The present review on prosthetic running blades is a comprehensive exploration of the multifaceted advancements and challenges within prosthetic technology for running. Given the transformative potential of these blades in enhancing mobility and quality of life for amputees, understanding their evolution, current state, and future directions is paramount. The present work sheds light on the technological innovations that have shaped the current generation of prosthetic blades. The review provides a holistic understanding of the intricate balance between engineering and human biomechanics by delving into materials, biomechanical optimizations, and integrating sensors and feedback systems. Such insights are crucial for researchers aiming to push the boundaries of what’s possible and clinicians seeking to provide the best care for their patients. Furthermore, by addressing challenges such as affordability, accessibility, and the need for user-centric design, the work underscores the more general societal and moral concerns. Moreover, the review’s emphasis on blades offers a more rounded perspective. Beyond the physical benefits, understanding the mental health implications, body image perceptions, and potential societal stigmas associated with prosthetic use is crucial for holistic patient care.
SiddiquiMIHArifudinLAlnaserIA, et al.Numerical investigation on the performance of prosthetic running blades by using different materials. Journal of Disability Research2023; 2(1): 6–13.
2.
RahmanMBennettTGlissonD, et al.Finite element analysis of prosthetic running blades using different composite materials to optimize performance. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Proceedings (IMECE)2014; 10(1): 1–14.
3.
YasserA. Design and structural analysis of composite prosthetic running blades for athletes. A case of dynamic explicit analysis using Abaqus CAE2020.
4.
HiziWRahmouniHGorjiNE, et al.Impact of sintering temperature on the electrical properties of La0.9Sr0.1MnO3 manganite. Catalysts2022; 12(3): 340. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/12/3/340/htm
5.
CampbellAISextonSSchaschkeCJ, et al.Prosthetic limb sockets from plant-based composite materials. Prosthet Orthot Int2012; 36(2): 181–189.
6.
AboodSHFaidh-AllahMH. Analysis of prosthetic running blade of limb using different composite materials. Jcoeng2019; 25(12): 15–25.
7.
ShastryGTobyAKumbharMB, et al.Simulation and optimization of materials used for prosthetic leg for above-knee amputees using MR fluid. Mater Today Proc2021; 45: 5292–5298.
8.
TallaHKOleiwiJKHassanAKF. Performance of athletic prosthetic feet made of various composite materials with pmma matrix: numerical and theoretical study. Rev Compos Matériaux Avancés2021; 31(4): 257–264.
9.
AlluhydanKSiddiquiMIHElkananiH. Functionality and comfort design of lower-limb prosthetics: a review. Journal of Disability Research2023; 2(3): 10–23.
10.
Standards for prosthetic orthotics services provision part 1. Geneva: WHO, 2017.
11.
BrackRAmaluEH. A review of technology, materials and R&D challenges of upper limb prosthesis for improved user suitability. J Orthop2021; 23(December 2020): 88–96. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.12.009.
12.
GallagherPMacLachlanM. Adjustment to an artificial limb: a qualitative perspective. J Health Psychol2001; 6(1): 85–100.
13.
HorganOMacLachlanM. Psychosocial adjustment to lower-limb amputation: a review. Disabil Rehabil2004; 26(14–15): 837–850.
14.
CrimìAJoyceDMBinitieO, et al.The history of resection prosthesis. Int Orthop2023; 47(3): 873–883.
15.
ImmlerLSchindelwigKHeinrichD, et al.Individual flexion stiffness of ski boots. J Sci Med Sport2019; 22: S55–S59.
16.
LehmannJFPriceRBoswell-BessetteS, et al.Comprehensive analysis of energy storing prosthetic feet: Flex Foot and Seattle Foot versus standard SACH foot. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1993; 74(11): 1225–1231.
17.
SiddiquiMIHArifudinLAlnaserIA, et al.Static behavior of a prosthetic running blade made from alloys and carbon fiber. J Disa Res2023; 2(1): 63–74.
18.
HironsR. Preparing our Paralympians: research and development at ossur, UK. Interview by sarah A. Curran. Prosthet Orthot Int2012; 36(3): 366–369.
19.
