Academic Achievement Among Children With Nonsyndromic Orofacial Clefts

Abstract

Objective:

Children with orofacial clefts (OFCs) may experience poor reading proficiency, learning disabilities, and academic underachievement. We examined the association between nonsyndromic (NS) OFCs and end-of-grade (EOG) performance in reading and math from third through eighth grade in a sample subgroup.

Participants:

We identified a cohort of 559 children with NS-OFCs and 6822 children without birth defects, classifying cleft type by cleft lip alone, with or without cleft alveolar ridge (CL); cleft lip with cleft palate (CL+P); and cleft palate only (CP).

Main Outcome Measures:

Using logistic regression, we estimated the odds of not meeting grade-level standards among children with NS-OFCs compared to unaffected peers. Using longitudinal analyses, we estimated the odds of not meeting grade-level standards and average change in test scores through eighth grade.

Results:

Children with NS-OFCs were 1.22 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.83) times as likely not to meet grade-level standards in reading compared to unaffected peers. The effect was similar for math (OR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.92, 1.48). Children with CL+P were 1.33 (95% CI: 0.86, 1.83) and 1.74 (95% CI: 1.19, 2.56) times as likely not to meet grade-level standard in reading and in both subjects, respectively, compared to unaffected peers. The average rate of change in both scores was similar for children with and without OFCs.

Conclusions:

Poor academic performance appears greatest for children with CL+P, a finding compatible with previous observations and hypothesized mechanisms associating orofacial clefts with subtle abnormalities in brain development. Academic performance monitoring and referral for academic assistance is warranted.

Keywords

academic achievement nonsyndromic orofacial clefts school performance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adamson

Anderson

Nopoulos

Sean

Da Costa

. Regional brain morphometric characteristics of nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate. Dev Neurosci. 2014;36:490–8.

Aerts

DeVolder

Weinberg

. Haploinsufficiency of interferon regulatory factor 6 alters brain morphology in the mouse. Am J Med Genet A. 2014;164:655–660.

Aylsworth

Allori

Pimenta

. Issues involved in the phenotypic classification of orofacial clefts ascertained through a state birth defects registry for the North Carolina Cleft Outcomes Study. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2015;103:899–903.

Berg

Haaland

Feragen

. Health status among adults born with an oral cleft in Norway. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170:1063–1070.

Brand

Blechschmidt

Muller

. Psychosocial functioning and sleep patterns in children and adolescents with cleft lip and palate (CLP) compared with healthy controls. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009;46:124–135.

Broder

Richman

Matheson

. Learning disability, school achievement, and grade retention among children with cleft: a two-center study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1998;35:127–131.

Demyer

Zeman

Palmer

. The face predicts the brain: diagnostic significance of median facial anomalies for holoprosencephaly (Arhinencephaly). Pediatrics. 1964;34:256–63.

Estes

Morris

. Relationships among intelligence, speech proficiency, and hearing sensitivity in children with cleft palates. Cleft Palate J. 1970;7:763–773.

Glatz

Sandin

Pedersen

Bonamy

Eriksson

Granath

. Association of anesthesia and surgery during childhood with long-term academic performance. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171:e163470.

10.

Hentges

Hill

Bishop

Goodacre

Moss

Murray

. The effect of cleft lip on cognitive development in school-aged children: a paradigm for examining sensitive period effects. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2011;52:704–712.

11.

Heyne

Melberg

Doroodchi

. Definition of critical periods for Hedgehog pathway antagonist-induced holoprosencephaly, cleft lip, and cleft palate. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0120517.

12.

Jocelyn

Penko

Rode

. Cognition, communication, and hearing in young children with cleft lip and palate and in control children: a longitudinal study. Pediatrics. 1996;97:529–534.

13.

Knight

Cassell

Meyer

Strauss

. Academic outcomes of children with isolated orofacial clefts compared with children without a major birth defect. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2015;52:259–268.

14.

