The mainstay of palatal repair in the United Kingdom is the intravelar veloplasty (IVVP). It is not always possible to align the oral mucosa in the midline to achieve tension-free repair. The addition of lateral relieving incisions may aid transposition of the oral mucosa to allow closure. The aim of this study was to explore cleft features that may predispose to a requirement for relieving incisions in order to allow palate closure.
Design:
We performed a national multiinstitutional retrospective study using data from the UK Cleft Collective cohort study.
Patients:
The study sample consisted of 474 patients who had undergone IVVP at the time of palatal closure across all 16 of the UK cleft units.
Results:
We found strong evidence for the requirement for relieving incisions in patients with an increased degree of clefting per the Veau classification (P < .001), increasing palatal soft-edge width (P < .001) and moderate evidence of an associated use in patients with Pierre Robin sequence (P = .015). Insufficient data were available to explore the relationship between intertuberosity distance and the presence of fistula formation with the use of relieving incisions.
Conclusions:
The results of this study identify cleft features that increase the likelihood for requiring lateral relieving incisions to allow palatal closure. The degree to which the addition of relieving incisions to IVVP affects maxillary growth and speech outcomes is unknown. Further study is required to answer this important question.
BakerSKirschnerRHuangKSarwerDLowDBartlettS. Incidence and etiology of cleft palate fistulas: analysis of 429 consecutive Furlow palatoplasties. Presented at the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Meeting; April12, 2000; Atlanta
2.
BardachJMorrisHLOlinWH. Late results of primary veloplasty: the Marburg project. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;73(2):207–218.
3.
BardachJSalyerKE. Cleft palate repair. In: BardachJSalyerKE, eds. Surgical Techniques in Cleft Lip and Palate. Mosby; 1991:224–273.
4.
BerkowitzS. A multicenter retrospective 3D study of serial complete unilateral cleft lip and palate and complete bilateral cleft lip and palate casts to evaluate treatment. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1999;36(5):413–424.
5.
BraithwaiteFMauriceDG. The importance of the levator palatini muscle in cleft palate closure. Br J Plast Surg. 1968;21(1):60–62.
6.
ChateRDiBlaseDBallJMarsMSommerladB. A comparison of the dental occlusions from a United Kingdom sample of the complete unilateral cleft lip and palate patients with those from the Eurocleft Study. Transactions of the 8th International Congress on Cleft Palate and Related Craniofacial Anomalies. Stamford Press, Academy of Medicine. 1997:371–376.
7.
CroninTD. Method of preventing raw area on nasal surface of soft palate in push-back surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1957;20(6):474–484.
8.
CuttingCRosenbaumJRovatiL. The technique of muscle repair in the cleft soft palate. Operat Tech Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;2(4):215–222.
9.
FarronatoGKairyteLGianniniLGalbiatiGMasperoC. How various surgical protocols of the unilateral cleft lip and palate influence the facial growth and possible orthodontic problems? Which is the best timing of lip, palate and alveolus repair? Literature review. Stomatologija. 2014;16(2):53–60.
HardwickeJLandiniGRichardsB. Fistula incidence after primary cleft palate repair: a systemic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(4):618–627.
12.
KappenIFPMBittermannDJanssenLBittermannGKPBoonackerCHaverkampSde WildeHVan Der HeulMSpeckenTFKooleR, et al.Long-term follow-up study of young adults treated from unilateral complete cleft lip, alveolus, and palate by a treatment protocol including two-stage palatoplasty: speech outcomes. Arch Plast Surg. 2017;44(3):202–209.
13.
KilnerTP.Cleft lip and palate repair technique. In: MaingotR, ed. Postgraduate Surgery, Vol 3. Medical Publishers; 1937.
14.
KriensO. An anatomical approach to veloplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;43(1):29–41.
15.
KriensO. Fundamental anatomic findings for an intravelar veloplasty. Cleft Palate J. 1970;7(1):27–36.
16.
