The purpose of this study was to evaluate perceived image quality, confidence in identifying key velopharyngeal landmarks, and reliability of making velopharyngeal measures between 3-dimensional (3-D) and 2-D magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods and between T1-, T2-, and proton density (PD)-weighted sequences.
Methods:
Twelve healthy participants completed an MRI study. Three raters assessed overall image quality and their ability to identify key anatomic features within the images. A single rater evaluated the reliability of making measures between imaging methods and sequence types to determine if image type (2-D and 3-D) or image sequence (T1, T2, PD weighted) resulted in different values for key velopharyngeal landmarks.
Results:
An analysis of variance test revealed image quality was rated significantly different based on the scan type (P < .001) and the sequence used (P = .015). Image quality was rated higher among 2-D MR images compared to 3-D, and higher among T2 sequences compared to T1- and PD-weighted imaging methods. In contrast, raters favored 3-D sequences over 2-D sequences for identifying velopharyngeal landmarks. Measures of reliability revealed scan type significantly impacted 2 of the 6 variables but to a minimal degree; however, sequence type had no impact on measures of reliability across all variables.
Conclusion:
Results of the study suggest the scan type and sequence used are factors that likely do not impact the reliability of measures. Based on image quality, the recommended technique for velopharyngeal imaging would be using a 2-D T2-weighted technique. However, based on the ability to identify key landmarks, a 3-D T1- or PD-weighted technique was favored.
BaeYKuehnDPSuttonBPConwayCAPerryJL. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging of velopharyngeal structures. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011;54(6):1538–1545.
2.
EttemaSLKuehnDPPerlmanALAlperinN. Magnetic resonance imaging of the levator veli palatini muscle during speech. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2002;39(2):130–144.
3.
GeorgeTNKotlarekKJKuehnDPSuttonBPPerryJL. Differences in the tensor veli palatini between adults with and without cleft palate using high-resolution 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018;55(5):697–705.
4.
HaSKuehnDPCohenMAlperinN. Magnetic resonance imaging of the levator veli palatini muscle in speakers with repaired cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007;44(5):494–505.
5.
HessUHannigCSaderRCavallaroAWuttge-HannigAZeilhoferH. Evaluation of velopharyngeal closure in preoperative planning of maxillary advancement. Rontgenpraxis. 1996;49(2):25–26.
6.
KollaraLPerryJLHudsonS. Racial variations in velopharyngeal and craniometric morphology in children: an imaging study. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016;59(1):27–38.
7.
KollaraLPerryJL. Effects of gravity on the velopharyngeal structures in children using upright magnetic resonance imaging. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014;51(6):669–676.
8.
KotlarekKJPerryJLFangX. Morphology of the levator veli palatini muscle in adults with repaired cleft palate. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;28(3):833–837.
9.
KuehnDPEttemaSLGoldwasserMSBarkmeierJCWachtelJM. Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of occult submucous cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001;38(5):421–431.
10.
KuehnDPEttemaSLGoldwasserMSBarkmeierJC. Magnetic resonance imaging of the levator veli palatini muscle before and after primary palatoplasty. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2004;41(6):584–592.
11.
KummerAWClarkSLRedleEEThomsenLLBillmireDA. Current practice in assessing and reporting speech outcomes of cleft palate and velopharyngeal surgery: a survey of cleft palate/craniofacial professionals. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012;49(2):146–152.
12.
LamDJStarrJRPerkinsJALewisCWEblenLEDunlapJSieK. A comparison of nasendoscopy and multiview videofluoroscopy in assessing velopharyngeal insufficiency. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;134(3):394–402.
PerryJLKollaraLKuehnDPSuttonBPFangX. Examining age, sex, and race characteristics of velopharyngeal structures in 4- to 9-year old children using magnetic resonance imaging. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018a;55(1):21–34.
15.
PerryJLKollaraLKuehnDPSuttonBPFangX. Growth effects on velopharyngeal anatomy from childhood to adulthood. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019;62(3):682–692.
16.