Lipinski

Holloway

O’Leary-Moore

. Characterization of subtle brain abnormalities in a mouse model of Hedgehog pathway antagonist-induced cleft lip and palate. PLoS One. 2014;9:e102603.

15.

Mai

Cassell

Meyer

.; National Birth Defects Prevention Network. Birth defects data from population-based birth defects surveillance programs in the United States, 2007 to 2011: highlighting orofacial clefts. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2014;100:895–904.

16.

Marcucio

Cordero

Helms

. Molecular interactions coordinating the development of the forebrain and face. Dev Biol. 2005;284:48–61.

17.

Marcucio

Young

Hallgrimsson

. Mechanisms that underlie co-variation of the brain and face. Genesis. 2011;49:177–189.

18.

Miles

Stipek

. Contemporaneous and longitudinal associations between social behavior and literacy achievement in a sample of low-income elementary school children. Child Dev. 2006;77:103–117.

19.

Neiman

Savage

. Development of infants and toddlers with clefts from birth to three years of age. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1997;34:218–225.

20.

Nopoulos

Langbehn

Canady

Magnotta

Richman

. Abnormal brain structure in children with isolated clefts of the lip or palate. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161:753–758.

21.

North Carolina Reading Comprehension Tests technical report, grade 3 reading comprehension pretest, end-of-grade reading comprehension tests. 4 21, 2009. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Department of Public Instruction.

22.

Persson

Becker

Svensson

. Academic achievement in individuals with cleft: a population-based register study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012;49:153–159.

23.

Peisner-Feinberg

LaForett

Schaaf

Hildebrandt

Sideris

, Pan Y. Children’s outcomes and program quality in the North Carolina Pre-Kindergarten Program: 2012–2013 Statewide Evaluation. 2014.

24.

Public Schools of North Carolina. 2003; Accountability brief. State Board of Education, North Carolina Department of Public Instruction.

25.

Richieri-Costa

Ribeiro

. Holoprosencephaly and holoprosencephaly-like phenotypes: review of facial and molecular findings in patients from a craniofacial hospital in Brazil. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2010;154C:149–157.

26.

Richman

. Cognitive patterns and learning disabilities of cleft palate children with verbal deficits. J Speech Hear Res. 1980;23:447–456.

27.

Richman

Wilgenbusch

Hall

. Spontaneous verbal labeling: visual memory and reading ability in children with cleft. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005;42:565–569.

28.

Robert

Burchinal

Medley

. Otitis media, hearing sensitivity, and maternal responsiveness in relation to language during infancy. J Pediatr. 1995;126:481–489.

29.

Snyder

Pope

A. W

. Psychosocial adjustment in children and adolescents with a craniofacial anomaly: diagnosis-specific patterns. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2010;47:264–272.

30.

Sperber

. First year of life: prenatal craniofacial development. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;29:109–11.

31.

Start Early, Finish Strong: How to Help Every Child Become a Reader. US Department of Education, America Reads Challenge, 7 1999. http://www2.ed.gov/pubs/startearly/index.html.

32.

Voyer

. Gender differences in scholastic achievement: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2014;140:1174–1204.

33.

Wehby

Collet

Barron

Romitti

Ansley

Speltz

. Academic achievement of children and adolescents with oral clefts. Pediatrics. 2014;133:785–792.

34.

Wehby

Collett

Barron

Romitti

Ansley

. Children with oral clefts are at greater risk for persistent low achievement in school than classmates. Arch Dis Child. 2015;100:1148–1154.

35.

Weinberg

Andreasen

Nopoulos

. Three-dimensional morphometric analysis of brain shape in nonsyndromic orofacial clefting. J Anat. 2009;214:926–936.

36.

Williams

Dunlop

Kramer

Dever

Hogue

Jain

. Perinatal origins of first-grade academic failure: role of prematurity and maternal factors. Pediatrics. 2013;131:693–700.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.04 MB