Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online 2026-2
The use of the social robot NAO to enhance communication skills in children with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review of studies from 2013–2019 to 2020–2025
Although numerous studies have examined the field of Socially Assistive Robots (SARs), less attention has been paid to evaluating the role of the NAO robot in enhancing the communication skills of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) across two distinct time periods (2013–2019 and 2020–2025), highlighting advancements in both SAR-based interventions and NAO’s technological capabilities. A systematic search was conducted across international databases, using strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, resulting in the selection of 44 relevant studies. This review synthesizes findings on the types of interventions implemented, NAO’s functional characteristics, and its effectiveness in facilitating social communication. The results indicate a positive impact on children’s communication abilities, with more recent studies (2020–2025) reporting greater improvements, possibly due to advancements in NAO’s capabilities and the refinement of intervention methodologies. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review to compare NAO-assisted interventions across two different periods, offering novel insights into the evolving role of SARs in autism therapy.
AlamAMohantyA. Integrated constructive robotics in education (ICRE) model: a paradigmatic framework for transformative learning in educational ecosystem. Cogent Educ2024; 11(1): 123–136.
2.
BelancheDCasalóLVFlaviánC, et al.Service robot implementation: a theoretical framework and research agenda. Serv Ind J2019; 40(3): 203–225.
3.
OnnaschLRoeslerEA. Taxonomy to structure and analyze human–robot interaction. Int J Soc Robot2021; 13(3): 833–849.
4.
RoshidulHShariffARBMBlackmoreBS, et al.High adoption of behavior based robotics in the autonomous machines. J Inf Syst Technol2010; 3(6): 30–41.
5.
KurtzGKohen-Vacs. Humanoid robot as a tutor in a team-based training activity. Interact Learn Environ2022; 32(1): 340–354.
6.
Chita-TegmarkMScheutzM. Assistive robots for the social management of Health: a framework for robot design and human–robot interaction research. Int J Soc Robot2021; 13(3): 197–217.
7.
ChiuMCHwangGJTuYF. Roles, applications, and research designs of robots in science education: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis of journal publications from 1996 to 2020. Interact Learn Environ2022; 32(5): 1834–1859.
8.
JungSEWonES. Systematic review of research trends in robotics education for young children. Sustainability2018; 10(4): 84–115.
9.
KofinasNOrfanoudakisELagoudakisMG. Complete analytical forward and inverse kinematics for the NAO Humanoid Robot. J Intell Robot Syst2015; 77(2): 251–264.
10.
VaidisMOtisMJD. Toward a robot swarm protecting a group of migrants. Intell Serv Robot2020; 13(3): 299–314.
11.
Cruz-RamírezSRGarcía-MartínezMOlais-GoveaJM. NAO robots as context to teach numerical methods. Int J Interact Des Manuf2022; 16(3): 1337–1356.
12.
TahirYDauwelsJThalmannD, et al.A user study of a humanoid robot as a social mediator for two-person conversations. Int J Soc Robot2020; 12(2): 1031–1044.
13.
Díaz-BoladerasMClaveri DíazAGarcía-SánchezM. Robots for inclusive classrooms: a scoping review. Universal Access Inf Soc2023; 23(2): 23–37.
14.
AhmadMIMubinOOrlandoJ. Adaptive social robot for sustaining social engagement during long-term children–robot interaction. Int J Hum Comput Interact2017; 33(12): 943–962.
15.
Syriopoulou-DelliCKGkiolntaE. Review of assistive technology in the training of children with autism spectrum disorders. Int J Dev Disabil2020; 68(2): 73–85.
16.
Georgieva-TsanevaGAndreevaATsvetkovaP, et al.Exploring the potential of social robots for speech and language therapy: a review and analysis of interactive scenarios. Machines2023; 11(7): 693–734.
17.
World Health Organization. Global report on health equity for persons with disabilities. [Internet]. World Health Organization, 2022. [cited 2025 January 28]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240063600
18.
Anderson-ChavarriaM. The autism predicament: models of autism and their impact on autistic identity. Disabil Soc2021; 37(8): 1321–1341.
19.