PerryJLKotlarekKJSuttonBPKuehnDPJaskolkaMFangXPointSFrankR. Variations in velopharyngeal structure in adults with repaired cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018b;55(10):1409–1418.
17.
PerryJLMasonKSuttonBPKuehnDP. Can dynamic MRI be used to accurately identify velopharyngeal closure patterns?. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018c;55(4):499–507.
18.
PerryJLSuttonBPKuehnDPGamageJK. Using MRI for assessing velopharyngeal structures and function. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014;51(4):476–485.
19.
PerryJLKuehnDPSuttonBPGamageJKFangX. Anthropometric analysis of the velopharynx and related craniometric dimensions in three adult populations using MRI. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016;53(1):e1–e13.
20.
PerryJL. Variations in velopharyngeal structures between upright and supine positions using upright magnetic resonance imaging. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011;48(2):123–133.
21.
PigottRW. An analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of endoscopic and radiological investigations of the velopharyngeal incompetence based on 20 year experience of simultaneous recording. Br J Plast Surg. 2002;55(1):32–34.
22.
SaderRHorchHHHerzogMZeilhoferHFHannigCHessUBunteEBohmeG. High-frequency videocinematography for the objective imaging of the velopharyngeal closure mechanism in cleft palate patients. Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1994;55(4):169–175.
23.
SagarPNimkinK. Feasibility study to assess clinical applications of 3-T cine MRI coupled with synchronous audio recordings during speech in evaluation of velopharyngeal insufficiency in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2015;45(2):217–227.
24.
ShprintzenRJMcCallGNSkolnickMLLencioneRM. Selective movement of the lateral aspects of the pharyngeal walls during velopharyngeal closure for speech, blowing, and whistling in normals. Cleft Palate J. 1975;12(00):51–58.
25.
SieKCStarrJRBloomDCCunninghamMde SerresLMDrakeAFElluruRGHaddadJHartnickCMacarthurC, et al.Multicenter interrater and intrarater reliability in the endoscopic evaluation of velopharyngeal insufficiency. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;134(7):757–763.
26.
SkolnickMLCohnE. Videofluoroscopic Studies of Speech in Patients with Cleft Palate. Springer; 1989.
27.
SkolnickML. Videofluoroscopic examination of the velopharyngeal portal during phonation in lateral and base projections – a new technique for studying the mechanics of closure. Cleft Palate J. 1970;7(4):803–816.
28.
SkolnickML. Video velopharyngography in patients with nasal speech, with emphasis on lateral pharyngeal motion in velopharyngeal closure. Radiology. 1969;93(4):747–755.
29.
StringerDAWitzelMA. Comparison of multi-view videofluoroscopy and nasopharyngoscopy in the assessment of velopharyngeal insufficiency. Cleft Palate J. 1989;26(2):88–92.
30.
TianWRedettRJ. New velopharyngeal measurements at rest and during speech: implications and applications. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20(2):532–539.
31.
TianWYinHRedettRJShiBShiJZhangRZhengQ. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of the velopharyngeal mechanism at rest and during speech in Chinese adults and children. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010;53(6):1595–1615.
32.
TieuDDGerberMEMilczukHAParikhSRPerkinsJAYoonPJSieKC. Generation consensus in the application of a rating scale to nasendoscopic assessment of velopharyngeal function. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;138(10):923–928.
33.
TisdallMDHessATReuterMMeintjesEMFischlBvan der KouweAJ. Volumetric navigators for prospective motion correction and selective reacquisition in neuroanatomical MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2012;68(2):389–399.
34.
WitzelMAStringerDA. Methods of assessing velopharyngeal function. In: BardachJMorrisHL, eds. Secondary Surgical Treatment of Cleft Palate. WB Saunders; 1990:763–773.
35.
YamawakiYNishimuraYSuzukiYSawadaMYamawakiS. Rapid magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of velopharyngeal muscle movement on phonation. Am J Otolaryngol. 1997;18(3):210–213.
36.
YoonPJStarrJRPerkinsJABloomDSieKC. Interrater and intrarater reliability in the evaluation of velopharyngeal insufficiency within a single institution. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;132(9):947–951.
