Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective:

This study aimed to review the existing evidence regarding reconstruction of the alveolar cleft using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in terms of bone volume and bone height.

Design:

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Patients—Participants:

A systematic search was done. Randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials, where rhBMP-2 was used in the reconstruction of human alveolar cleft were included.

Interventions:

Reconstruction of alveolar cleft with rhBMP-2.

Main Outcome Measures:

Average bone volume formation and average bone height formation in the alveolar cleft. Mean difference was calculated and pooled by meta-analysis.

Results:

Of 709 identified articles, 5 studies met the inclusion criteria. The average bone volume formation was higher in the rhBMP-2 group than in the control group (61.11% vs 59.12%). The average bone height formation was higher in the control group compared to the rhBMP-2 group (75.4% vs 61.5%). The risk of bias in the selected articles was high. The meta-analysis showed that rhBMP-2 treatment may benefit bone formation compared to iliac crest graft (low certainty evidence; mean difference: −208.76; 95% confidence interval: −253.59 to −163.93; −I² = 0%).

Conclusions:

The results obtained in primary articles are promising but have a high risk of bias and have low quality of evidence; therefore, it is necessary to conduct controlled clinical trials with a greater number of patients to recommend the use of rhBMP-2 in the treatment of the alveolar cleft. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018077741.

Keywords

alveolar cleft alveolar bone grafting rhBMP-2 bone morphogenetic protein systematic review meta-analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alonso

Tanikawa

Freitas Rda

Canan

Jr Ozawa

Rocha

. Evaluation of maxillary alveolar reconstruction using a resorbable collagen sponge with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in cleft lip and palate patients. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2010;16(5):1183–1189.

Aurouze

Moller

Bevis

Rehm

Rudney

. The presurgical status of the alveolar cleft and success of secondary bone grafting. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000;37(2):179–184.

Bajaj

Wongworawat

Punjabi

. Management of alveolar clefts. J Craniofac Surg. 2003;14(6):840–846.

Boyne

Lilly

Marx

Moy

Nevins

Spagnoli

Triplett

. De novo bone induction by recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in maxillary sinus floor augmentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63(12):1693–1707.

Canan

Jr da Silva Freitas

Alonso

Tanikawa

Rocha

Coelho

. Human bone morphogenetic protein-2 use for maxillary reconstruction in cleft lip and palate patients. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23(6):1627–1633.

Carreira

Alves

Zambuzzi

Sogayar

Granjeiro

. Bone morphogenetic proteins: structure, biological function and therapeutic applications. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2014;561:64–73.

Collins

James

Mars

. Alveolar bone grafting: a review of 115 patients. Eur J Orthod. 1998;20(2):115–120.

Davies

Ochs

. Bone morphogenetic proteins in craniomaxillofacial surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2010;22(1):17–31.

de Moura

Hallac

Kane

Seaward

. Improving the evaluation of alveolar bone grafts with cone beam computerized tomography. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016;53(1):57–63.

10.

Dickinson

Ashley

Wasson

O’Hara

Gabbay

Heller

Bradley

. Reduced morbidity and improved healing with bone morphogenic protein-2 in older patients with alveolar cleft defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(1):209–217.

11.

Eppley

Sadove

. Management of alveolar cleft bone grafting—state of the art. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000;37(3):229–233.

12.

Gentile

Chiono

Carmagnola

Hatton

. An overview of poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA)-based biomaterials for bone tissue engineering. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(3):3640–3659.

13.

Guo

Zhang

Deacon

Chen

Zou

. Secondary bone grafting for alveolar cleft in children with cleft lip or cleft lip and palate. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;15(6):CD008050.

14.

Higgins

JPT

Altman

Sterne

JAC

. Chapter 8: assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins

JPT

Green

, ed. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. www.handbook.cochrane.org. Accessed June 15, 2018.

15.

Hogan

Shand

Heggie

Kilpatrick

. Canine eruption into grafted alveolar clefts: a retrospective study. Aust Dent J. 2003;48(2):119–124.

16.

Horswell

Henderson

. Secondary osteoplasty of the alveolar cleft defect. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61(9):1082–1090.

17.

Janssen

Weijs

Koole

Rosenberg

Meijer

. Tissue engineering strategies for alveolar cleft reconstruction: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(1):219–226.

18.

