Trajectories of the Psychological Status of Mothers of Infants With Nonsyndromic Orofacial Clefts: A Prospective Cohort Study From the Japan Environment and Children’s Study
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2021
Trajectories of the Psychological Status of Mothers of Infants With Nonsyndromic Orofacial Clefts: A Prospective Cohort Study From the Japan Environment and Children’s Study
This study examined psychological status trajectories of mothers of infants with nonsyndromic orofacial clefts in Japan.
Design:
Prospective cohort study.
Setting:
Data from the Japan Environment and Children’s Study.
Participants:
Infants with a nonsyndromic cleft (N = 148) including cleft lip and palate (CLP; n = 72), cleft lip (CL; n = 46), and cleft palate (CP; n = 30). The control group included unaffected infants (N = 84 454).
Main Outcome Measures:
At 15 weeks and 27 weeks of pregnancy and 12 months after birth, the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (clinical cutoff ≥5) was used. At 1 month and 6 months after birth, the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (clinical cutoff ≥9) was used.
Results:
Prenatal diagnosis rates were unavailable. Mothers of infants with CLP had higher psychological distress than controls at 27 weeks of pregnancy (prevalence ratio [PR] = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.06-1.74) and postnatal depression at 1 month after birth (PR = 2.21, 95% CI: 1.53-3.19). Mothers of infants with CP showed heightened psychological distress at 27 weeks of pregnancy (PR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.21-2.17) and postnatal depression 6 months after birth (PR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.01-3.43). There was no significant association between CL and maternal psychological status. At 12 months after birth, no differences in distress were found between mothers of infants with a cleft and controls.
Conclusions:
Mothers of infants with orofacial clefts may need psychosocial support, particularly during pregnancy and the first year after birth.
Andrews-CasalMJohnstonDFletcherJMullikenJBStalSHechtJT. Cleft lip with or without cleft palate: effect of family history on reproductive planning, surgical timing, and parental stress. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1998;35(1):52–57.
2.
ArifinSRMCheyneHMaxwellM. Review of the prevalence of postnatal depression across cultures. AIMS Public Health2018;5(3):260–295. doi:10.3934/publichealth.2018.3.260
3.
CampbellACostelloBJRuizRL. Cleft lip and palate surgery: an update of clinical outcomes for primary repair. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin. 2010;22(1):43–58.
4.
CassellCHDanielsJMeyerRE. Timeliness of primary cleft lip/palate surgery. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009;46(6):588–597.
5.
ChuacharoenRRitthagolWHunsrisakhunJNilmanatK. Felt needs of parents who have a 0- to 3-month-old child with a cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009;46(3):252–257. doi:10.1597/07-099.1
6.
CockellALeesM. Prenatal diagnosis and management of orofacial clefts. Prenat Diagn. 2000;20(2):149–151.
7.
CollettBRCloonanYKSpeltzMLAnderkaMWerlerMM. Psychosocial functioning in children with and without orofacial clefts and their parents. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012;49(4):397–405.
8.
CoxJLHoldenJMSagovskyR. Detection of postnatal depression: development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1987;150(6):782–786.
9.
DesparsJPeterCBorghiniAPierrehumbertBHabersaatSMüller-NixCAnsermetFHohlfeldH. Impact of a cleft lip and/or palate on maternal stress and attachment representations. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011;48(4):419–424.
10.
FurukawaTAKawakamiNSaitohMOnoYNakaneYNakamuraYTachimoriHIwataNUdaHNakaneH, et al.The performance of the Japanese version of the K6 and K10 in the World Mental Health Survey Japan. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2008;17(3):152–158.
11.
GavinNIGaynesBNLohrKNMeltzer-BrodySGartlehnerGSwinsonT. Perinatal depression: a systematic review of prevalence and incidence. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(5 pt 1):1071–1083. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000183597.31630.db
12.
GepshteinY. Happiness as an outcome of childbirth: the perspective of traditional Japanese midwives and their patients. In: AnnaMPaulH, ed. Psychology of Happiness. Nova Science Publishers; 2010:157–167.
13.
Jama-AlolKAMooreHCJacobyPBowerCLehmannD. Morbidity due to acute lower respiratory infection in children with birth defects: a total population-based linked data study. BMC Pediatr2014;14(1):80. doi:10.1186/1471-2431-14-80
14.
Japan Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Japan Society for Surgical Wound Care, Japan Society of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery (in Japanese). Keisei Geka Shinryo Guideline. Vol. 6. KANEHARA; 2015.
15.
Japanese Society of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Koshinretsu Kogairetsu Shinryo Guidelines (in Japanese). 2008.
16.
JohanssonBRingsbergKC. Parents’ experiences of having a child with cleft lip and palate. J Adv Nurs. 2004;47(2):165–173.
17.
JohnsALHershfieldJASeifuNMHaynesKA. Postpartum depression in mothers of infants with cleft lip and/or palate. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(4):e354–e358.
18.
Kapp-SimonKA. A brief overview of psychological issues in cleft lip and palate. In: BerkowitzS, ed. Cleft Lip and Palate. Springer; 2006:257–261.