AlcornAMAingerECharisiV, et al.Educators’ views on using humanoid robots with autistic learners in special education settings in England. Front Robot AI2019; 12(2): 92–116.
20.
ThomRPWuMRavichandranC, et al.Clozapine for treatment refractory catatonia in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: a retrospective chart review study. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol2023; 16(9): 865–875.
21.
AlasmariMAlduaisAQasemF. A thematic review of autism spectrum disorder research in Saudi Arabia: insights into diagnosis, assessment, and language considerations. Appl Neuropsychol Child2023; 14(2): 236–250.
22.
WatrobaALuttinenJLappalainenP, et al.Effectiveness of school-based occupational therapy interventions on school skills and abilities among children with attention deficit hyperactivity and autism spectrum disorders: systematic review. J Occup Ther Sch Early Interv2023; 17(3): 671–703.
23.
AmirovaARakhymbayevaNYadollahiE, et al.10 years of human-NAO interaction research: a scoping review. Front Robot AI2021; 12(3): 123–156.
24.
RobaczewskiABouchardJBouchardK, et al.Socially assistive robots: the specific case of the NAO. Int J Soc Robot2021; 13(2): 795–831.
25.
PapakostasGASidiropoulosGKPapadopoulouCI, et al.Social robots in special education: a systematic review. Electronics2021; 10(12): 13–98.
26.
MeniadoJC. Digital language teaching 5.0: technologies, trends and competencies. RELC J2023; 54(2): 461–473.
27.
MazzeiDChiarelloFFantoniG. Analyzing social robotics research with natural language processing techniques. Cogn Comput2021; 13(1): 308–321.
28.
BamberMDSchneiderJK. College students’ perceptions mindfulness-based interventions: a narrative review of the qualitative research. Curr Psychol2022; 41(3): 667–680.
29.
SiddawayAPWoodAMHedgesLV. How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annu Rev Psycho2019; 70(3): 747–770.
30.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ, et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol2009; 62: 1006–1012.
31.
WangXChenYLiuY, et al.Reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture: the PRISMA for acupuncture checklist. BMC Complement Altern Med2019; 19(2): 208–224.
HuskensBVerschuurRGillesenJ, et al.Promoting question-asking in school-aged children with autism spectrum disorders: effectiveness of a robot intervention compared to a human-trainer intervention. Dev Neurorehabilit2013; 16(5): 345–356.
34.
WarrenZEZhengZSwansonAR, et al.Can robotic interaction improve joint attention skills?J Autism Dev Disord2013; 45: 3726–3734.
35.
AnzaloneSMTilmontEBoucennaS, et al.How children with autism spectrum disorder behave and explore the 4-dimensional (spatial 3d+ time) environment during a joint attention induction task with a robot. Res Autism Spectr Disord2014; 8(7): 814–826.
36.
BekeleECrittendonJASwansonA, et al.Pilot clinical application of an adaptive robotic system for young children with autism. Autism2014; 18(5): 598–608.
37.
BarakovaEIBajracharyaPWillemsenM, et al.Long-term LEGO therapy with humanoid robot for children with ASD. Expert Syst2014; 32(6): 698–709.
38.
KaboskiJRDiehlJJBeriontJ, et al.Brief report: a pilot summer robotics camp to reduce social anxiety and improve social/vocational skills in adolescents with ASD. J Autism Dev Disord2015; 45(1): 3862–3869.
39.
AzizAAMogananFFIsmailA, et al.Autistic children’s Kansei responses towards humanoid-robot as teaching mediator. Procedia Comput Sci2015; 76(2): 488–493.
40.
SrinivasanSMEigstiIMNeellyL, et al.The effects of embodied rhythm and robotic interventions on the spontaneous and responsive social attention patterns of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD): a pilot randomized controlled trial. Res Autism Spectr Disord2016; 27(10): 54–72.
41.
ChevalierPMartinJCIsableuB, et al.Impact of sensory preferences of individuals with autism on the recognition of emotions expressed by two robots, an avatar, and a human. Auton Robots2017; 41(1): 613–635.
42.