AsifMTiwanaMIKhanUS, et al.Advancements, trends and future prospects of lower limb prosthesis. IEEE Access2021; 9: 85956–85977.
20.
SeppLABaumBSNelson-WongE, et al.Dynamic balance during running using running-specific prostheses. J Biomech2019; 84: 36–45.
21.
HeitzmannDWWLeboucherJBlockJ, et al.The influence of hip muscle strength on gait in individuals with a unilateral transfemoral amputation. PLoS One2020; 15(9 September): e0238093.
22.
LeeWCCZhangMBooneDA, et al.Finite-element analysis to determine effect of monolimb flexibility on structural strength and interaction between residual limb and prosthetic socket. J Rehabil Res Dev2004; 41(6 A): 775–786.
23.
VermaNLevyISarmaD, et al.Bilateral symmetry in ankle-muscle activation in transtibial amputees. In: Proceedings of the annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, EMBS. Piscataway: IEEE, 2020, pp. 3775–3778.
24.
Hernández-StenderCLMolina-RuedaFCuesta-GómezA, et al.Lower limb muscle activation during outdoor running: differences between sprinters, middle-distance and long-distance runners. Sports Biomech2021; 23(7):949–960.
25.
SilvaMFDiasJMDela BelaLF, et al.A review on muscle activation behaviour during gait in shallow water and deep-water running and surface electromyography procedures. J Bodyw Mov Ther2020; 24: 432–441.
26.
ZhangRZhaoLKongQ, et al.Multi-objective design and optimization of high cushioning bionic shoe midsole under limited thickness of forefoot. Compos Struct2023; 324: 117560.
27.
WilsonJRAsfourSAbdelrahmanKZ, et al.A new methodology to measure the running biomechanics of amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int2009; 33(3): 218–229.
28.
MorinJBSamozinoPZameziatiK, et al.Effects of altered stride frequency and contact time on leg-spring behavior in human running. J Biomech2007; 40(15): 3341–3348.
29.
SiddiquiMIHAlnaserIAAlluhydanK. Assessment of a carbon fiber prosthetic running blade for enhanced reliability. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność – Maintenance and Reliability2023; 25. DOI: 10.17531/ein/172668.
30.
GirardOBrocherieFMorinJB, et al.Running mechanics and leg muscle activity patterns during early and late acceleration phases of repeated treadmill sprints in male recreational athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol2020; 120(12): 2785–2796.
31.
JafarnezhadgeroAAPourrahimghoroghchiADarvishaniMA, et al.Analysis of ground reaction forces and muscle activity in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during different running strike patterns. Gait Posture2021; 90: 204–209.
32.
HallJPLBartonCJonesPR, et al.The biomechanical differences between barefoot and shod distance running: a systematic review and preliminary meta-analysis. Sports Med2013; 43: 1335–1353.
33.
SongJLHidlerJ. Biomechanics of overground vs. treadmill walking in healthy individuals. J Appl Physiol2008; 104(3): 747–755.
34.
YongJRSilderADelpSL. Differences in muscle activity between natural forefoot and rearfoot strikers during running. J Biomech2014; 47(15): 3593–3597.
35.
DuganSABhatKP. Biomechanics and analysis of running gait. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am2005; 16: 603–621.
36.
SimonsenEB. Contributions to the understanding of gait control. Dan Med J2014; 61(4): B4823.
37.
AlmeidaMODavisISLopesAD. Biomechanical differences of foot-strike patterns during running: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther2015; 45: 738–755.
38.
MakAFTZhangMBooneDA. State-of-the-art research in lower-limb prosthetic biomechanics-socket interface: a review. J Rehabil Res Dev2001; 38: 161–174.
39.
BattenHRMcPhailSMMandrusiakAM, et al.Gait speed as an indicator of prosthetic walking potential following lower limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int2019; 43(2): 196–203.
40.
Van Der LindeHHofstadCJGeurtsACH, et al.A systematic literature review of the effect of different prosthetic components on human functioning with a lower-limb prosthesis. J Rehabil Res Dev2004; 41: 555–570.
41.
LaferrierJZGaileyR. Advances in lower-limb prosthetic technology. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am2010; 21: 87–110.