19.
KaranthTKWhittemoreKR. Middle-ear disease in children with cleft palate. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2018;45(6):1143–1151. doi:10.1016/j.anl.2018.04.012
20.
KawamotoTNittaHMurataKTodaETsukamotoNHasegawaMYamagataZKayamaFKishiROhyY, et al.Rationale and study design of the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS). BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):25.
21.
KesslerRCAndrewsGColpeLJHiripiEMroczekDKNormandS-LWaltersEEZaslavskyAM. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med. 2002;32(6):959–976.
22.
KogaHIidaKMaedaTTakahashiMFukushimaNGoshiT. Epidemiologic research on malformations associated with cleft lip and cleft palate in Japan. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0149773.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149773
23.
LansdownR. Cleft lip and palate: a prediction of psychological disfigurement?Br J Orthod. 1981;8(2):83–88.
24.
MaarseWBergeSPistoriusLVan BarneveldTKonMBreugemCMink van der MolenAB. Diagnostic accuracy of transabdominal ultrasound in detecting prenatal cleft lip and palate: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35(4):495–502.
25.
MarokakisSKasparianNAKennedySE. Prenatal counselling for congenital anomalies: a systematic review. Prenat Diagn. 2016;36(7):662–671.
26.
MauriënKVan de CasteeleENadjmiN. Psychological well-being and medical guidance of parents of children with cleft in Belgium during feeding problems of the child: a mixed method study. J Pediatr Nurs. 2019;48:e56–e66.
27.
MezawaHTomotakiAYamamoto-HanadaKIshitsukaKAyabeTKonishiMSaitoMYangLSuganumaNHiraharaF, et al.Prevalence of congenital anomalies in the Japan Environment and Children’s Study. J Epidemiol. 2019;29(7):247–256.
MosseyPACatillaEE. Global registry and database on craniofacial anomalies: Report of a WHO Registry Meeting on Craniofacial Anomalies. World Health Organization; 2003.
30.
MurrayLHentgesFHillJKarpfJMistryBKreutzMWoodallPMossTGoodacreT, Cleft Lip and Palate Study Team. The effect of cleft lip and palate, and the timing of lip repair on mother–infant interactions and infant development. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008;49(2):115–123.
31.
NatsumeNKawaiTKohamaGTeshimaTKochiSOhashiYEnomotoSIshiieMShigematsuTNakanofY, et al.Incidence of cleft lip or palate in 303738 Japanese babies born between 1994 and 1995. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;38(6):605–607.
32.
NatsumeNSuzukiTKawaiT. Maternal reactions to the birth of a child with cleft lip and/or palate. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;79(6):1003–1004.
33.
NelsonPGlennyAMKirkSCaressAL. Parents’ experiences of caring for a child with a cleft lip and/or palate: a review of the literature. Child Care Health Dev. 2012;38(1):6–20.
34.
NesRBRøysambEHaugeLJKornstadTLandoltMAIrgensLMEskedalLKristensenPVollrathME. Adaptation to the birth of a child with a congenital anomaly: a prospective longitudinal study of maternal well-being and psychological distress. Dev Psychol. 2014;50:1827.
35.
NetsiEPearsonRMMurrayLCooperPCraskeMGSteinA. Association of persistent and severe postnatal depression with child outcomes. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75(3):247–253.
36.
OkanoTMurataMMasujiFTamakiRNomuraJMiyaokaHKitamuraT.Validation and reliability of Japanese version of the EPDS (in Japanese). Arch Psychiatr Diagn Clin Eval. 1996;74:525–533.
37.
PopeAWTillmanKSnyderHT. Parenting stress in infancy and psychosocial adjustment in toddlerhood: a longitudinal study of children with craniofacial anomalies. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005;42(5):556–559.
38.
ReidJKilpatrickNReillyS. A prospective, longitudinal study of feeding skills in a cohort of babies with cleft conditions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006;43(6):702–709.
39.
StockNMCostaBWhitePRumseyN. Risk and protective factors for psychological distress in families following a diagnosis of cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020;57(1):88–98.
40.
StockNMHammondVOwenTKiffJShanlyARumseyN. Achieving consensus in the measurement of psychological adjustment to cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016;53(4):421–426. https://doi.org/10.1597/15-071
41.
StrandBHDalgardOSTambsKRognerudM. Measuring the mental health status of the Norwegian population: a comparison of the instruments SCL-25, SCL-10, SCL-5 and MHI-5 (SF-36). Nord J Psychiatry. 2003;57(2):113–118.
42.
SuzuiE. Impact of the Use of Ultrasound Scanning in Prenatal Examinations (in Japanese). Kawasaki Med J. 2004;14:59–70.
43.
TambsKMoumT. How well can a few questionnaire items indicate anxiety and depression?Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1993;87(5):364–367.
44.
TorgoLTorgoML. Package ‘DMwR’. Comprehensive R Archive Network. 2013.
45.
ZouG. A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(7):702–706.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