SoWCWongMKLamKY, et al.Using a social robot to teach gestural recognition and production in children with autism spectrum disorders. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol2018a; 13(6): 527–539.
43.
DavidDOCostescuCAMatuS, et al.Developing joint attention for children with autism in robot-enhanced therapy. Int J Soc Robot2018; 10(1): 595–605.
44.
DesideriLNegriniMMalavasiM, et al.Using a humanoid robot as a complement to interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder: a pilot study. Adv Neurodev Disord2018; 2(3): 273–285.
45.
SoWCWongMKYYiLW, et al.Robot-based intervention may reduce delay in the production of intransitive gestures in Chinese-speaking preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder. Mol Autism2018b; 9(2): 34–49.
46.
TaheriAMeghdariAAlemiM, et al.Human–robot interaction in autism treatment: a case study on three pairs of autistic children as twins, siblings, and classmates. Int J Soc Robot2018; 10(3): 93–113.
47.
ChungEY. Robotic intervention program for enhancement of social engagement among children with autism spectrum disorder. J Dev Phys Disabil2019; 31(3): 419–434.
48.
ZhangYSongWTanZ, et al.Could social robots facilitate children with autism spectrum disorders in learning distrust and deception?Comput Hum Behav2019; 98(2): 140–149.
49.
AnzaloneSMXavierJBoucennaS, et al.Quantifying patterns of joint attention during human–robot interactions: an application for autism spectrum disorder assessment. Pattern Recognit Lett2019; 11(8): 42–50.
50.
QidwaiUKashemSBAConorO. Humanoid robot as a teacher’s assistant: helping children with autism to learn social and academic skills. J Intell Robot Syst2020; 98(3): 759–770.
51.
MarinoFChilàPSfrazzettoST, et al.Outcomes of a robot-assisted social-emotional understanding intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord2020; 50(12): 1973–1987.
52.
DavidDOCostescuCAMatuS, et al.Effects of a robot-enhanced intervention for children with ASD on teaching turn-taking skills. J Educ Comput Res2020; 58(1): 29–62.
53.
Romero-GarcíaRMartínez-TomásRPozoP, et al.Q-CHAT-NAO: a robotic approach to autism screening in toddlers. J Biomed Inform2021; 11(8): 103–117.
54.
ChungEY. Robot-mediated social skill intervention programme for children with autism spectrum disorder: an ABA time-series study. Int J Soc Robot2021; 13(2): 1095–1107.
55.
KimSHirokawaMMatsudaS, et al.Smiles as a signal of prosocial behaviors toward the robot in the therapeutic setting for children with autism spectrum disorder. Front Robot AI2021; 12(8): 599–755.
56.
TaheriAShariatiAHeidariR, et al.Impacts of using a social robot to teach music to children with low-functioning autism. J Behav Robot2021a; 12(1): 256–275.
57.
BarnesJAParkCHHowardA, et al.Child-robot interaction in a musical dance game: an exploratory comparison study between typically developing children and children with autism. Int J Hum Comput Interact2021; 37(3): 249–266.
58.
TaheriAMeghdariAMahoorMH. A close look at the imitation performance of children with autism and typically developing children using a robotic system. Int J Soc Robot2021b; 13(4): 1125–1147.
59.
Urdanivia AlarconDACanoSPaucarFHR, et al.Exploring the effect of robot-based video interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder as an alternative to remote education. Electronics2021; 10(21): 25–77.
60.
de Souza JeronimoBde Albuquerque WhelerAPde OliveiraJPG, et al.Comparing social robot embodiment for child musical education. J Intell Robot Syst2022; 105(3): 28–43.
61.
NagaeTLeeJ. Understanding emotions in children with developmental disabilities during robot therapy using EDA. Sensors2022; 22(14): 51–72.
62.
van StratenCLPeterJKühneR, et al.On sharing and caring: investigating the effects of a robot’s self-disclosure and question- Asking on children’s robot perceptions and child-robot relationship formation. Comput Hum Behav2022; 129(6): 107–135.
63.
PapadopoulouMTKarageorgiouEKechayasP, et al.Efficacy of a robot-assisted intervention in improving learning performance of elementary school children with specific learning disorders. Children2022; 9(8): 11–55.
