Although often classified as a motor skill, standing balance relies on three sensory systems: vestibular, proprioception, and visual. To assess balance by challenging these systems, the rater uses the Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration and Balance (mCTSIB). However, valid low-cost equipment is unavailable for continuous patient monitoring.
Objective
The aim of the present study was to assess the validity of the Wii balance board (WBB) compared to a standard force platform during the mCTSIB.
Methods
A sample of 50 participants (17 men and 33 women; 23.34 [3.10] y; 1.68 [0.08] m; 68.82 [13.55] kg) was included. The average total COP displacement was simultaneously collected during standing balance from both WBB and the force platform under four conditions: eyes opened and closed with and without a foam cushion.
Results
No significant differences were observed between the WBB and the force platform. The correlation was considered high (r > .98; p = .001), with excellent adjusted coefficients of determination (.97 < r2 < .99). The Bland–Altman method revealed low bias, and the majority of the results were scattered between the lower and upper levels of agreement.
Conclusions
The present findings suggest the validity of the WBB to assess the balance during the mCTSIB.
CohenHSSangi-HaghpeykarH. Differences in responses on the modified clinical test of sensory interaction and balance on medium firm and medium density foam in healthy controls and patients with vestibular disorders. Biomed Hub2020; 5: 1–8.
2.
CohenHSMulavaraAPPetersBT, et al.Standing balance tests for screening people with vestibular impairments. Laryngoscope2014; 124: 545–550.
3.
CohenHSMulavaraAPStitzJ, et al.Screening for vestibular disorders using the modified clinical test of sensory interaction and balance and tandem walking with eyes closed. Otol Neurotol2019; 40: 658–665.
4.
AntoniadouEKaliviotiXStolakisK, et al.Reliability and validity of the mCTSIB dynamic platform test to assess balance in a population of older women living in the community. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact2020; 20: 185–193.
5.
MulavaraAPCohenHSPetersBT, et al.New analyses of the sensory organization test compared to the clinical test of sensory integration and balance in patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Laryngoscope2013; 123: 2276–2280.
6.
GobleDJBrarHBrownEC, et al.Normative data for the balance tracking system modified clinical test of sensory integration and balance protocol. Med Devices2019; 12: 183–191.
7.
CiminoVChisariCGRacitiG, et al.Static postural control disturbances among the different multiple sclerosis phenotypes: a neurocom balance manager® evaluation study. Mult Scler Relat Disord2018; 26: 46–51.
8.
WagatsumaMKimTSitagataP, et al.The biomechanical investigation of the relationship between balance and muscular strength in people with chronic stroke: a pilot cross-sectional study. Top Stroke Rehabil2019; 26: 173–179.
9.
KalkanACKahramanTUgutBO, et al.Clinical and laboratory measures of balance and comparison of balance performances according to postural instability and gait disorders in individuals with Parkinson’s disease. Somatosens Mot Res2021; 38: 34–40.
10.
GleesonMBorightLHaworthJ. The effects of chemotherapy-induced polyneuropathy on postural balance. Cureus2021; 13: e16617.
11.
AliasHAJustineM. The impact of a submaximal level of exercise on balance performance in older persons. Sci World J2014; 2014: 1–6.
12.
BalciBAkdalG. Outcome of vestibular rehabilitation in vestibular migraine. J Neurol2022; 269: 6246–6253.
13.
GobleDJConnerNONolffMR, et al.Test–retest reliability of the balance tracking system modified clinical test of sensory integration and balance protocol across multiple time durations. Med Devices2021; 14: 355–361.
14.
FreemanLGeraGHorakFB, et al.Instrumented test of sensory integration for balance: a validation study. J Geriatr Phys Ther2018; 41: 77–84.
15.
GobleDJBrownECMarksCRC, et al.Expanded normative data for the balance tracking system modified clinical test of sensory integration and balance protocol. Med Devices Sens2020; 3: e10084.
16.
HasanMRahmanM. Development of a low cost system for lifting related injury analysis. In: 2021 13th International Conference on Computer and Automation Engineering (ICCAE). IEEE, 2021, pp. 128–132.
17.
MacedoMde CSouzaMABatistaGde L, et al.Test–retest of a novel Wii board–based device to assess eccentric knee flexor strength during the Nordic hamstring exercise. J Sport Rehabil2022; 1: 1–6.
