarding-BellA. Chapter 12. Principles of intervetion. In: Harding-BellA, ed. Case Studies in Cleft Palate Speech: Data analysis and principled intervention. Emsworth, UK: J&R Press Ltd; 2019.
45.
ThompsonJMDAyreySLSlykermanRFStonePRFowlerPV. Behavioral outcomes in children With an orofacial cleft in a national study in New Zealand. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021a;58(8):1032-1039.
46.
ThompsonJMDAyreySLSlykermanRFStonePRFowlerPV. Quality of life using general population validated questionnaires in children with cleft lip and/or palate in New Zealand. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021b;58(6):779-786.
47.
ThompsonJMDStonePRSandersMvan der ZeeHBormanBFowlerPV. The incidence of orofacial cleft in live births in New Zealand. N Z Med J. 2016;129(1440):64‐71.
48.
ThompsonJMDStonePRWilliamsK3SandersMMasonNPopeRFowlerPV. Nasolabial outcomes in a nationwide study of orofacial cleft in New Zealand. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2019;22(3):194‐200.
49.
VallinoLDZukerRNapoliJA. A study of speech, language, hearing, and dentition in children with cleft lip only. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008;45(5):485‐494.
50.
WilladsenELohmanderAPerssonCBoersMKisling-MøllerMHavstamCAndersenM. Scandcleft project, trial 1: comparison of speech outcome in relation to timing of hard palate closure in 5-year-olds With UCLP. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019;56(10):1276‐1286.
51.
WilladsenELohmanderAPerssonCLundeborgIAlaluusuaSAuknerRSembG. Scandcleft randomised trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: 5. Speech outcomes in 5-year-olds - consonant proficiency and errors. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2017;51(1):38‐51.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
