Despite the fact that in the modern education that is characterized by technology evolution, Assistive technology usage remains below optimal levels hence jeopardizing the catching up with curriculum for pupils with disabilities. Assistive Technology Devices (ATDs) stand as a beacon of inclusivity, designed to bridge the gap between pupils with disabilities and their peers with no disabilities.
Purpose
This study explores teachers’ perspectives on the challenges associated to ATDs utilization. It investigates the barriers that hinder effective integration of ATDs in the teaching and learning processes.
Major Findings
The findings indicate that the inadequate availability and functionality of Assistive Technology Devices significantly affect equal participation of pupils with disabilities in academic issues. Other notable challenges include shortage of specialized trained teachers, lack of trainings that hinder teachers’ ability to integrate ATDs into classroom practices, shortage of resource teachers, overcrowded classrooms, insufficient technical support and device maintenance services, discomfort with using ATDs due to inadequate professional development, and curriculum instability.
Conclusion
The study underscores that inadequate ATD access and lack of trained teachers hinder inclusive education. Also, substantial gap persists between policy intent and classroom realities. Therefore, the study recommends for urgent need for collaborative initiatives among policy makers and education stakeholders to address both pedagogical and technological barriers, improve accessibility, and ultimately enhance learning outcomes for students with disabilities.
EligiIMwantimwaK. ICT accessibility and usability to support learning of visually-impaired students in Tanzania. Int J Educ Dev using Inf Commun Technol (IJEDICT)2017; 13(2): 87–102.
2.
TonyMP. The effectiveness of assistive technology to support children with SLD: teacher perspectives. Jonkoping University, 2019.
3.
SenjamSSFosterABascaranC, et al.Assistive technology for students with visual disability in schools for the blind in Delhi. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol2020; 15(6): 663–669.
4.
AlnahdiG. Assistive technology in special education and the universal design for learning. Turkish Online J Educ Technol2014; 13(2): 18–23.
5.
World Health Organization. Priority assistive products list. The GATE initiative, 2016.
6.
EdyburnDL. Supporting diverse learners: from assistive technology to universal design for learning. Todays Cathol Teach2015.
7.
FitzgeraldGKouryKMitchemK. Research on computer-mediated instruction for students with high incidence disabilities. J Educ Comput Res2008; 38(2): 201–233.
8.
MwantimwaK. Exploring usage of assistive technology resources by students with disabilities. J Disabil Stud2021; 7(1): 38–47.
9.
ShoaibMFitzpatrickDPittI. Assistive technology-based solutions in learning mathematics for visually-impaired people: exploring issues, challenges and opportunities. Multimed Tools Appl2023; 82(29): 46153–46184.
10.
da SilvaAPBulle OliveiraASPinheiro BezerraIM, et al.Low cost assistive technology to support educational activities for adolescents with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol2018; 13(7): 676–682.
11.
LodhiKAgraDSinghA. Assistive technology: tools for teaching children with special needs. Int J Res all Subj Multi Lang2024; 12(1): 19–28.
12.
Al-HendawiMHusseinEAl GhafriB, et al.A scoping review of studies on assistive technology interventions and their impact on individuals with autism spectrum disorder in Arab countries. Children2023; 10(11): 1828.
13.
Hina BatoolSAmeenK. Status of technological competencies: a case study of university librarians. Libr Philos Pract2010.
14.
KirboyunS. High-tech or tow-tech? impact of assistive technology in school settings for students with visual impairments: review of research. Int J Infonomics2020; 13(1): 1945–1953.
15.
AkpanJPBeardA. Overview of assistive technology possibilities for teachers to enhance academic outcomes of all students. Univers J Educ Res2013; 1(2): 113–118.
16.
ILO. No one left behind, not now , not ever Persons with disabilities in the COVID-19 response. International Labour Organization, 2020.
17.