42.
MurrayCDFoxJ. Body image and prosthesis satisfaction in the lower limb amputee. Disabil Rehabil2002; 24(17): 925–931.
43.
Van der LindeHHofstadCJGeertzenJHB, et al.From satisfaction to expectation: the patient’s perspective in lower limb prosthetic care. Disabil Rehabil2007; 29(13): 1049–1055.
44.
SchmalzTBlumentrittSJaraschR. Energy expenditure and biomechanical characteristics of lower limb amputee gait: the influence of prosthetic alignment and different prosthetic components. Gait Posture2002; 16(3): 255–263.
45.
HofstadCJvan der LindeHvan LimbeekJ, et al.Prescription of prosthetic ankle-foot mechanisms after lower limb amputation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2004; 2010: CD003978.
46.
MillerWCDeatheABSpeechleyM. Lower extremity prosthetic mobility: a comparison of 3 self-report scales. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2001; 82(10): 1432–1440.
47.
Al MuderisMLuWLiJ. Osseointegrated Prosthetic Limb for the treatment of the lower limb amputations: experience and outcomes. Unfallchirurg2017; 120(4): 306–311.
48.
EnnionLManigS. Experiences of lower limb prosthetic users in a rural setting in the Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. Prosthet Orthot Int2019; 43(2): 170–179.
49.
RoffmanCEBuchananJAllisonGT. Predictors of non-use of prostheses by people with lower limb amputation after discharge from rehabilitation: development and validation of clinical prediction rules. J Physiother2014; 60(4): 224–231.
50.
EshraghiAOsmanNAAGholizadehH, et al.Pistoning assessment in lower limb prosthetic sockets. Prosthet Orthot Int2012; 36: 15–24.
51.
MaqboolHFHusmanMABAwadMI, et al.A real-time gait event detection for lower limb prosthesis control and evaluation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2017; 25(9): 1500–1509.
52.
SpaanMHVrielingAHvan de BergP, et al.Predicting mobility outcome in lower limb amputees with motor ability tests used in early rehabilitation. Prosthet Orthot Int2017; 41(2): 171–177.
53.
TurnerSMcGregorAH. Perceived effect of socket fit on major lower limb prosthetic rehabilitation: a clinician and amputee perspective. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl2020; 2(3): 100059.
54.
DouglasTSolomonidisSSandhamW, et al.Ultrasound imaging in lower limb prosthetics. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2002; 10(1): 11–21.
55.
MuninMCDe GuzmanMCEBoningerML, et al.Predictive factors for successful early prosthetic ambulation among lower-limb amputees. J Rehabil Res Dev2001; 38(4): 379–384.
56.
RasmussenCMHuntNH. Unconstrained slip mechanics and stepping reactions depend on slip onset timing. J Biomech2021; 125: 110572.
57.
CárdenasAMUribeJFont-LlagunesJM, et al.The effect of prosthetic alignment on the stump temperature and ground reaction forces during gait in transfemoral amputees. Gait Posture2022; 95: 76–83.
58.
KimJWensmanJColabianchiN, et al.The influence of powered prostheses on user perspectives, metabolics, and activity: a randomized crossover trial. J NeuroEng Rehabil2021; 18(1): 49.
59.
PetriniFMBumbasirevicMValleG, et al.Sensory feedback restoration in leg amputees improves walking speed, metabolic cost and phantom pain. Nat Med2019; 25(9): 1356–1363.
60.
CheeLValleGMarazziM, et al.Optimally-calibrated non-invasive feedback improves amputees’ metabolic consumption, balance and walking confidence. J Neural Eng2022; 19(4).
61.
ColtelliMAKeevenJMLeckieJM, et al.Output force density saturation in COMSOL simulations of biomimetic artificial muscles. Applied Sciences2023; 13(16): 9286. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/16/9286
62.
ThesleffAOrtiz-CatalanMBrånemarkR. Low plasticity burnishing improves fretting fatigue resistance in bone-anchored implants for amputation prostheses. Med Eng Phys2022; 100: 103755.
63.
BrisswalterJNosakaK. Neuromuscular factors associated with decline in long-distance running performance in master athletes. Sports Med2013; 43: 51–63.
