The importance of psychosocial aspects of care has received growing recognition in recent years. However, the evidence base for psychosocial intervention remains limited. Specialist clinicians working in cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) services hold a wealth of knowledge and experience yet to be elicited. The aims of this study were to identify common psychosocial challenges and potential risk and/or protective factors for psychosocial distress from the perspective of specialist clinicians and to establish the types of interventions currently being delivered in practice.
Design:
Individual interviews with 17 clinical nurse specialists and 19 specialist clinical psychologists, representing all 16 UK CL/P surgical sites. Data were analyzed using inductive content analysis.
Results:
Numerous psychosocial challenges affecting individuals with CL/P and their families were identified across the life span. Risk factors were predominantly contextual in nature, while protective factors appeared amenable to intervention. Participants drew upon a range of therapeutic models and approaches to guide formulation and intervention, while acknowledging the lack of evidence to support these approaches in CL/P populations specifically.
Conclusions:
Findings have important implications for the way in which psychosocial support for CL/P and related conditions is delivered and evaluated. A framework for the standardized assessment of holistic individual and familial well-being is proposed. Suggestions for increasing the evidence base for specific psychosocial interventions are made, including enhanced family functioning; social, emotional, and appearance concerns; treatment decision-making; and screening for psychosocial and developmental issues.
Appearance Research Collaboration. Identifying the Psychosocial Factors and Processes Contributing to Successful Adjustment to Disfiguring Conditions. Bristol, United Kingdom: Centre for Appearance Research, University of the West of England; 2009.
2.
AspinallCL.Dealing with the prenatal diagnosis of clefting: a parent’s perspective. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2002;39(2):183–187.
3.
AustinCAMohottigeDSudoreRLSmithAKHansonLC. Tools to promote shared decision making in serious illness: a systematic review. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(7):1213–1221.
4.
BergerZEDaltonLJ. Coping with a cleft: psychosocial adjustment of adolescents with a cleft lip and palate and their parents. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009;46(4):435–443.
5.
BessellAHooperLShawWCReillySReidJGlennyAM. Feeding interventions for growth and development in infants with cleft lip, cleft palate, or cleft lip and palate. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(2):CD003315.
6.
BessellASellDWhitingPRoulstoneSAlberyLPerssonMVerhoevenABurkeMNessAR. Speech and language therapy interventions for children with cleft palate: a systematic review. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2013;50(1):e1–e17.
7.
BogartKRHemmeschAR. Benefits of support conferences for parents of and people with Moebius syndrome. Stigma Health. 2016;1(2):109–121.
8.
British Psychological Society. Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Management of Invasive and/or Distressing Procedures With Children. Leicester, United Kingdom: British Psychological Society; 2010.
9.
ChuPYMaslowGRvon IsenburgMChungRJ. Systematic review of the impact of transition interventions for adolescents with chronic illness on transfer from pediatric to adult healthcare. J Pediatr Nursing. 2015;30(5):e19–27.
10.
ChuacharoenRRitthagolWHunsrisakhunJNilmanatK. Felt needs of parents who have a 0- to 3-month-old child with a cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009;46(3):252–257.
11.
ClarkeAThompsonARJenkinsonERumseyNNewellR. CBT for Appearance Anxiety: Psychosocial Interventions for Anxiety Due to Visible Difference. Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
12.
CollettBRSpeltzML. Social-emotional development of infants and young children with orofacial clefts. Infant Young Children. 2006;19(4):261–291.
13.
DemirTKaracetinGBaghakiSAydinY. Psychiatric assessment of children with nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2011;33(6):594–603.
14.
DesparsJPeterCBorghiniAPierrehumbertBHabersaatSMüller-NixCAnsermetFHohlfeldJ. Impact of a cleft lip and/or palate on maternal stress and attachment representations. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011;48(4):419–424.
15.
DiedrichsPCHalliwellE. School-based interventions to promote positive body image and the acceptance of diversity in appearance. In: RumseyNHarcourtD, eds. The Oxford Handbook of the Psychology of Appearance. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2012:531–550.
16.
DittmarHHalliwellEIveS. Does Barbie make girls want to be thin? The effect of experimental exposure to images of dolls on the body image of 5- to 8-year-old girls. Dev Psychol. 2006;42(2):283–292.
17.
EisermanW.Unique outcomes and positive contributions associated with facial difference: expanding research and practice. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001;38(3):236–244.
18.
FeragenKBKvalemILRumseyNBorgeAI. Adolescents with and without a facial difference: The role of friendships and social acceptance in perceptions of appearance and emotional resilience. Body Image. 2010;7(4):271–279.
19.
FeragenKBSærvoldTKAuknerRStockNM. Speech, language and reading in 10-year-olds with cleft: associations with teasing, satisfaction with speech and psychological adjustment. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017;54(2):153–165.
20.
FeragenKBStockNM. When there is more than a cleft: psychological adjustment when a cleft is associated with an additional condition. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014;51(1):5–14.
21.
GrahamCDGouickJKrahéCGillandersD. A systematic review of the use of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) in chronic disease and long-term conditions. Clin Psychol Rev. 2016;46:46–58.
22.
GriffithsCWilliamsonHZucchelliFParaskevaNMossTP. A systematic review of the effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for body image dissatisfaction and weight self-stigma in adults. J Contemp Psychother. 2018;48(4):189–204.
23.
GuestECostaBMcCarthyGCunniffeCStockNM. The experiences and support needs of grandparents of children born with cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019. doi:10.1177/1055665619850709.
24.
HarcourtDHamletCFeragenKBGarcia-LopezLJMasnariOMendesJNobileFOkkerseJPittermannASpillekom-van KoulilSet al.The provision of specialist psychosocial support for people with visible differences: a European survey. Body Image. 2018;25:35–39.
25.
HavstamCLaaksoKRingsbergKC. Making sense of the cleft: young adults’ accounts of growing up with a cleft and deviant speech. J Health Psychol. 2011;16(1):22–30.
26.
HearstDMiddletonJAOwenTZefferettA. Teasing and Bullying in Children With Clefts: A Framework for Formulation. London, United Kingdom: Psychology Special Interest Group; 2008.
27.
HolmanNKeenC. School Change Day. Presented at the North West England, the Isle of Man and North Wales Cleft Lip and Palate Network meeting; June 2012; Manchester, United Kingdom.
KnapkeSCBenderPProwsCSchultzJRSaalHM. Parental perspectives of children born with cleft lip and/or palate: a qualitative assessment of suggestions for healthcare improvements and interventions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2010;47(2):143–150.
30.
KnightJCassellCHMeyerREStraussRP. Academic outcomes of children with isolated orofacial clefts compared with children without a major birth defect. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2015;52(3):259–268.
31.
LalorJGDevaneDBegleyCM. Unexpected diagnosis of fetal abnormality: women’s encounters with caregivers. Birth. 2007;34(1):80–88.
32.
LawDLaffanA. What Good Looks Like in Psychological Services for Children, Young People, and Their Families. Leicester, United Kingdom: British Psychological Society; 2015.
33.
LiddleMJBakerSRSmithKGThompsonAR. Psychosocial outcomes in orthognathic surgery: a review of the literature. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2015;52(4):458–470.
34.
MarcussonAAkerlindIPaulinG. Quality of life in adults with repaired complete cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001;38(4):379–385.
35.
MarshmanZBakerSRBradburyJHallMJRoddHD. The psychosocial impact of oral conditions during transition to secondary education. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2009;10(4):176–180.
36.
MercerAO’CurrySDonnanJStedmonJReedJGriggsH.Delivering psychological services for children and young people with physical health needs and their families. In: British Psychological Society. What Good Looks Like in Psychological Services for Children, Young People and their Families. Leicester, United Kingdom: British Psychological Society; 2015.
37.
MurrayLHentgesFHillJKarpfJBeejalMKreutzMWoodallPMossTGoodacreTthe Cleft Lip and Palate Study Team. The effect of cleft lip and palate and the timing of lip repair on mother-infant interactions and infant development. Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008;49(2):115–123.
38.
National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Common Mental Health Problems: Identification and Pathways to Care (CG123). London, United Kingdom: National Institute for Clinical Excellence; 2001.
39.
NelsonPAGlennyAMKirkSACaressAL. Parents’ experiences of caring for a child with a cleft lip and/or palate: a review of the literature. Child Care Health Dev. 2012;38(1):6–20.
40.