IsailaN. The assistive software, useful and necessary tool for blind student’s abilities development. Proced Soc Behav Sci2013; 116: 2189–2192.
18.
AmbikaVSheeja VayolaV. Promoting inclusive education for sustainable development: a comprehensive research perspective. Shanlax Int J Arts, Sci Humanit2023; 11(S1i2-Nov): 116–119.
19.
Fernández-BataneroJMMontenegro-RuedaMFernández-CereroJ, et al.Assistive technology for the inclusion of students with disabilities: a systematic review. Educ Technol Res Dev2022; 70(5): 1911–1930.
20.
MetatlaOSerranoMJouffraisC, et al.Inclusive education technologies: emerging opportunities for people with visual impairments. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, Montréal, QC, Canada, 21–26 April 2018, pp. w13.1–w13.8.
21.
WinterEO’RawP. Literature review on the principles and practices relating to inclusive education for children with special needs education. PLoS Curr2010; 1(3): 9–16.
22.
MwaijandeVT. Access to education and assistive devices for children with physical disabilities in Tanzania. Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, 2014.
23.
ErdemR. Students with special educational needs and assistive technologies: a literature review. Turkish Online J Educ Technol2017; 16(1): 128–146.
24.
EileenO.Disciplinary exclusion of students with disabilities. Natl Cent Poverty Law2000; 34(1–2): 50.
25.
MerblerJBHadadianAJeanJ. Using assistive technology in the inclusive classroom. Prev Sch Fail2010; 3(3): 113–117.
26.
AhmedA. Perceptions of using assistive technology for students with disabilities in the classroom. Int J Spec Educ2018; 33(1): 129–139.
27.
MushiPA. History and development of education in Tanzania. Dar es Salaam University Press, 2009.
28.
KombaSCMwakabengaRJ. Teacher professional development in Tanzania: perceptions and practices. J Int Coop Educ2008; 11: 67–83.
29.
TungarazaFD. The arduous march toward inclusive education in Tanzania: head teachers’ and teachers’ perspectives. Afr Today2014; 61(2): 109–123.
30.
TungarazaFD. The development and history of special education in Tanzania. Int J Disabil Dev Educ1994.
MorganDL. Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. J Mix Methods Res2007; 1(1): 48–76.
33.
CreswellJW. Research design: qualitative quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications, 2003.
34.
GrönlundÅLimNLarssonH. Effective use of assistive technologies for inclusive education in developing countries: issues and challenges from two case studies. Int J Educ Dev using Inf Commun Technol (IJEDICT)2010; 6(4): 5–26.
35.
AlsolamiAS. Teachers of special education and assistive technology: teachers’perceptions of knowledge, competencies and professional development. Sage Open2022; 12(1): 1–12.
36.
CreswellJWClarkVLP. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications, 2018.
37.
MorganDLMorganDLMorganDL. Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. J Mix Methods Res2007; 1(1): 48–76.
38.
CreswellJWCreswellJD. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 5th ed.Sage Publications, 2018.
39.
McNichollACaseyHDesmondD, et al.The impact of assistive technology use for students with disabilities in higher education: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol2021; 16(2): 130–143.
40.
OluguFF. Availability and utilization of assistive technology devices for improved teaching and learning among students with learning disabilities in Ohafia, Abia State. SSRN2020.
41.
TraffordZvan der WesthuizenEMcDonaldS, et al.More than just assistive devices: how a south african social enterprise supports an environment of inclusion. Int J Environ Res Publ Health2021; 18(5): 1–15.
42.
AultMJBauschMEMclarenEM. Assistive technology service delivery in rural school districts. Rural Spec Educ Q2013; 32(2): 15–22.
43.
AmweRDommakF. Effects of assistive technology on the academic performance of pupils with disabilities in inclusive schools in Jos, Plateau State. Int J Acad Res Educ Rev2021; 9(5): 260–266.
44.
LazarusMMutieNMbitheJ. Management of learners with special needs in inclusive education in Makueni county , Kenya, 2019, vol 3, pp. 30–41.
