Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective:

The goals of this research are (1) to establish normative nasalance values for bilingual Mandarin–English speakers and compare values to those of previously reported monolingual Mandarin speakers, and (2) to examine whether sex, age, dialect, and language proficiency affect levels of nasalance among Mandarin–English speakers in both English and Mandarin.

Design:

All participants recorded the speech stimuli, constructed to include oral sentences, nasal sentences, oronasal sentences, and vowels /ɑ, i, u/ in Mandarin and English. Nasalance measurements were recorded using the Nasometer II 6450.

Participants and Setting:

A total of 45 (20 males and 25 females) native Mandarin speakers between 20 and 54 years of age from mainland China participated in the study.

Results:

Mean nasalance scores of the Mandarin oral sentence (Mean [M] = 17.64, standard deviation [SD] = 7.33), oronasal sentence (M = 54.62, SD = 7.81), and nasal sentence (M = 68.73, SD = 8.09) are reported. Mean nasalance scores of the English oral sentence (M = 20.02, SD = 7.83), oronasal sentence (M = 58.71, SD = 7.59), and nasal sentence (M = 65.27, SD = 7.45) are reported. A repeated measures analysis of variance showed significant sex difference in nasalance scores for English stimuli (P = .031) and Mandarin stimuli (P = .040). There was no significant effects of age, dialect, and language proficiency on Mandarin or English stimuli.

Conclusions:

This is the first study to report normative values for Mandarin–English speakers using the Nasometer II. Values reported can be used for objective assessment of bilingual speakers.

Keywords

Mandarin Chinese English nasalance nasometer resonance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Awan

Bressmann

Poburka

Roy

Sharp

Watts

. Dialectical effects on nasalance: a multicenter, cross-continental study. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015;58(1):69–77.

Bauer

Benedict

. Modern Cantonese Phonology. Berlin, Germany: Monton de Gruyter; 1997.

Bettens

Wuyts

Jonckheere

Platbrood

Van Lierde

. Influence of gender and age on the Nasality Severity Index 2.0 in Dutch-speaking Flemish children and adults. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2017;42(3):133–140.

Bressmann

. Comparison of nasalance scores obtained with the nasometer, the nasal view, and the oronasal system. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005;42(4):423–433.

Bressmann

Klaiman

Fischbach

. Same noses, different nasalance scores: data from normal subjects and cleft palate speakers for three systems for nasalance analysis. Clin Linguist Phon. 2006;20(2-3):163–170.

Catford

Palmer

Dew

Barry

Cheng

Hsu

. A contrastive study of English and Mandarin Chinese. 1974. Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center, United States Department of Defense.

Corey

Gungor

Liu

Nelson

Fredberg

. Normative standards for nasal cross-sectional areas by race as measured by acoustic rhinometry. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;119(4):389–393.

Dalston

Seaver

. Relative values of various standardized passages in the nasomettric assessment of patients with velopharyngeal impairment. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;29(1):17–21.

De Boer

Bressmann

. Comparison of nasalance scores obtained with the nasometers 6200 and 6450. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014;51(1):90–97.

10.

Doetzer

. Nasometric Assessment of Bilingual Spanish/English Speakers. College Park, MD: University of Maryland; 2008. Dissertation.

11.

El-Kassabi

Hassan

Mesallam

Malki

Farahat

Alfaris

. Standardization of nasalance scores in normal Saudi speakers. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2015;40(2):77–85.

12.

Flege

Eefting

. Cross-language switching in stop consonant perception and production by Dutch speakers of English. Speech Commun. 1987;6(3):185–202.

13.

Flege

Schirru

MacKay

. Interaction between the native and second language phonetic subsystems. Speech Commun. 2003;40(4):467–491.

14.

Fletcher

Frost

. Quantitative and graphic analysis of prosthetic treatment for ‘nasalance’ in speech. J Prosth Dent. 1974;32(3):284–291.

15.

Guo

. Understanding the Chinese Economies. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press; 2012.

16.

Huang

Liao

. The Modern Chinese. Lanzhou, China: Gansu People’s Publishing House; 1983.

17.

KayPentax. Software Instruction Manual for Nasometer II Model 6400. Pine Brook, NJ: Lincoln Park; 2007.

18.

Kim

Cao

Liu

Huang

. Dialectal and gender differences in nasalance for a Mandarin population. Clin Linguist Phon. 2016;30(2):119–130.

19.

Kling

Taub

Jabs

. Oral clefting in China over the last decade: 205,679 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2014;2(10):e236.

20.

Kummer

. Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Anomalies: Effects on Speech and Resonance. 2nd ed. Clifton Park, NJ: Delmar Cengage Learning; 2008.

21.

Kuehn

Moon

. Velopharyngeal closure force and levator veli palatini activation levels in varying phonetic contexts. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998;41(1):51–62.

22.

Lee

Zee

. Standard Chinese (Beijing). J International Phon Assoc. 2003;33:109–112.