64.
NummelaATPaavolainenLMSharwoodKA, et al.Neuromuscular factors determining 5 km running performance and running economy in well-trained athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol2006; 97(1): 1–8.
65.
BassettDRHowleyET. Limiting factors for maximum oxygen uptake and determinants of endurance performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc2000; 32(1): 70–84.
66.
SaundersPUPyneDBTelfordRD, et al.Factors affecting running economy in trained distance runners. Sports Med2004; 34: 465–485.
67.
RyanSCouttsAJHockingJ, et al.Factors affecting match running performance in professional Australian football. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2017; 12(9): 1199–1204.
68.
SuchomelTJNimphiusSStoneMH. The importance of muscular strength in athletic performance. Sports Med2016; 46: 1419–1449.
69.
BlackGMGabbettTJNaughtonG, et al.The influence of contextual factors on running performance in female Australian football match-play. J Strength Cond Res2019; 33(9): 2488–2495.
70.
TrewinJMeylanCVarleyMC, et al.Effect of match factors on the running performance of elite female soccer players. J Strength Cond Res2018; 32(7): 2002–2009.
71.
HaugenTATønnessenESeilerSK. The difference is in the start: impact of timing and start procedure on sprint running performance. J Strength Cond Res2012; 26(2): 473–479.
72.
VikmoenORaastadTSeynnesO, et al.Effects of heavy strength training on running performance and determinants of running performance in female endurance athletes. PLoS One2016; 11(3): e0150799.
73.
TabogaPDreesEKBeckON, et al.Prosthetic model, but not stiffness or height, affects maximum running velocity in athletes with unilateral transtibial amputations. Sci Rep2020; 10(1): 1763.
74.
El HabachiAMoissenetFDupreyS, et al.Global sensitivity analysis of the joint kinematics during gait to the parameters of a lower limb multi-body model. Med Biol Eng Comput2015; 53(7): 655–667.
75.
Zhang-LeaJHTaccaJRBeckON, et al.Equivalent running leg lengths require prosthetic legs to be longer than biological legs during standing. Sci Rep2023; 13(1): 7679.
76.
ThomasJPSoKLTurnerJT, et al.Optimal conduit choice for open lower extremity bypass in chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Semin Vasc Surg2022; 35(2): 172–179.
77.
SugawaraATSimisMFregniF, et al.Characterisation of phantom limb pain in traumatic lower-limb amputees. Pain Res Manag2021; 2021: 2706731.
78.
BeckONTabogaPGrabowskiAM. Reduced prosthetic stiffness lowers the metabolic cost of running for athletes with bilateral transtibial amputations. J Appl Physiol2017; 122(4): 976–984.
79.
GroothuisAHoudijkH. The effect of prosthetic alignment on prosthetic and total leg stiffness while running with simulated running-specific prostheses. Front Sports Act Living2019; 1: 16.
80.
Tuakli-WosornuYALiXOna AyalaKE, et al.The impact of blade technology on paralympic sprint performance between 1996 and 2016: bilateral amputees’ competitive advantage. Adapt Phys Activ Q2021; 38(3): 494–505.
81.
GroblerLFerreiraSVanwanseeleB, et al.Characterisation of the responsive properties of two running-specific prosthetic models. Prosthet Orthot Int2017; 41(2): 141–148.
82.
BarnettCTDe AshaARSkervinTK, et al.Spring-mass behavioural adaptations to acute changes in prosthetic blade stiffness during submaximal running in unilateral transtibial prosthesis users. Gait Posture2022; 98: 153–159.
83.
FischerGAntunesDVolpatoA, et al.Metabolic cost and performance of athletes with lower limb amputation and nonamputee matched controls during running: a systematic review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2022; 101(6): 584–589.
84.
ConnickMJBeckmanEIbusukiT, et al.Evaluation of methods for calculating maximum allowable standing height in amputees competing in Paralympic athletics. Scand J Med Sci Sports2016; 26(11): 1353–1359.
85.