KriensO. LAHSHAL: a concise documentation system for cleft lip, alveolus, and palate diagnoses. In KriensO, ed. What Is a Cleft Lip and Palate?: A Multidisciplinary Update. Thieme Medical Publishers; 1989:30–34.
17.
Langenbeck Bvon. Die uranoplastik mittles ablösung des mucössperiostalen gaumenüberzuges. August Hirschwald; 1861.
18.
LaRossaDJacksonOHKirschnerRELowDWSolotCBCohenMAMayroRWangPMinugh-PurvisNRandallP.The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia modification of the Furlow double-opposing z-palatoplasty: long-term speech and growth results. Clin Plastic Surg. 2004;31(2):243–249.
19.
LatiefBSLekkasKCScholsJGFudalejPSKuijpersMA. Width and elevation of the palatal shelves in unoperated unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients in the permanent dentition. J Anat. 2012;220(3):263–270.
20.
LohmanderAFriedeHLiljaJ. Long-term, longitudinal follow-up of individuals with unilateral cleft lip and palate after the Gothenburg primary early veloplasty and delayed hard palate closure protocol: speech outcome. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012;49(6):657–671.
21.
MalufIJrDoroUFuchsTdos SantosDEdos Santos SacomamFda Silva FreitasRRocaGB. Evaluation of maxillary growth: is there any difference using relief incision during palatoplasty?J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(3):772–774.
22.
MayroRLaRossaDRandallPLowDSanfaconDRamachandranU. Incidence of posterior dental crossbite post Furlow palatoplasty. Presented at the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Meeting; April12, 1997; New Orleans
23.
McBrideWAMcIntyreGTCarrollKMosseyPA. Subphenotyping and classification of orofacial clefts: need for orofacial cleft subphenotyping calls for revised classification. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016;53(5):539–549.
24.
ParikakisKLarsonOKarstenA. Minimal incision palatoplasty with or without muscle reconstruction in patients with isolated cleft palate – a cephalometric study at 5 and 10 years. Eur J Orthod. 2019;41(4):420–427.
25.
RossRB. Treatment variables affecting facial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J. 1987;24(1):75–77.
26.
SandyJWilliamsAMildinhallSMurphyT. The Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) cleft lip and palate study. Br J Orthod. 1998;25(1):21–30.
27.
SchweckendiekWDozP. Primary veloplasty: long-term results without maxillary deformity – a twenty-five year report. Cleft Palate J. 1978;15(3):268–274.
28.
ShawWCBrattströmVMølstedKPrahl-AndersenBRobertsCTSembG. The Eurocleft study: intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 5: discussion and conclusions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005;42(1):93–98.
29.
ShetyeP. Facial growth of adults with unoperated clefts. Clin Plastic Surg. 2004;31(2):361–371.
30.
ShiBLoseeJ. The impact of cleft lip and palate repair on maxillofacial growth. Int J Oral Sci. 2015;7(1):14–17.
31.
SommerladB. A technique for cleft palate repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(6):1542–1548.
32.
TukeyJW. Exploratory Data Analysis. Addison-Wesley; 1977.
33.
VeauV. Division Palatine. Masson and Cie; 1931.
34.
WangPKirschnerRMinugh-PurvisNRandallPLaRossaD. Relaxing incisions do not adversely affect the A-P midfacial growth in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients. Presented at the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association Meeting; April16, 1999; Scottsdale (AZ).
35.
WardillWEM. Technique of operation for cleft lip and palate. Brit J Surg. 1937;25(97):117–130.
36.
YangARichardBWillsAMahmoudOSandyJNessA. Closer to the truth on national fistula prevalence after unilateral complete cleft lip and palate repair? The Cleft Care UK Study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020;57(1):5–13.
37.
YeBRuanCHuJYangYThomasJZhangG. A comparative study on the measurements of palatal shelf area and gradient for adult patients with unoperated cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012;49(5):561–565.
38.
YsunzaAPamplonaMCMendozaMGarcía-VelascoMAguilarMPGuerreroME. Speech outcome and maxillary growth in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip/palate operated on 6 versus 12 months of age. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102(3):675–679.
