Routine postoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis remains controversial due to the hazards of radiation exposure. The extent to which postoperative head CTs are performed remains unknown. Therefore, we sought to measure the use of postoperative CTs in this population.
Design:
The authors reviewed insurance claims from OptumInsight, using Current Procedural Terminology codes to identify procedures and postoperative imaging. Multilevel logistic regression was used to describe the odds of undergoing postoperative CTs, adjusting for patient and provider covariates.
Participants:
Craniosynostosis patients who underwent reconstruction between 2001 and 2017 were reviewed. Patients older than 5 years at surgery, postoperative lengths of stay >15 days, syndromic diagnoses, operative complications within 30 days of surgery, and cranial bone grafting merited exclusion.
Main Outcome Measure:
Odds of postoperative head CTs after cranial vault reconstruction.
Results:
In this cohort (n = 1150), 326 (28.4%) patients underwent postoperative head CTs. The number of CTs ranged from 0 to 14. Older age at surgery (odds ratio [OR]: 1.32, P = .002), increasing years of follow-up (OR: 1.12, P < .001), and increasing comorbidities (OR: 1.21, P = .017) were associated with postoperative CTs. After adjusting for patient factors, provider factors accounted for 31.3% of variation in imaging.
Conclusions:
Over a quarter of patients underwent head CTs following reconstruction, and provider factors accounted for a large percentage of the variation. Given the risks of radiation, neurosurgeons and craniofacial surgeons face a critical need to establish postoperative imaging protocols to reduce unnecessary imaging in these vulnerable patients.
AlperovichMVyasRMStaffenbergDA. Is craniosynostosis repair keeping up with the times? Results from the largest national survey on craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(6):1909–1913.
2.
AzadTDVailDO’ConnellCHanSSVeeravaguARatliffJK. Geographic variation in the surgical management of lumbar spondylolisthesis: characterizing practice patterns and outcomes. Spine J. 2018;18(12):2232–2238.
3.
BeecherHK. Ethics and clinical research. N Engl J Med. 1966;274(24):1354–1360.
4.
BennettKGKelleyBPVickADLeeJSGunaseelanVBrummettCMWaljeeJF. Persistent opioid use and high-risk prescribing in body contouring patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(6):8843e–8891e.
5.
BrandelMGDalle OreCLReidCMZhangWWZhuWKpaduwaCSLanceSMeltzerHSGosmanAA. A novel method for quantifying intracranial volume change by distraction osteogenesis for craniosynostosis. Ann Plast Surg. 2018;80(suppl 5):S251–S256.
6.
BrennerDEllistonCHallEBerdonW. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(2):289–296.
7.
BrennerDJHallEJ. Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(22):2277–2284.
8.
BrownZDBeyAKBonfieldCMWestrickACKellyKKellyKWellonsJC3rd. Racial disparities in health care access among pediatric patients with craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016;18(3):269–274.
9.
BuchananEPXueYXueASOlshinkaALamS. Multidisciplinary care of craniosynostosis. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2017;10:263–270.
10.
ChervenakFAMcCulloughLB. The moral foundation of medical leadership: the professional virtues of the physician as fiduciary of the patient. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184(5):875–879; discussion 879-880.
11.
ChodickGRonckersCMShalevVRonE. Excess lifetime cancer mortality risk attributable to radiation exposure from computed tomography examinations in children. Isr Med Assoc J. 2007;9(8):584–587.
12.
ChungSAYunISMoonJWLeeJB. Ophthalmic findings in children with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis treated by expansion cranioplasty. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(1):79–83.
FeudtnerCChristakisDAConnellFA. Pediatric deaths attributable to complex chronic conditions: a population-based study of Washington State, 1980-1997. Pediatrics. 2000;106(1 Pt 2):205–209.
Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation and National Research Council. Washington, DC; The National Academies Press; 2006.
17.
JanjuaMBHoffmanCESouweidaneMM. Contemporary management and surveillance strategy after shunt or endoscopic third ventriculostomy procedures for hydrocephalus. J Clin Neurosci. 2017;45:18–23.
18.
JoSSkolnickGBNaidooSDSmythMDPatelKB. Postsurgical changes in osseous dysmorphology of the midface and mandible in unilateral coronal craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30(1):127–132.
19.
JubbalKTAgrawalNHollierLHJr. Analysis of morbidity, readmission, and reoperation after craniosynostosis repair in children. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;28(2):401–405.
20.
KobetsAJAmmarANakhlaJScocoANasserRGoodrichJTAbbottR. Virtual modeling, stereolithography, and intraoperative CT guidance for the optimization of sagittal synostosis reconstruction: a technical note. Childs Nerv Syst. 2018;34(5):965–970.
MajidinejadSTaherianKEsmailianMKhazaeiMSamaieV. Oral midazolam-ketamine versus midazolam alone for procedural sedation of children undergoing computed tomography: a randomized clinical trial. Emerg (Tehran). 2015;3(2):64–69.
23.
MargenthalerJAMeierJDVirgoKSJohnsonDYGoshimaKChanDHandlerBSJohnsonFE. Geographic variation in posttreatment surveillance intensity for patients with cutaneous melanoma. Am J Surg. 2003;186(2):194–200.
24.
MasseranoBWooASSkolnickGBNaidooSDProctorMRSmythMDPatelKB. The temporal region in unilateral coronal craniosynostosis: fronto-orbital advancement versus endoscopy-assisted strip craniectomy. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018;55(3):423–429.