PeeryJTKluteGKBlevinsJJ, et al.A three-dimensional finite element model of the transibial residual limb and prosthetic socket to predict skin temperatures. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2006; 14(3): 336–343.
86.
ChinTSawamuraSFujitaH, et al.%VO2max as an indicator of prosthetic rehabilitation outcome after dysvascular amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int2002; 26(1): 44–49.
87.
Girish BurandeCPadhiSN. Theoretical evaluation of ankle foot orthosis made of carbon fiber, polyethylene and structural steel. Mater Today Proc2023.
88.
WagleCPadhiSN. Comparison of carbon fiber and glass fiber partial foot orthosis by Experimental and computational method. Mater Today Proc2023.
89.
HameedMIAbdulAAliH. Finite element design and manufacturing of a woven carbon fiber prosthetic foot. Ass Arab Univ J Eng Scienc2022; 29(2).
90.
KonadaNKKokaNSS. Finite element analysis on prosthetic leg under different loads and flexion angles for medical applications. J Mec Energ Eng2022; 6.
91.
Trejo-LetechipiaMARodriguez-SanchezDAGonzález-GonzálezRB, et al.Design and manufacturing of a body-powered hook with force regulation system and composite-based nanomaterials. Appl Sci2021; 11(9).
92.
SrinivasanVGovarthanPKOm PrakashS, et al.Composite blades for lower extremity amputees. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2022; 1258(1): 012044.
93.
YangRLiuY-YWangG-X, et al.Effects of hybrid structure on properties of glass-carbon hybrid fibers composite. In: 2017 3rd International Forum on Energy, Environment Science and Materials (IFEESM 2017). Dordrecht: Atlantis Press, 2018, pp. 1660–1665.
94.
WuWWangQIchenihiA, et al.The effects of hybridization on the flexural performances of carbon/glass interlayer and intralayer composites. Polymers2018; 10(5): 549.
95.
MandersPWBaderMG. The strength of hybrid glass/carbon fibre composites: Part 1 Failure strain enhancement and failure mode. J Mater Sci1981; 16: 2233–2245.
96.
MandersPWBaderMG. The strength of hybrid glass/carbon fibre composites: part 2 a statistical model. J Mater Sci1981; 16: 2246–2256.
97.
WilsonHJTomlinHROsborneJ. The assessment of temporary soft materials used in prosthetics. Br Dent J1969; 126(7): 303–306.
98.
RaszewskiZNowakowska-ToporowskaANowakowskaD, et al.Update on acrylic resins used in dentistry. Mini Rev Med Chem2021; 21(15): 2130–2137.
99.
SandersDLKingsnorthAN. Prosthetic mesh materials used in hernia surgery. Expert Rev Med Devices2012; 9: 159–179.
100.
PowellSKCruzRLJRossMT, et al.Past, present, and future of soft-tissue prosthetics: advanced polymers and advanced manufacturing. Adv Mater2020; 32(42): e2001122.
101.
SandersJENicholsonBSZachariahSG, et al.Testing of elastomeric liners used in limb prosthetics: classification of 15 products by mechanical performance. J Rehabil Res Dev2004; 41(2): 175–186.
102.
MarotiPVargaPAbrahamH, et al.Printing orientation defines anisotropic mechanical properties in additive manufacturing of upper limb prosthetics. Mater Res Express2019; 6(3): 035403.
103.
IonescuRNTotanARImreMM, et al.Prosthetic materials used for implant-supported restorations and their biochemical oral interactions: a narrative review. Materials2022; 15: 1016.
104.
ChandYBMahendraJJigeeshN, et al.Comparison of stress distribution and deformation of four prosthetic materials in full-mouth rehabilitation with implants: a three-dimensional finite element study. J Contemp Dent Pract2020; 21(11): 1210–1217.
105.
PituruSMGreabuMTotanA, et al.A review on the biocompatibility of PMMA-Based dental materials for interim prosthetic restorations with a glimpse into their modern manufacturing techniques. Materials2020; 13: 2894.
106.
ShaharFSHameed SultanMTLeeSH, et al.A review on the orthotics and prosthetics and the potential of kenaf composites as alternative materials for ankle-foot orthosis. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2019; 99: 169–185.
107.