18.
ClarkRABryantALPuaY, et al.Validity and reliability of the Nintendo Wii balance board for assessment of standing balance. Gait Posture2010; 31: 307–310.
19.
ClarkRAMentiplayBFPuaY-H, et al.Reliability and validity of the Wii balance board for assessment of standing balance: a systematic review. Gait Posture2018; 61: 40–54.
20.
EshojHJuul-KristensenBJørgensenRGB, et al.Reproducibility and validity of the Nintendo Wii balance board for measuring shoulder sensorimotor control in prone lying. Gait Posture2017; 52: 211–216.
21.
PuaYHClarkRAOngPH. Evaluation of the Wii balance board for walking aids prediction: proof-of-concept study in total knee arthroplasty. PLoS One2015; 10: 1–11.
22.
KeunePMYoungWRParaskevopoulosIT, et al.Measuring standing balance in multiple sclerosis: further progress towards an automatic and reliable method in clinical practice. J Neurol Sci2017; 379: 157–162.
23.
ParkDSLeeG. Validity and reliability of balance assessment software using the Nintendo Wii balance board: usability and validation. J NeuroEng Rehabil2014; 11: 1–8.
24.
MengarelliACardarelliSStrazzaA, et al.Validity of the Nintendo Wii balance board for the assessment of balance measures in the functional reach test. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2018; 26: 1400–1406.
25.
HattonALKempJLBrauerSG, et al.Impairment of dynamic single-leg balance performance in individuals with hip chondropathy. Arthritis Care Res2014; 66: 709–716.
26.
KwokBCClarkRAPuaYH. Novel use of the Wii balance board to prospectively predict falls in community-dwelling older adults. Clin Biomech2015; 30: 481–484.
27.
WikstromEA. Validity and reliability of Nintendo Wii fit balance scores. J Athl Train2012; 47: 306–313.
28.
Merchant-BornaKJonesCMCJanigroM, et al.Evaluation of Nintendo Wii balance board as a tool for measuring postural stability after sport-related concussion. J Athl Train2017; 52: 245–255.
29.
EguchiRTakahashiM. Validity of the Nintendo Wii balance board for kinetic gait analysis. Appl Sci2018; 8: 285.
30.
ClarkRAPuaY-H. SeeSway – a free web-based system for analysing and exploring standing balance data. Comput Methods Progr Biomed2018; 159: 31–36.
31.
Scaglioni-SolanoPAragón-VargasLF. Validity and reliability of the Nintendo Wii balance board to assess standing balance and sensory integration in highly functional older adults. Int J Rehabil Res2014; 37: 138–143.
32.
O’ConnorSMBawejaHSGobleDJ. Validating the BTrackS balance plate as a low cost alternative for the measurement of sway-induced center of pressure. J Biomech2016; 49: 4142–4145.
33.
GobleDJBawejaNBawejaHS. BTrackS: a low-cost, portable force plate for objectively measuring balance deficits and fall risk. Home Healthc Nurse2019; 37: 355–356.
34.
HewstonPDeshpandeN. Falls and balance impairments in older adults with type 2 diabetes: thinking beyond diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Can J Diabetes2016; 40: 6–9.
35.
FilhoJEBorelWPMata DizJB, et al.Prevalence of falls and associated factors in community-dwelling older Brazilians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cad Saude Publica2019; 35: 1–16.
36.
ChangVCDoMT. Risk factors for falls among seniors: implications of gender. Am J Epidemiol2015; 181: 521–531.
37.
HubbardBPothierDHughesC, et al.A portable, low-cost system for posturography: a platform for longitudinal balance telemetry. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2012; 41(Suppl 1): S31–S35.
38.
BoughenJDunnKNitzJ, et al.A new method of interpreting the centre of gravity location using the modified clinical test of sensory interaction on balance: a reliability study. Hong Kong Physiother J2013; 31: 64–68.
39.
KimMKimSWonCW. Test-retest reliability and sensitivity to change of a new fall risk assessment system: a pilot study. Ann Geriatr Med Res2018; 22: 80–87.
40.
AntoniadouEKaliviotiXStolakisK, et al.Reliability and validity of the mCTSIB dynamic platform test to assess balance in a population of older women living in the community. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact2020; 20: 185–193.