Khojasteh

Kheiri

Motamedian

Nadjmi

. Regenerative medicine in the treatment of alveolar cleft defect: a systematic review of the literature. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43(8):1608–1613.

19.

Langendam

Akl

Dahm

Glasziou

Guyatt

Schünemann

. Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews. Syst Rev. 2013;2:81.

20.

Wozney

. Delivering on the promise of bone morphogenetic proteins. Trends Biotechnol. 2001;19(7):255–265.

21.

Liang

Yen

Imahiyerobo

Sanborn

Yen

Nazarian

Jedrzejewski

Urata

Hammoudeh

. Three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography volumetric outcomes of rhBMP-2/demineralized bone matrix versus iliac crest bone graft for alveolar cleft reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(4):767–774.

22.

Macisaac

Rottgers

Davit

III Ford

Losee

Kumar

. Alveolar reconstruction in cleft patients: decreased morbidity and improved outcomes with supplemental demineralized bone matrix and cancellous allograft. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(3):625–632.

23.

Mehta

Blagg

Willcockson

Gociman

Yamashiro

Siddiqi

. Cost-effectiveness analysis of demineralized bone matrix and rhBMP-2 versus autologous iliac crest bone grafting in alveolar cleft patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(3):737–743.

24.

Moher

Liberati

Tetzlaff

Altman

. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(7):264–269.

25.

Mostafa

Talwar

Shahin

Unsworth

Major

Doschak

. Cleft palate reconstruction using collagen and nanofiber scaffold incorporating bone morphogenetic protein in rats. Tissue Eng Part A. 2015;21(1-2):85–95.

26.

Neovius

Lemberger

Docherty Skogh

Hilborn

Engstrand

. Alveolar bone healing accompanied by severe swelling in cleft children treated with bone morphogenetic protein-2 delivered by hydrogel. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66(1):37–42.

27.

Rengachary

. Bone morphogenetic proteins: basic concepts. Neurosurg Focus. 2002;13(6):1–6.

28.

Rezvani

Venugopal

Urbanska

Mills

Ramakrishna

Mozafari

. A bird’s eye view on the use of electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: current state-of-the-art, emerging directions and future trends. Nanomedicine. 2016;12(7):2181–2200.

29.

Ryan

Hill

. How to GRADE the quality of the evidence. 2016. http://cccrg.cochrane.org/author-resources. Accessed December 15, 2018.

30.

Santiago

Schuster

Levy-Bercowski

. Management of the alveolar cleft. Clin Plast Surg. 2014;41(2):219–232.

31.

Segura-Castillo

Aguirre-Camacho

Gonzalez-Ojeda

Michel-Perez

. Reduction of bone resorption by the application of fibrin glue in the reconstruction of the alveolar cleft. J Craniofac Surg. 2005;16(1):105–112.

32.

Seifeldin

. Is alveolar cleft reconstruction still controversial? (review of literature). Saudi Dent J. 2016;28(1):3–11.

33.

Shirota

Kurabayashi

Ogura

Seki

Maki

Shintani

. Analysis of bone volume using computer simulation system for secondary bone graft in alveolar cleft. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;39(9):904–908.

34.

Tai

Sutherland

McFadden

. Prospective analysis of secondary alveolar bone grafting using computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;58(11):1241–1249.

35.

Van der Meij

AJW

Baart

Prahl-Andersen

Valk

Kostense

Tuinzing

. Bone volume after secondary bone grafting in unilateral and bilateral clefts determined by computed tomography scans. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2001;92(2):136–141.

36.

Van Hout

Mink van der Molen

ABM

Breugem

Koole

Van Cann

. Reconstruction of the alveolar cleft: can growth factor-aided tissue engineering replace autologous bone grafting? a literature review and systematic review of results obtained with bone morphogenetic protein-2. Clin Oral Investig. 2011;15(3):297–303.

37.

Wehrhan

Amann

Molenberg

Lutz

Neukam

Schlegel

. Critical size defect regeneration using PEG-mediated BMP-2 gene delivery and the use of cell occlusive barrier membranes—the osteopromotive principle revisited. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(8):910–920.

38.

Wikesjo

Huang

Polimeni

Qahash

. Bone morphogenetic proteins: a realistic alternative to bone grafting for alveolar reconstruction. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2007;19(4):535–551.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.09 MB

Alveolar Cleft Reconstruction Using Morphogenetic Protein (rhBMP-2): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis