The goal of cleft therapy has progressed from simply correcting the deformity to uplifting the patient’s quality of life (QoL). At the end of comprehensive treatment, a patient with cleft lip and palate (CLP) should report with satisfactory QoL scores in all domains such as aesthetics, speech, function, and psychology.
Objective:
To develop and validate a novel, disease-specific questionnaire designed in 2 regional languages to assess the QoL in young adult patients with CLP of South India following comprehensive treatment.
Methods:
A preliminary questionnaire was created from the literature review and patient interviews, considering regional sociodemographic conditions. The questionnaire was then validated by subject experts and pilot tested. The resultant tool was implemented on patients at treatment completion. Data collected were assimilated for statistical evaluation.
Results:
The questionnaire was deemed reliable (Cronbach α = .854 and test–retest reliability, κ = 0.8) and was administered to 100 young adult patients with CLP (mean age: 22 years). A large majority (83%) of the population felt more confident about themselves, with positive responses to familial relations, social interaction, and self-image. About 25% of the patients faced problems with speech regularly, while a majority of patients did not face problems with chewing and swallowing. Nearly 60% of patients were fully satisfied with their facial appearance, while others had concerns about their lip and nose aesthetics. The results were descriptive of the local population.
Conclusions:
Most patients achieved satisfactory QoL in all domains following comprehensive multispeciality therapy. The novel tool is simple, reliable, and can be adapted to homogenous population groups.
AndersonSAdamsGPlautV. The cultural grounding of personal relationship: the importance of attractiveness in everyday life. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008;95(2):352–368. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.2.352.
2.
BabuccuOLatifogluOAtabayKOralNCosanB. Sociological aspects of rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2003;27(1):44–49.
3.
BennettEPhilipsC. Assessment of health-related quality of life for patients with severe skeletal disharmony: a review of the issues. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1999;14(1):65–75.
4.
BergerZDaltonL. Coping with a cleft II: factors associated with psychosocial adjustment of adolescents with a cleft lip and palate and their parents. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011;48(1):82–90. doi:10.1597/08-094.
5.
BergerZDaltonL. Coping with a cleft: psychosocial adjustment of adolescents with a cleft lip and palate and their parents. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009;46(4):435–443. doi:10.1597/08-093.1.
6.
BroderHSmithFStraussR. Effects of visible and invisible orofacial defects on self-perception and adjustment across developmental eras and gender. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1994;31(6):429–436. doi:10.1597/1545-1569(1994)031<0429: eovaio>2.3.co;2.
7.
CanadyJW. Emotional effects of plastic surgery on the adolescent with a cleft. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1995;32(2):120–124.
8.
CanfieldMHoneinMYuskivNXingJMaiCCollinsJDevineOPetriniJRamadhaniTHobbsCet al.National estimates and race/ethnic-specific variation of selected birth defects in the United States, 1999-2001. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2006;76(11):747–756. doi:10.1002/bdra.20294.
9.
CanoSJKlassenAPusicAL. The science behind quality of life measurement: a primer for plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123(3):98e–106e.
10.
EcksteinDWuRAkinbiyiTSilverLTaubP. Measuring quality of life in cleft lip and palate patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(5):518e–526e. doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e31822b6a67.
11.
EdwardsTCPatrickDLTopolskiTDAspinallCLMouradianWESpeltzML. Approaches to craniofacial-specific quality of life assessment in adolescents. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005;42(1):19–24.
12.
GkantidisNPapamanouDChristouPTopouzelisN. Aesthetic outcome of cleft lip and palate treatment. Perceptions of patients, families, and health professionals compared to the general public. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013;41(7):e105–e110. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2012.11.034.
13.
HarrisDLCarrAT. Prevalence of concern about physical appearance in the general population. Br J Plast Surg. 2001;54(3):223–226.
14.
HasanzadehNKhodaMJahanbinAVatankhahM. Coping strategies and psychological distress among mothers of patients with nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate and the family impact of this disorder. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(2):441–445. doi:10.1097/scs.0000000000000483.
15.
HellerATidmarshWPlessI. The psychosocial functioning of young adults born with cleft lip or palate. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1981;20(7):459–465. doi:10.1177/000992288102000706.
16.
HuntOBurdenDHepperPJohnstonC. The psychosocial effects of cleft lip and palate: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2005;27(3):274–285. doi:10.1093/ejo/cji004.
17.
JacobsonA. Psychological aspects of dentofacial esthetics and orthognathic surgery. Angle Orthod. 1984;54(1):18–35.
18.
JacobsonBRosensteinS. Cleft lip and palate: the orthodontist’s youngest patient. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1986;90(1):63–66.
19.
Kapp-SimonKSimonDKristovichS. Self-perception, social skills, adjustment, and inhibition in young adolescents with craniofacial anomalies. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;29(4):352–356. doi:10.1597/1545-1569(1992)029<0352: spssaa>2.3.co;2.
20.
KhattakZBeningtonPKhambayBGreenLWalkerFAyoubA. An assessment of the quality of care provided to orthognathic surgery patients through a multidisciplinary clinic. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012;40(3):243–247.
21.
KingNMTongMCKLingJYK. The ectrodactyly-ectodermal dysplasia-clefting syndrome: a literature review and case report. Quintessence Int. 1994;25(10):731–736.
22.