SobolewskaEFraczakBCzarnomysy-FurowiczD, et al.Bacteria adhesion to the surface of various prosthetics materials. Ann Acad Med Stetin2007; 53(2): 68–71.
108.
YangJCMunJKwonSY, et al.Electronic skin: recent progress and future prospects for skin-attachable devices for health monitoring, robotics, and prosthetics. Adv Mater2019; 31: e1904765.
109.
SkorulskaAPiszkoPRybakZ, et al.Review on polymer, ceramic and composite materials for cad/cam indirect restorations in dentistry—application, mechanical characteristics and comparison. Materials2021; 14: 1592.
110.
OuarhimWAit-DahiMBensalahMO, et al.Characterization and numerical simulation of laminated glass fiber–polyester composites for a prosthetic running blade. J Reinforc Plast Compos2021; 40(3–4): 118–133.
111.
HattiPSSomanakattiABRakshithM. Stress and failure analysis of composite prosthetic leg. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2021; 1168(1): 012009.
112.
KitilaLGWollaDW. Fabrication, characterization, and simulation of hybrid flax-sisal fiber reinforced epoxy composite for prosthetic limb socket application. J Compos Mater2022; 56(10): 1605–1614.
113.
BeckONTabogaPGrabowskiAM. Prosthetic model, but not stiffness or height, affects the metabolic cost of running for athletes with unilateral transtibial amputations. J Appl Physiol2017; 123(1): 38–48.
114.
BrüggemannGPArampatzisAEmrichF, et al.Biomechanics of double transtibial amputee sprinting using dedicated sprinting prostheses. Sports Technol2009; 1(4–5): 220–227.
115.
KahleJTHighsmithMJHubbardSL. Comparison of nonmicroprocessor knee mechanism versus C-Leg on Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire, stumbles, falls, walking tests, stair descent, and knee preference. J Rehabil Res Dev2008; 45(1): 1–14.
116.
MileusnicMPRettingerLHighsmithMJ, et al.Benefits of the Genium microprocessor controlled prosthetic knee on ambulation, mobility, activities of daily living and quality of life: a systematic literature review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol2021; 16(5): 453–464.
117.
HighsmithMJGoffLMLewandowskiAL, et al.Low back pain in persons with lower extremity amputation: a systematic review of the literature. Spine J2019; 19(3): 552–563.
118.
PrinceFWinterDASjonnesenG, et al.A new technique for the calculation of the energy stored, dissipated, and recovered in different ankle-foot prostheses. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng1994; 2(4): 247–255.
119.
PowellCWheeldonRK. Mechanical efficiency during gait of adults with transtibial amputation: a pilot study comparing the SACH, Seattle, and Golden-Ankle prosthetic feet. Development1998; 35(2): 177–185.
120.
WeyandPGBundleMWMcgowanCP, et al.Downloaded from journals.physiology.org/journal/jappl at Northeastern Univ Lib. J Appl Physiol2009; 107.
121.
WeyandPGBrooksLCPrajapatiS, et al.Artificially long legs directly enhance long sprint running performance. R Soc Open Sci2022; 9(8): 220397.
122.
BeckONTabogaPGrabowskiAM. Characterizing the mechanical properties of running-specific prostheses. PLoS One2016; 11(12): e0168298.
123.
DyerB. The impact of lower-limb prosthetic limb use in international C4 track para-cycling. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol2018; 13(8): 798–802.
124.
SeymourREngbretsonBKottK, et al.Comparison between the C-leg® microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee and non-microprocessor control prosthetic knees: a preliminary study of energy expenditure, obstacle course performance, and quality of life survey. Prosthet Orthot Int2007; 31(1): 51–61.
125.
HobaraHMurataHHisanoG, et al.Biomechanical determinants of top running speeds in para-athletes with unilateral transfemoral amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int2022; 47: 10–1097.
126.
LeeSPBonczykADimapilisMK, et al.Direction of attentional focus in prosthetic training: current practice and potential for improving motor learning in individuals with lower limb loss. PLoS One2022; 17(7 July): e0262977.
127.