45.
KisangaDHKisangaSE. Access to assistive technology among students with visual impairment in higher education institutions in Tanzania. Univ Dar es Salaam Libr J2020; 15(2): 137–151.
46.
EbuenyiIDSmithEMJamaliMZ, et al.The ideal process for developing assistive technology policy. Assist Technol2024; 36(3): 224–231.
47.
MavrouK. The use of assistive technology in education: a guide for teachers and schools. UNICEF, 2022, pp. 1–112.
48.
VinerMSinghAShaughnessyMF. Assistive technology to help students with disabilities. Special education design and development tools for school rehabilitation professionals. IGI Global, 2020, pp. 240–267.
49.
TalafhaAH. Factors influencing academic performance andachievement of students with disabilities. Int J Soc Sci Hum Res2022; 05(03): 911–926.
50.
HofmanRHKilimoJS. Teachers’ attitudes and self-efficacy towards inclusion of pupils with disabilities in Tanzanian schools. J Educ Train2014; 1(2): 177.
51.
TungarazaFD. Training teachers in special needs education in Tanzania: a long and challenging ordeal to inclusion. Huria J Open Univ Tanzania2014; 16: 49–60.
52.
CampadoRJToqueroCMDUlandayDM. Integration of assistive technology in teaching learners with special educational needs and disabilities in the Philippines. Int J Prof Dev Learn Learn2023; 5(1): ep2308.
AdebisiROLimanNALongpoePK. Using assistive technology in teaching children with learning disabilities in the 21st Century. J Educ Pract2015; 6(24): 14–20.
56.
Abu-AlghaythK. Teachers’ use of assistive technology in Saudi special education schools: a mixed-methods enquiry. Int J Dev Disabil2022; 68(4): 547–557.
57.
MokalengMMöwesAD. Issues affecting the implementation of inclusive education practices in selected secondary schools in the Omaheke region of Namibia. J Curric Teach2020; 9(2): 78.
58.
MtemiEP. Teaching models used and challenges experienced in secondary school classes with special needs learners in Tanzania. East African J Educ Soc Sci2022; 3(6): 129–137.
59.
VincentDAOkeowoROAriyoS. The use of assistive technology for students with disabilities in technical colleges in Ondo State. J Educ Res Pract2024; 14(1): 52–67.
60.
CaldwellT. Tech for understanding: an introduction to assistive and instructional technology in the classroom. J Undergrad Res2019; 6(1): 5.
61.
SenjamSSFosterABascaranC. Barriers to using assistive technology among students with visual disability in schools for the blind in Delhi, India. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol2021; 16(7): 802–806.
62.
SenjamSSFosterABascaranC. Assistive technology for visual impairment and trainers at schools for the blind in Delhi. Assist Technol2022; 34(4): 418–422.
63.
BavlıBKorumazMAkarE. Visually impaired mentally sighted: an inclusive education case. Int J Prog Educ2020; 16(6): 1–14.
64.
KisangaSEKisangaDH. The role of assistive technology devices in fostering the participation and learning of students with visual impairment in higher education institutions in Tanzania. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol2022; 17(7): 791–800.
65.
KhamisG. Teachers’ beliefs and practices observed in inclusive classes. Electron J Incl Educ2011; 2(8).
66.
LaRaeJD. Assistive technology for students with disabilities Resources. University of Northern Iowa, 2012.
67.
LynchPSingalNFrancisGA. Educational technology for learners with disabilities in primary school settings in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic literature review. Educ Rev2024; 76(2): 405–431.
68.
WilfredJ. Influence of assistive technology utilization on academic performance of þÿpupils with disabilities in Tanzania s primary school. The University of Dodoma, 2017.
69.
AldehamiS. Assistive technology in special education students and its impact on engagement into education. Inf Sci Lett2022; 11(6): 2325–2331.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