23.

Lee

Browne

. Nasalance scores for typical Irish English-speaking adults. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2013;38(4):167–172.

24.

Lee

SAS

Iverson

. Stop consonant productions of Korean–English bilingual children. Biling Lang Cogn. 2012;15(2):275–287.

25.

Leeper

Rochet

MacKay

. Characteristics of nasalance in Canadian speakers of English and French. Paper presented at: the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing; October, 1992; Banff, Canada.

26.

Lewis

Simons

Fennig

. Languages with at least 50 million first-language speakers. Paper presented at: the Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Nineteenth edition; February, 2016; Dallas, TX.

27.

Lim

. Nasalance Scores in Mandarin-speaking Chinese Children [Unpublished undergraduate thesis; in Malay]. Selangor, Malaysia: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia; 2011.

28.

Luo

. The Application of Nasometer on the Analysis of Normal and Cleft Palate Speech [in Chinese]. Beijing, China: School of Stomatology, Beijing Medical University; 1992.

29.

Luyten

D’haeseleer

Hodges

Galiwango

Budolfsen

Vermeersch

Van Lierde

. Normative nasalance data in Ugandan English-speaking children. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2012;64(3):131–136.

30.

Marian

Blumenfeld

Kaushanskaya

. The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007;50(4):940–967.

31.

Mayo

. Normative nasalance values across languages. Echo. 2011;6(1):22–32.

32.

MacKay

Kummer

. Simplified Nasometric Assessment Procedures. Lincoln Park, NJ: Kay Elemetrics; 1994.

33.

Okalidou

Karathanasia

Grigoraki

. Nasalance norms in Greek adults. Clin Linguist Phon. 2011;25(8):671–688.

34.

Park

Baek

Lee

Koh

Kim

Baek

. Nasalance scores for normal Korean-speaking adults and children. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67(2):173–177.

35.

Perry

Kotlarek

Mendez

Holt

Fafulas

Broadwell

. Nasometric comparison between Spanish-English bilingual and English monolingual children. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018;56(3):331–339. doi: 10.1177/1055665618786350

36.

Rochet

Yanmei

. Acoustic measurements of vocalic nasality in Mandarin Chinese. Canad Acoust. 1992;20(3):53–54.

37.

Rochet

Sovis

Mielke

. Characteristics of nasalance in speakers of Western Canadian English and French. J Speech Lang Path Audiol. 1998;22(2):94–103.

38.

Seaver

Dalston

Leeper

Adams

. A study of nasometric values for normal nasal resonance. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1991;34(4):715–721.

39.

Sweeney

Sell

O’Regan

. Nasalance scores for normal-speaking Irish children. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2004;41(2):168–174.

40.

Tsai

Wang

Lee

. Voice low tone to high tone ration, nasalance, and nasality ratings in connected speech of native Mandarin speakers: a pilot study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012;49(4):437–446.

41.

Van Doorn

Purcell

. Nasalance levels in the speech of normal Australian children. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1998;35(4):287–292.

42.

Watterson

Lewis

. Test-retest nasalance score variability in hypernasal speakers. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006;43(4):415–419.

43.

Watterson

Lewis

Brancamp

. Comparison of nasalance scores obtained with the Nasometer 6200 and Nasometer II 6400. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005;42(5):574–579.

44.

Watterson

Lewis

Foley-Homan

. Effect of stimulus length on nasalance scores. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1999;36(3):243–247.

45.

Watterson

Lewis

Ludlow

. The effect of nasal decongestion on nasal patency and nasalance scores in subjects with normal speech. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008;45(6):620–627.

46.

Whitehill

. Nasalance measures in Cantonese-speaking women. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001;38(2):119–125.

47.

Wozny

Kuehn

Oishi

Arthur

. Effect of passage length on nasalance values in normal adults. Paper presented at: the American Speech-Language Hearing AssociationNovember, 1994; New Orleans, LA.

48.

Wurm

Baumann

. Language Atlas of China. Canberra, Australia: Australian Academy of the Humanities; Harlow, England: Longman Group (Far East); 1987.

49.

Xue

Hao

Mayo

. Volumetric measurements of vocal tracts for male speakers from different races. Clin Linguist Phon. 2006;20(9):691–702.

50.

Yeni-Komshian

Flege

Liu

. Pronunciation proficiency in the first and second languages of Korean–English bilinguals. Biling Lang Cogn. 2000;3(2):131–149.

51.

Zajac

Lutz

Mayo

. Microphone sensitivity as a source of variation in nasalance scores. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1996;39(6):1228–1231.

52.

Zajac

Mayo

. Aerodynamic and temporal aspects of velopharyngeal function in normal speakers. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1996;39(6):1199–1207.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.14 MB

Evaluating Nasalance Values Among Bilingual Mandarin–English Speakers

Abstract

Objective:

Design:

Participants and Setting:

Results:

Conclusions:

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material