64.
KornederJLouieWYGPawlukCM, et al.Robot-mediated interventions for teaching children with ASD: a new intraverbal skill. Assist Technol2022; 34(6): 707–716.
65.
TelishevaZAmirovaARakhymbayevaN, et al.The quantitative case-by-case analyses of the socio-emotional outcomes of children with ASD in robot-assisted autism therapy. Multimodal Technol Interact2022; 6(6): 46–68.
66.
BarakaKCoutoMMeloFS, et al.“Sequencing matters”: investigating suitable action sequences in robot-assisted autism therapy. Front Robot AI2022; 9(1): 78–102.
67.
MutawaAMAl MudhahkahHMAl-HuwaisA, et al.Augmenting mobile app with NAO robot for autism education. Machines2023; 11(8): 833–852.
68.
Al-NafjanAAlhakbaniNAlabdulkareemA. Measuring engagement in robot-assisted therapy for Autistic children. Behav Sci2023; 13(2): 618–634.
69.
AmirovaARakhymbayevaNZhanatkyzyA, et al.Effects of parental involvement in robot-assisted autism therapy. J Autism Dev Disord2023; 53(1): 438–455.
70.
KostrubiecVLajuntaCPaubelPV, et al.Does the social robot nao facilitate cooperation in high functioning children with ASD?Int J Soc Robot2024; 16(2): 281–298.
71.
LorenzoGLorenzo-LledóA. The use of artificial intelligence for detecting the duration of autistic students’ emotions in social interaction with the NAO robot: a case study. Int J Inf Technol2024; 16(5): 625–631.
72.
ChungEYKuen-fung SinKDhkC. Effectiveness of robotic intervention on improving social development and participation of children with autism spectrum disorder – a randomized controlled trial. J Autism Dev Disord2024; 55(2): 449–456.
73.
LinWPengXChengY. Using intelligent robots to detect body language and improve social development in children with autism spectrum disorder. Int J Intell Robot Appl2024; 12(2): 123–138.
74.
LorenzoLGLorenzo-LledóAGilabert-CerdáA. Application of robotics in autistic students: a pilot study on attention in communication and social interaction. Technol Knowl Learn2024b; 29(3): 757–780.
75.
ZhaoWZhangLHouW, et al.NAO robot promoting sensorimotor synchronization in high-functioning autism spectrum disorder children. Int J Dev Disabil2024; 12(3): 1–15.
76.
AlnafjanAAlghamdiMAlhakbaniN, et al.Improving imitation skills in children with autism spectrum disorder using the NAO robot and a human action recognition. Diagnostics2025; 15(1): 60–74.
77.
CifuentesCAPintoMJCéspedesN, et al.Social robots in therapy and care. Curr Robot Repo2020; 12(1): 59–74.
78.
PodpečanV. Can you dance? A study of child-robot interaction and emotional response using the NAO robot. Multimodal Technol Interact2023; 7(1): 1–14.
79.
RizosIFoykasEGeorgakopoulosSV. Enhancing mathematics education for students with special educational needs through generative AI: a case study in Greece. Contemp Educ Technol2024; 16(4): ep535.
80.
SlavkovićSĆeranićIDesideriL. Exploring the possibilities of using assistive technology for people with multiple sclerosis. Technol Disabil2025; 37(2): 168–177.
81.
Ma-thiCTruong-ducTNgoT-D, et al.An assistive IOT smart control system for people with severe mobility disabilities. Technol Disabil2024; 36(3): 85–98.
82.
ValagkoutiITroussasCKrouskaA, et al.Emotion recognition in Human-Robot interaction using NAO Robot. Computers2022; 11(5): 1–13.
83.
AlnajjarFCappuccioMRenawiA, et al.Personalized robot interventions for autistic children: an automated methodology for attention assessment. Int J Soc Robot2021; 24(13): 67–82.
84.
PoortIJansenEHofmanA. Does the group matter? Effects of trust, cultural diversity, and group formation on engagement in group work in higher education. High Educ Res Dev2020; 41(2): 511–526.
