Limited research has studied the involvement of children in medical decision-making. The aim of the study was to understand the involvement of adolescents with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) in decisions about elective surgeries and treatments.
Design:
Parents and professionals completed mixed-methods questionnaires about the degree to which children had been involved in choices about elective treatments. Data were analyzed using content analysis. Young people aged 12 to 25 years were asked to take part in semistructured interviews. The data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.
Setting:
Questionnaire data collection took place online, and interview data were collected via messenger or telephone-based interviews.
Participants:
The study employed 30 participants; 11 young people (3 male, 8 female), 17 parents (13 mothers, 4 fathers), and 5 professionals (2 surgeons, 2 speech and language therapists, and 1 pediatric dentist).
Results:
Five main themes were identified. These reflected participants feeling that with increasing age should come increased involvement in decision-making and that it was important for adolescents to “have a voice” during decision-making. Parents, peers, and health professionals were identified as influencing decisions. Most adolescents reported overall satisfaction with their involvement in decision-making but sometimes felt “left in the dark” by professionals or under pressure from parents. A desire to improve speech and/or appearance was as an area where adolescents wanted to be more involved in decision-making.
Conclusions:
Shared decision-making is an important factor for psychological well-being by promoting autonomy and self-esteem among adolescents with CL/P.
AldersonP. Competent children? Minors’ consent to health care treatment and research. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65(11):2272–2283.
2.
BarryMJEdgman-LevitanS. Shared decision making—the pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(9):780–781.
3.
BeachamBLDeatrickJA. Health care autonomy in children with chronic conditions: implications for self-care and family management. Nurs Clin N Am. 2013;48(2):305–317.
4.
BemmelsHBieseckerBSchmidtJL. Psychological and social factors in undergoing reconstructive surgery among individuals with craniofacial conditions: an exploratory study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2013;50(2):158–167.
5.
BossEFMehtaNNagarajanN. Shared decision making and choice for elective surgical care: a systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;154(3):405–420.
6.
BraunVClarkeV. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
7.
ButnerJBergCAOsbornP. Parent–adolescent discrepancies in adolescents’ competence and the balance of adolescent autonomy and adolescent and parent well-being in the context of type 1 diabetes. Dev Psychol. 2009;45(3):835.
8.
ChuoCBSearleYJeremyA. The continuing multidisciplinary needs of adult patients with cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate-Cran J. 2008;45(6):633–638.
9.
CoyneI. Children’s participation in consultations and decision-making at health service level: a review of the literature. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008;45(11):1682–1689.
10.
CoyneIAmoryAKiernanG. Children’s participation in shared decision-making: children, adolescents, parents and healthcare professionals’ perspectives and experiences. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2014;18(3):273–280.
11.
CoyneIHarderM. Children’s participation in decision-making: balancing protection with shared decision-making using a situational perspective. J Child Health Care. 2011;15(4):312–319.
12.
CoyneIHayesEGallagherP. Giving Children a Voice. Investigation of Children’s Experiences of Participation in Consultation and Decision Making in Irish Hospitals. Dublin, Ireland: Office of the Minister for Children; 2006.
13.
DaskalogiannakisJMehtaM. The need for orthognathic surgery in patients with repaired complete unilateral and complete bilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009;46(5):498–502.
14.
DearnleyC. A reflection on the use of semi-structured interviews. Nurse Res. 2005;13(1):19–28.
15.
Department of Health. Reference Guide to Consent for Examination or Treatment. 2nd ed. London, England: Department of Health; 2009.
16.
EmdeMFuchsM. Using adaptive questionnaire design in open-ended questions: a field experiment. Presented at the meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR); April 2012; San Diego, CA.
17.
FoxFEMorrisMRumseyN. Doing synchronous online focus groups with young people methodological reflections. Qual Health Res. 2007;17(4):539–547.
18.
FuschPINessLR. Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. Qual Rep. 2015;20(9):1408–1416.
19.
GagglASchultesGKärcherH. Aesthetic and functional outcome of surgical and orthodontic correction of bilateral clefts of lip, palate, and alveolus. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1999;36(5):407–412.
20.
GogtayNGieddJNLuskL. Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(21):8174–8179.
21.
HallMJGibsonBJJamesA. Children’s experiences of participant in the cleft lip and palate pathway. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2012;22(6):442–450.
22.
HallMJGibsonBJJamesA. Children’s and adolescents’ perspectives on cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2013;50(2):e18–e26.