NelsonPAKirkSACaressLGlennyAM. Parents’ emotional and social experiences of caring for a child through cleft treatment. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(3):346–359.
41.
NeuendorfKA. The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2017.
NormanAPerssonMStockNMRumseyNSandyJWaylenAEdwardsZHammondVPartridgeLNessA. The effectiveness of psychosocial intervention for individuals with cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2015;52(3):301–310.
44.
OstLG.The efficacy of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Behav Res Ther. 2014;61:105–121.
45.
Queiroz-HerkrathAPHerkrathFJRebeloMAVettoreMV. Measurement of health-related and oral health-related quality of life among individuals with nonsyndromic orofacial clefts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2015;52(2):157–172.
46.
RumseyNHarcourtD.Body image and disfigurement: issues and interventions. Body Image. 2004;1(1):83–97.
47.
SandyJWilliamsAMildinhallSMurphyTBearnDShawBSellDDevlinBMurphyJ. The Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) cleft lip and palate study. Br J Orthod. 1998;25(1):21–30.
48.
SainsburyDCGDaviesAWrenYSouthbyLChadhaASlatorRStockNM, the Cleft Multidisciplinary Collaborative. The cleft multidisciplinary collaborative: establishing a network to support cleft lip and palate research in the United Kingdom. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019;56(4):502–507.
49.
SearleANevillePRyanSWaylenA. The role of the Clinical Nurse Specialist from the perspective of parents of children born with cleft lip and/or palate in the United Kingdom: a qualitative study. Clin Nurse Spec. 2018;32(3):121–128.
50.
SearleARyanSWaylenA. Health professional communication and the diagnosis and care of infants born with cleft lip and palate in the UK. J Neonatal Nurs. 2016;22(5):236–243.
51.
StockNMAnwarHSandyJRRumseyN.Centralisation of cleft lip and palate services in the United Kingdom: the views of adult “returners”. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018;55(5):676–681.
52.
StockNMCostaBWhitePRumseyN. Risk and Protective Factors for Psychological Distress in Families Following a Diagnosis of Cleft Lip and/or Palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665619862457.
53.
StockNMFeragenKBMossTPRumseyN. Toward a conceptual and methodological shift in craniofacial research. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018;55(1):105–111.
54.
StockNMFeragenKBRumseyN. “It doesn’t all just stop at 18”: psychological adjustment and support needs of adults born with cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2015;52(5):543–554.
55.
StockNMFeragenKB. Psychological adjustment to cleft lip and/or palate: a narrative review of the literature. Psychol Health, 2016;31(7):777–813.
56.
StockNMHammondVOwenTKiffJShanlyARumseyN. Achieving consensus in the measurement of psychological adjustment to cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016;53(5):421–426.
57.
StockNMRidleyM. Young person and parent perspectives on the impact of cleft lip and/or palate within an educational setting. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018;55(4):607–614.
58.
StockNMStonemanKCunniffeCRumseyN. The psychosocial impact of cleft lip and/or palate on unaffected siblings. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016;53(6):670–682.
59.
WalshF. Family resilience: a developmental systems framework. Eur J Dev Psychol. 2016;13(3):313–324.
60.
WilliamsonHGriffithsCHarcourtD. Developing young person’s Face IT: online psychosocial support for adolescents struggling with conditions or injuries affecting their appearance. Health Psychol Open. 2015;2(2). doi:10.1177/2055102915619092.
61.
WrightBEdgintonE. Evidence-based parenting interventions to promote secure attachment: Findings from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Glob Pediatr Health. 2016;3. doi:10.1177/2333794X16661888.
62.
ZeedykMSGallacherJHendersonMHopeGHusbandBLindsayK. Negotiating the transition from primary to secondary school: perceptions of pupils, parents and teachers. Sch Psychol Int. 2003;24(1):67–79.
63.
ZeytinoğluSDaveyMPCrerandCFisherKAkyilY.Experiences of couples caring for a child born with cleft lip and/or palate: impact of the timing of diagnosis. J Marital Fam Ther. 2016;43(1):82–99.
64.
ZucchelliFDonnellyOWilliamsonHHooperN. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for people experiencing appearance-related distress associated with a visible difference: a rationale and review of relevant research. J Cognit Psychother. 2018;32(3):171–183.