KlassenATsangarisEForrestCWongKPusicACanoSSyedIDuaMKainthSJohnsonJet al.Quality of life of children treated for cleft lip and/or palate: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65(5):547–557.
23.
KlassenARiffKLongmireNAlbertAAllenGCAydinMABakerSBCanoSJChanAJCourtemancheDJet al.Psychometric findings and normative values for the CLEFT-Q based on 2434 children and young adult patients with cleft lip and/or palate from 12 countries. Can Med Assoc J. 2018;190(15):E455–E462. doi:10.1503/cmaj.170289.
24.
MarcussonAAkerlindIPaulinG. Quality of life in adults with repaired complete cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001;38(4):379–385. doi:10.1597/1545-1569(2001)038<0379: qoliaw>2.0.co;2.
25.
MishraDSinghH. Kuppuswamy’s socioeconomic status scale—a revision. Indian J Pediatr. 2003;70(3):273–274.
26.
MouradianWEdwardsTTopolskiTRumseyNPatrickD. Are we helping children? Outcome assessments in craniofacial care. In: ParensE, ed. Surgically Shaping Children: Essays on Technology, Ethics, and the Pursuit of Normality. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins; 2006:141–156.
27.
NoarJH. Questionnaire survey of attitudes and concerns of patients with cleft lip and palate and their parents. Cleft Palate J. 1991;28(3):279–284.
28.
NoorSMusaS. Assessment of patients’ level of satisfaction with cleft treatment using the cleft evaluation profile. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007;44(3):292–303.
29.
PatrickDTopolskiTEdwardsTAspinallCLKapp-SimonKARumseyNJStraussRPThomasCR. Measuring the quality of life of youth with facial differences. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007;44(5):538–547. doi:10.1597/06-072.1.
30.
PatrickDLTopolskiTDEdwardsTCAspinallCLKapp-SimonKARumseyNJStraussRPThomasCR. Measuring the quality of life of youth with facial differences. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007;44(5):538–547.
31.
Pitak-ArnnopPHemprichADhanuthaiKYildirimVPauschN. Panel and patient perceptions of nasal aesthetics after secondary cleft rhinoplasty with versus without columellar grafting. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2011;39(5):319–325.
32.
RamstadTOttemEShawW. Psychosocial adjustment in Norwegian adults who had undergone standardised treatment of complete cleft lip and palate II. Self-reported problems and concerns with appearance. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1995;29(4):329–336. doi:10.3109/02844319509008968.
33.
RichmanLHarperD. Personality profiles of physically impaired young adults. J Clin Psychol. 1980;36(3):668–671. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(198007)36:3<668:: aid-jclp2270360310>3.0.co;2-l.
34.
RustemeyerJGregersenJ. Quality of life in orthognathic surgery patients: post-surgical improvements in aesthetics and self-confidence. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012;40(5):400–404.
35.
SinkoKJagschRPrechtlVWatzingerFHollmannKBaumannA. Evaluation of esthetic, functional, and quality-of-life outcome in adult cleft lip and palate patients. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005;42(4):355–361.
36.
SpeltzMEndrigaMFisherPMasonC. Early predictors of attachment in infants with cleft lip and/or palate. Child Dev. 1997;68(1):12. doi:10.2307/1131921.
37.
SpringerINWiltfangJKowalskiJTRussoPASchulzeMBeckerSWolfartS. Mirror, mirror on the wall…: self-perception of facial beauty versus judgment by others. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012;40(8):773–776.
38.
StockNFeragenK. Psychological adjustment to cleft lip and/or palate: a narrative review of the literature. Psychol Health. 2016;31(7):777–813. doi:10.1080/08870446.2016.1143944.
39.
StockNFeragenKRumseyN. “It Doesn’t All Just Stop at 18”: psychological adjustment and support needs of adults born with cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2015;52(5):543–554. doi:10.1597/14-178.
40.
StrickerGCliffordECohenLGiddonDMeskinLEvansC. Psychosocial aspects of craniofacial disfigurement. Am J Orthod. 1979;76(4):410–422. doi:10.1016/0002-9416(79)90226-4.
41.
ThomasPTurnerSRumseyNDowellTSandyJ. Satisfaction with facial appearance among subjects affected by a cleft. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1997;34(3):226–231.
42.
TobiasenJM. Social judgments of facial deformity. Cleft Palate J. 1987;24(4):323–327.
43.
TopolskiTDEdwardsTCPatrickDL. Quality of life: how do adolescents with facial differences compare with other adolescents?Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005;42(1):25–32.
44.
TurnerSThomasPDowellTRumseyNSandyJ. Psychological outcomes amongst cleft patients and their families. Br J Plast Surg. 1997;50(1):1–9. doi:10.1016/s0007-1226(97)91275-3.
45.
WehbyGCassellC. The impact of orofacial clefts on quality of life and healthcare use and costs. Oral Dis. 2010;16(1):3–10. doi:10.1111/j.1601-0825.2009.01588.x.
46.
Wong RiffKTsangarisEGoodacreTForrestCRLawsonJPusicALKlassenAF. What matters to patients with cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017;55(3):442–450. doi:10.1177/1055665617732854.
47.
YazdyMMHoneinMARasmussenSAFriasJL. Priorities for future public health research in orofacial clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007;44(4):351–357.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}