LiLChengG. Structural design of upper limb rehabilitation training device based on ergonomics and nanomaterials. Nanotechnol Environ Eng2022; 7(1): 1–9.
128.
ClarkRA. The effect of training status on inter-limb joint stiffness regulation during repeated maximal sprints. J Sci Med Sport2009; 12(3): 406–410.
129.
JordanARTewGAHutchinsSW, et al.Three-curve rocker-soled shoes and gait adaptations to intermittent claudication pain: a randomised crossover trial. Gait Posture2019; 67: 31–36.
130.
LiYSimpsonKJNolanL, et al.Lower extremity kinematics of curve sprinting displayed by runners using a transtibial prosthesis. J Sports Sci2018; 36(3): 293–302.
131.
PrinceJD. 3D printing: an industrial revolution. J Electron Resour Med Libr2014; 11(1): 39–45.
132.
BeckONTabogaPGrabowskiAM. How do prosthetic stiffness, height and running speed affect the biomechanics of athletes with bilateral transtibial amputations?J R Soc Interface2017; 14(131): 20170230.
133.
SchnallBLDearthCLElrodJM, et al.A more compliant prosthetic foot better accommodates added load while walking among Servicemembers with transtibial limb loss. J Biomech2020; 98: 109395.
134.
FunkenJWillwacherSHeinrichK, et al.Long jumpers with and without a transtibial amputation have different three-dimensional centre of mass and joint take-off step kinematics. R Soc Open Sci2019; 6(4): 190107.
135.
BeckONAlenaMG. The biomechanics of the fastest sprinter with a unilateral transtibial amputation. J Appl Physiol2018; 124(3): 641–645.
136.
MorbiAPattenCLexellJ, et al.Design, control, and implementation of a robotic gait rehabilitation system for overground gait training. Gait Posture2014; 22(1).
137.
GaileyRKristalALucarevicJ, et al.The development and internal consistency of the comprehensive lower limb amputee socket survey in active lower limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int2019; 43(1): 80–87.
138.
EsquenaziA. Gait analysis in lower-limb amputation and prosthetic rehabilitation. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am2014; 25: 153–167.
139.
KluteGKBergeJSSegalAD. Heel-region properties of prosthetic feet and shoes. J Rehabil Res Dev2004; 41(4): 535–546.
140.
LehavotKYoungJPThomasRM, et al.Voices of women veterans with lower limb prostheses: a qualitative study. J Gen Intern Med2022; 37: 799–805.
141.
SandersJEZachariahSGJacobsenAK, et al.Changes in interface pressures and shear stresses over time on trans-tibial amputee subjects ambulating with prosthetic limbs: comparison of diurnal and six-month differences. J Biomech2005; 38(8): 1566–1573.
142.
KluteGKBergeJSBiggsW, et al.Vacuum-assisted socket suspension compared with pin suspension for lower extremity amputees: effect on fit, activity, and limb volume. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2011; 92(10): 1570–1575.
143.
PeeryJTLedouxWRKluteGK. Residual-limb skin temperature in transtibial sockets. J Rehabil Res Dev2005; 42(2): 147–154.
144.
KluteGKKantorCDarrouzetC, et al.Lower-limb amputee needs assessment using multistakeholder focus-group approach. J Rehabil Res Dev2009; 46(3): 293–304.
145.
GallagherPFranchignoniFGiordanoA, et al.Trinity amputation and prosthesis experience scales: a psychometric assessment using classical test theory and rasch analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2010; 89(6): 487–496.
146.
GrimmerMZeissJWeigandF, et al.Lower limb joint biomechanics-based identification of gait transitions in between level walking and stair ambulation. PLoS One2020; 15(9 September): e0239148.
147.
GallagherPMacLachlanM. Evaluating a written emotional disclosure homework intervention for lower-limb amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2002; 83(10): 1464–1466.
148.
BragaruMDekkerRGeertzenJHB. Sport prostheses and prosthetic adaptations for the upper and lower limb amputees: an overview of peer reviewed literature. Prosthet Orthot Int2012; 36(3): 290–296.
149.
HowellSMGillMSheltonTJ, et al.Reoperations are few and confined to the most valgus phenotypes 4 years after unrestricted calipered kinematically aligned TKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc2022; 30(3): 948–957.
