Despite of increasing the number of students with disabilities in higher education of Bangladesh, their needs and experiences on using digital technology are yet to be explored.
Purpose
This qualitative study aims to understand the access and engagement of students with disabilities in digital technology at university and also it aims to explore their purpose and context of using digital technology.
Methodology
Multiple case study design was adopted for this study where 10 students with disabilities of a public university were selected purposively as research participants. Semi-structured interview and focus group discussion were employed to gather the data.
Findings
Findings indicated that students with disability use various digital devices such as android smartphone, laptop, and so on for their academic and non-academic purposes. Moreover, several software, apps, and other online services were identified as useful tools in participating at university activities. Also, it indicated that the students were engaged in extensive but largely mundane uses of technology, a bit similar to their non-disabled peers.
Conclusion
The study showcased students’ perception on using digital technology in diverse area of attitudes. The study will guide the university disability support service and policy makers in offering more effective digital technologies and adapting the learning experiences accordingly.
KazleyASAnnanDLCarsonNE, et al.Understanding the use of educational technology among faculty, staff, and students at a medical university. TechTrends2013; 57(2): 63–70.
2.
MadausJW. Navigating the college transition maze: a guide for students with learning disabilities. Teach Except Child2005; 37(3): 32–37.
3.
GrimesSScevakJSouthgateE, et al.Non-disclosing students with disabilities or learning challenges: characteristics and size of a hidden population. Aust Educ Res2017; 44(4-5): 425–441.
4.
GetzelEE. Addressing the persistence and retention of students with disabilities in higher education: incorporating key strategies and supports on campus. Exceptionality2008; 16(4): 207–219.
5.
TinklinTRiddellSWilsonA. Disabled students in higher education. Centre for Educational Sociology, 2004.
6.
MeliánEMenesesJ. Getting ahead in the online university: disclosure experiences of students with apparent and hidden disabilities. Int J Educ Res2022; 114: 101991.
7.
Fernández-BataneroJMMontenegro-RuedaMFernández-CereroJ. Access and participation of students with disabilities: the challenge for higher education. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19(19): 11918.
8.
DraffanERaingerbP. A model for the identification of challenges to blended learning. Approaches to Developing Accessible Learning Experiences. Conceptualising Best Practice. Routledge, 2013, 55.
9.
SealeJ. E-learning and disability in higher education: accessibility research and practice. 2nd ed.Routledge, 2013.
10.
SealeJColwellCCoughlanT, et al.‘Dreaming in colour’: disabled higher education students’ perspectives on improving design practices that would enable them to benefit from their use of technologies. Educ Inf Technol2021; 26: 1687–1719.
11.
SharpeRBenfieldGRobertsG, et al.The undergraduate experience of blended e-learning: a review of UK literature and practice. The Higher Education Academy. 2006; 1–103.
12.
GetzelEMcManusSBrielL. Expanding support services on campus. In: GetzelEEWehmanP (eds). Going to college: Expanding opportunities for people with disabilities. Paul H. Brookes, 2005, pp. 139–154.
13.
RizkJHillierC. Digital technology and increasing engagement among students with disabilities: interaction rituals and digital capital. Computers and Education Open2022; 3(3): 100099.
HaiderMS. “Technology earns us respect from your able-world”: disabled students’ perceived outcome of digital technology use in higher education. Teacher’s World: J Educ Res2023; 48(2): 102–111.
16.
AhmedMHUHoqueMR. Identifying and addressing the challenges faced by students with visual impairments in accessing education and learning contents in Relation to ICT: the case of the tertiary education in Bangladesh. Int J Educ Knowl Manag (IJEKM). 2020; 3(1): 1–12.
17.
HaiderMS. Provision or limitation? Digital technology experiences of students with disabilities at the University of Dhaka. Teacher’s World: J Educ Res2022; 48(1): 83–94.
18.
MamunHARRahmanMMAl-AminM, et al.Complications faced by disabled students at higher education institutions in Bangladesh: observations from nondisabled students. Open J Soc Sci2024; 12: 413–439.
19.
AlamMAKabirI. Challenges and adaptation strategies of students with disabilities in higher education in Bangladesh. J Educ Mngt and Dev Studies2023; 3(3): 27–40.
20.
RahamanMMDasAZamanRA. Accessibility and inclusion of students with disabilities in University of Dhaka: transforming the University in line with sustainable development goals. Teacher’s World: J Educ Res2023; 49(1): 205–225.
21.
ShakespeareT. The social model of disability. In: DavisLJ (ed). The disability studies reader. Routledge, 2010, pp. 266–273.
22.
HunzikerSBlankenagelM. Multiple case research design. Research Design in Business and Management, 2021. Springer Gabler.
23.
BrymanA. Social research methods. 4th ed. : Oxford University Press, 2012.
24.
BraunVClarkeV. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol2006; 3(2): 77–101.
25.
World Medical Association. World Medical Association declaration of helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA2013; 310(20): 2191–2194.
26.
European Union. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation). Off J Eur Union2016; 119: 1–88.
27.
MorosanuLHandleyKO’DonovanB. Seeking support: researching first‐year students’ experiences of coping with academic life. High Educ Res Dev2010; 29(6): 665–678.
28.
LairioMPuukariSKouvoA. Studying at university as part of student life and identity construction. Scand J Educ Res2013; 57(2): 115–131.
29.
AshforthBEHarrisonSHCorleyKG. Identification in organizations: an examination of four fundamental questions. J Manag2008; 34(3): 325–374.
30.
BliucAMEllisRAGoodyearP, et al.The role of social identification as a university student in learning: relationships between students’ social identity, approaches to learning, and academic achievement. Educ Psychol2011; 31(5): 559–574.
31.
KeaneE. Distancing to self‐protect: the perpetuation of inequality in higher education through socio‐relational dis/engagement. Br J Sociol Educ2011; 32(3): 449–466.
32.
BourdieuP. The forms of capital. In: RichardsonJ (ed). Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. Greenwood Press, 1986, pp. 241–258.
33.
PintoMLeiteC. Digital technologies in support of students learning in higher Education: literature review. Digit Educ Rev2020; 37(37): 343–360.
