BerkowitzS. Why hasn’t cutting and grayson done a longitudinal study to show why nasoalveolar molding should not be used?.Cleft PalateCraniofac J. 2019;56(1):141.
3.
BroderHLFloresRLCloustonSKirschnerREGarfinkleJSSischoLPhillipsC. Surgeon’s and caregivers’ appraisal of primary cleft lip treatment with and without nasoalveolar molding: a prospective multicenter pilot study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(3):938.
4.
ChangCSWallaceCGPaiBCJChiuYTHsiehYJChenIJLiaoYFLiouEJChenPK. Comparison of two nasoalveolar molding techniques in unilateral complete cleft lip patients: a randomized, prospective, single-blind trial to compare nasal outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg.2014;134(2):275–282.
5.
ChenYFLiaoYF. A modified nasoalveolar molding technique for correction of unilateral cleft nose deformity. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43(10):2100–2105.
6.
DecWShetyePRDavidsonEHGraysonBHBrechtLECuttingCBWarrenSM. Presurgical nasoalveolar molding and primary gingivoperiosteoplasty reduce the need for bone grafting in patients with bilateral clefts. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24(1):186–190.
7.
LiaoYFWangYCChenIJPaiCJKoWCWangYC. Comparative outcomes of two nasoalveolar molding techniques for bilateral cleft nose deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(1):103–110.
8.
MonasterioLFordAGutiérrezCTastetsMEGarcíaJ. Comparative study of nasoalveolar molding methods: nasal elevator plus DynaCleft® versus NAM-Grayson in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft PalateCraniofac J. 2013;50(5):548–554.
9.
PatelPARubinMSCloustonSLalezaradehFBrechtLECuttingCBShetyePRWarrenSMGraysonBH. Comparative study of early secondary nasal revisions and costs in patients with clefts treated with and without nasoalveolar molding. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(4):1229–1233.
10.
RubinMEsenlikEFloresRLShetyePRGraysonBH. Midface growth in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated with a nasoalveolar molding protocol. J Craniofac Surg. 2019. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005356.
11.
RubinMSCloustonSAhmedMMLoweMKShetyePRBroderHLWarrenSMGraysonBH. Surgeons’ assessment of presurgical clefts and predicted surgical outcome in patients treated with and without nasoalveolar molding. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(1):71–75.
12.
ShayPLGoldsteinJAPaligaJTWinkJJacksonOALowDBartlettSPTaylorJA. A comparative cost analysis of cleft lip adhesion and nasoalveolar molding before formal cleft lip repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(6):1264–1271.
13.
SischoLChanJWSteinMSmithCVan AalstJBroderHL. Nasoalveolar molding: prevalence of cleft centers offering NAM and who seeks it. Cleft PalateCraniofac J. 2012;49(3):270–275.
14.
SischoLCloustonSAPhillipsCBroderHL. Caregiver responses to early cleft palate care: a mixed method approach. Health Psychology. 2016;35(5):474–482.