23.
HallstromIElanderG. Decision-making during hospitalization: parents’ and children’s involvement. J Clin Nurs. 2004;13(3):367–375.
24.
HeinIMTroostPWBroersmaA. Why is it hard to make progress in assessing children’s decision-making competence?BMC Med Ethics. 2015;16(1):1.
25.
HoustonRCoadJ. Voices of Children and Young People. Involving Children and Young People in the Decision-Making Processes of Healthcare Services. A Review of the Literature. Stockport, England: Action for Sick Children; 2007.
26.
HsiehHFShannonSE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–1288.
27.
HuntOBurdenDHepperP. Self-reports of psychosocial functioning among children and young adults with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006;43(5):598–605.
28.
HuntOBurdenDHepperP. Parent reports of the psychosocial functioning of children with cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007;44(3):304–311.
29.
JacksonCCheaterFMReidI. A systematic review of decision support needs of parents making child health decisions. Health Expect. 2008;11(3):232–251.
30.
Joseph-WilliamsNElwynGEdwardsA. Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;94(3):291–309.
31.
Kapp-SimonKA. A brief overview of psychological issues in cleft lip and palate. In Cleft Lip and Palate. Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer; 2006:257–261.
32.
KellerBKWhistonSC. The role of parental influences on young adolescent’s career development. J Career Assess. 2008;16(2):198–217.
33.
KoernerAFFitzpatrickMA. Communication in intact families. In VangelistiAL (ed.), LEA’s Communication Series. Handbook of Family Communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2004.
34.
KohlbergL. The Psychology of Moral Development: The Nature and Validity of Moral Stages (Essays on Moral development Volume 2). Chicago, IL: Harper & Row; 1986.
35.
KutherTL. Medical decision-making and minors: issues of consent and assent. Adolescence. 2003;38(150):343.
36.
LewisMALewisCE. Consequences of empowering children to care for themselves. Paediatrician. 1990;17(2):63–67.
37.
LipsteinEABrinkmanWBBrittoMT. What is known about parents’ treatment decisions? A narrative review of pediatric decision making. Med Decis Making. 2012;32(2):246–258.
38.
NelsonPACaressALGlennyAM. ‘Doing the “right” thing’: how parents experience and manage decision-making for children’s ‘normalising’ surgeries. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(5):796–804.
39.
NormanAPerssonMStockN. The effectiveness of psychosocial intervention for individuals with cleft lip and/or palate and their parents: a systematic review. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014;52(3):301–310.
40.
PinquartM. Do the parent–child relationship and parenting behaviors differ between families with a child with and without chronic illness? A meta-analysis. J Pediatr Psychol. 2013;38(7):708–721.
41.
RumseyNStockNM. Living with a cleft: psychological challenges, support and intervention. In Cleft Lip and Palate. Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer; 2013:907–915.
42.
SandyJRWilliamsAMildinhallS. The Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) cleft lip and palate study. Br J Orthod. 1998;25(1):21–30.
43.
SchalkersIParsonsCSBundersJF. Health professionals’ perspectives on children’s and young people’s participation in health care: a qualitative multihospital study. J Clin Nurs. 2016;25(7-8):1035–1044.
44.
Setó-SalviaNStanierP. Genetics of cleft lip and/or cleft palate: association with other common anomalies. Eur J Med Genet. 2014;57(8):381–393.
45.
TatesKMeeuwesenLBensingJ. Joking or decision-making? Affective and instrumental behaviour in doctor-parent-child communication. Psychol Health. 2002;17(3):281–295.
46.
TieffenbergJAWoodEIAlonsoA. A randomized field trial of ACINDES: a child-centered training model for children with chronic illnesses (asthma and epilepsy). J Urban Health. 2000;77(2):280–297.
47.
TiemensKNicholasDForrestCR. Living with difference: experience of adolescent girls with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2013;50(2):27–34.
VakninOZisk-RonyRY. Including children in medical decisions and treatments: perceptions and practices of healthcare providers. Child Care Health Dev. 2010;37(4):533–539.
50.
Van PetegemSBeyersWBrenningK. Exploring the association between secure attachment styles and adolescent autonomy in family decision making: A differentiated approach. J. Youth Adolesc. 2012;42(12). doi:10.1007/s10964-012-9886-0
51.
VassGMohosGBereZ. Secondary correction of nasal deformities in cleft lip and palate patients: surgical technique and outcome evaluation. Head Face Med. 2016;12(1):34.