25.
McCahillLESingleRMAiello BowlesEJFeigelsonHSJamesTABarneyTEngelJMOnitiloAA. Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery. JAMA. 2012;307(5):467–475.
26.
McCarthyJGWarrenSMBernsteinJBurnettWCunninghamMLEdmondJCFigueroaAAKapp-SimonKALabowBIPeterson-FalzoneSJ, et al.Parameters of care for craniosynostosis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012;49(suppl 49):1S–24S.
27.
MeulepasJMRonckersCMSmetsAMJBNievelsteinRAJGradowskaPLeeCJahnenAvan StratenMde WitMYZonnenbergB, et al.Radiation exposure from pediatric CT scans and subsequent cancer risk in the Netherlands. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111(3):256–263.
28.
MigliorettiDLJohnsonEWilliamsAGreenleeRTWeinmannSSolbergLIFeigelsonHSRoblinDFlynnMJVannemanN, et al.The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(8):700–707.
29.
MontoyaJCEckelLGDeLoneDRKotsenasALDiehnFEYuLBartleyACCarterREMcColloughCHFletcherJG. Low-Dose CT for Craniosynostosis: Preserving Diagnostic Benefit with Substantial Radiation Dose Reduction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017;38(4): 676–677.
30.
MundingerGSSkladmanRWengerTBirgfeldCCGrussJSLeeAEllenbogenRHopperRA. Defining and correcting asymmetry in isolated unilateral frontosphenoidal synostosis: differences in orbital shape, facial scoliosis, and skullbase twist compared to unilateral coronal synostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(1):29–35.
31.
NoutEvan BezooijenJSKoudstaalMJVeenlandJFHopWCWolviusEBvan der WalKG. Orbital change following Le Fort III advancement in syndromic craniosynostosis: quantitative evaluation of orbital volume, infra-orbital rim and globe position. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012;40(3):223–228.
32.
PersingJA. MOC-PS(SM) CME article: management considerations in the treatment of craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(4 suppl):1–11.
33.
RanganathanKRampazzoAHashmiAMuraszkoKStrahleJVerclerCJBuchmanSR. The role of preoperative imaging in the management of nonsyndromic lambdoid craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(1):36–39.
34.
RekateHLBlitzAM. Hydrocephalus in children. Handb Clin Neurol. 2016;136:1261–1273.
35.
RogersDL. A review of pediatric idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2014;61(3):579–590.
36.
RothenbergPEHughesBDAmirkhosraviFOnaiwuBPOkerekeIC. Factors during training which predict future use of minimally invasive thoracic surgery. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2018;35:149–152.
37.
RothenbergPEHughesBDAmirkhosraviFOnaiwuBPOkerekeIC. Craniometric analysis of endoscopic suturectomy for bilateral coronal craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;35:149–152.
SellersMMKeeleLJSharokyCEWirtallaCBaileyEAKelzRR. Association of surgical practice patterns and clinical outcomes with surgeon training in university- or nonuniversity-based residency program. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(5):418–425.
40.
SergesketterARElsamadicyAALubkinDTKemenyHHarwardSCKrucoffKBKrucoffMOFuchsHThompsonEMAlloriAC, et al.Socioeconomic factors, perioperative complications, and 30-day readmission rates associated with delayed cranial vault reconstruction for craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(7):1767–1771.
41.
SheppardJPNguyenTAlkhalidYBeckettJSSalamonNYangI. Risk of brain tumor induction from pediatric head CT procedures: a systematic literature review. Brain Tumor Res Treat. 2018;6(1):1–7.
42.
SrinivasanMBhaskarSCarlsonDW. Variation in procedural sedation practices among children’s hospitals. Hosp Pediatr. 2015;5(3):148–153.
TaylorJAPaligaJTWesAMTahiriYGoldsteinJAWhitakerLABartlettSP. A critical evaluation of long-term aesthetic outcomes of fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remodeling in nonsyndromic unicoronal craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(1):220–231.
van der GriendBFListerNAMcKenzieIMMartinNRaggPGSheppardSJDavidsonAJ. Postoperative mortality in children after 101,885 anesthetics at a tertiary pediatric hospital. Anesth Analg. 2011;112(6):1440–1447.
47.
VerclerCJ. Surgical ethics: surgical virtue and more. Narrat Inq Bioeth. 2015;5(1):45–51.
48.
WangJCNagyLDemkeJC. Syndromic craniosynostosis. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2016;24(4):531–543.
49.
WarrenSMProctorMRBartlettSPBlountJPBuchmanSRBurnettWFearonJAKeatingRMuraszkoKMRogersGF, et al.Parameters of care for craniosynostosis: craniofacial and neurologic surgery perspectives. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(3):731–737.
50.
WhippeyAKostandoffGMaHKChengJThabaneLPaulJ. Predictors of unanticipated admission following ambulatory surgery in the pediatric population: a retrospective case-control study. Paediatr Anaesth. 2016;26(8):831–837.
51.
YangBNiJLiB. 3D morphological change of skull base and fronto-temporal soft-tissue in the patients with unicoronal craniosynostosis after fronto-orbital advancement. Childs Nerv Syst. 2018;34(5):947–955.
52.
YueELMecklerGDFleischmanRJSeldenNRBardoDMChu O’ConnorAKVuETFuRSpiroDM. Test characteristics of quick brain MRI for shunt evaluation in children: an alternative modality to avoid radiation. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015;15(4):420–426.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
