BerkowitzS. A comparison of treatment results in complete bilateral cleft lip and palate using conservative approach versus Millard-Latham PSOT procedure. Semin Orthod. 1996;2(3):169–184.
2.
BerkowitzS. Why hasn’t Cutting and Grayson done a longitudinal study to show why nasoalveolar molding should not be used?Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019;56(1):141.
3.
ChanKTHayesCShustermanSMullikenJBWillLA. The effects of active infant orthopedics on occlusal relationships in unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2003;40(5):511–517.
4.
FloresRLShetyePR. The nasoalveolar molding (NAM) treatment protocol. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019;56(8):1124–1125.
5.
FriedeHEnemarkH. Long-term evidence for favorable midfacial growth after delayed hard palate repair in UCLP patients. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001;38(4):323–329.
6.
GraberTM. Craniofacial morphology in cleft palate and cleft lip deformities. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1949;88(3):359–369.
7.
GrisiusTMSpolyarJLJacksonITBello-RojasGDajaniK. Assessment of cleft lip and palate patients treated with presurgical orthopedic correction and either primary bone grafts, gingivoperiosteoplasty, or without alveolar grafting procedures. J Craniofac Surg. 2006;17(3):468–473.
8.
HathawayRREppleyBLHennonDKNelsonCLSadoveAM. Primary alveolar cleft bone grafting in unilateral cleft lip and palate: arch dimensions at age 8. J Craniofac Surg. 1999;10(1):58–67.
9.
HenkelKOGundlachKK. Analysis of primary gingivoperiosteopolasty in alveolar cleft repair. Part I: facial growth. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1997;25(5):266–269.
10.
LathamRA. Bilateral cleft lip and palate: improved maxillary and dental development. Plast Recontr Surg. 2017;119(1):287–297.
11.
ReiserE. Cleft size and maxillary arch dimensions in unilateral cleft lip and palate and cleft palate. (Doctoral dissertation). Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis; 2011.
12.
ScottJH. The growth of the human face. Proc Roy Soc Med. 1954;47(2):91–100.
13.
SpolyarJLHnatiukMShaheenKWMertzJKHandlerLFJarialRRoldànJC. Tessier No. 3 and No. 4 clefts: sequential treatment in infancy by pre-surgical orthopedic skeletal contraction, comprehensive reconstruction, and novel surgical lengthening of the ala base-canthal distance. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43(7):1261–1268.
14.
SpolyarJLJacksonITPhillipsRJLSullivanWGClaymanLVyasST. The Latham technique: contemporary presurgical orthopedics for the complete oral cleft, technique and preliminary evaluation—a bone marker study. Perspect Plast Surg. 1992;6:179–210.
15.
SpolyarJLRoldànJC. Changes in nose symmetry in unilateral cleft lip and palate treated by differing pre-surgical assistance: an objective assessment of primary repair. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43(6):779–789.