150.
Silva A dasMFurtadoGdos SantosIP, et al.Functional capacity of elderly with lower-limb amputation after prosthesis rehabilitation: a longitudinal study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol2021; 16(5): 556–560.
151.
BarrSHoweTE. Prosthetic rehabilitation for older dysvascular people following a unilateral transfemoral amputation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2018; 2018(10): CD005260.
152.
BurgerHMarinčekČIsakovE. Mobility of persons after traumatic lower limb amputation. Disabil Rehabil1997; 19(7): 272–277.
153.
YerliyurtKTaşdelenTBEğriÖ, et al.Flexural properties of heat-polymerized PMMA denture base resins reinforced with fibers with different characteristics. Polymers2023; 15(15): 3211.
154.
SteerJWGrudniewskiPABrowneM, et al.Predictive prosthetic socket design: part 2—generating person-specific candidate designs using multi-objective genetic algorithms. Biomech Model Mechanobiol2020; 19(4): 1347–1360.
155.
SolisMJRRamírezJODSalazarJM, et al.Optimization of running blade prosthetics utilizing crow search algorithm assisted by artificial neural networks. Strojniski Vestnik/Journal of Mechanical Engineering2021; 67(3): 88–100.
156.
MauroyGde JaegerDVanmarsenilleJM, et al.The bouncing mechanism of running in a transfemoral amputee wearing a blade prosthesis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin2012; 15(Suppl 1(September)): 357–359.
157.
BrücknerLGawronO. The necessity for treatment paths for lower limb prosthetics: all that glitters is not gold. Orthopä2021; 50(1): 44–50.
158.
GohJCHLeePVSNgP. Structural integrity of polypropylene prosthetic sockets manufactured using the polymer deposition technique. Proc Inst Mech Eng H2002; 216(6): 359–368.
159.
KadhimFMTakhakhAMAbdullahAM. Mechanical properties of polymer with different reinforcement material composite that used for fabricates prosthetic socket. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Research and Developments2019; 42(4): 118–123.
160.
YangXZhaoRSolavD, et al.Material, design, and fabrication of custom prosthetic liners for lower-extremity amputees: a review. Med Nov Technol Devices2023; 17: 100197.
161.
Che MeRIbrahimRTahir PM. Natural based biocomposite material for prosthetic socket fabrication. ALAM CIPTA. Inter J Sust Trop Desig Res Pract2012; 5(1).
162.
GolovinMAMarusinNVPetrauskasMV, et al.3D-printed BK and AK prosthetic socket testing system. In: Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE conference of Russian young researchers in electrical and electronic engineering, EIConRus 2020. Piscataway: IEEE, 2020, pp. 124–126.
163.
Van Der SteltMVerhulstASlumpCH, et al.Design and production of low-cost 3D-printed transtibial prosthetic sockets. J Prosthet Orthot2023; 35(1): E30–E36.
164.
PohPSPChhayaMPWunnerFM, et al.Polylactides in additive biomanufacturing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev2016; 107: 228–246.
165.
AbubakreOKMedupinROAkintundeIB, et al.Carbon nanotube-reinforced polymer nanocomposites for sustainable biomedical applications: a review. J Sci Adv Mater Devices2023; 8(2): 100557.
166.
ChangHKimSKangTH, et al.Wearable piezoresistive sensors with ultrawide pressure range and circuit compatibility based on conductive-island-bridging nanonetworks. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2019; 11(35): 32291–32300.
167.
VarsavasSDRiemelmoserFArbeiterF, et al.A review of parameters affecting success of lower-limb prosthetic socket and liners and implementation of 3D printing technologies. Mater Today Proc2022; 70: 425–430.
168.
MiglioreGLPetroneNHobaraH, et al.Innovative alignment of sprinting prostheses for persons with transfemoral amputation: exploratory study on a gold medal Paralympic athlete. Prosthet Orthot Int2020; 45(1): 46–53.
169.
ShepherdMKGunzDClitesT, et al.Designing custom mechanics in running-specific prosthetic feet via shape optimization. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng2023; 70(2): 747–755.
