The one-group pretest–posttest pre-experimental design has been widely criticized, yet continues to be used in some clinical nursing research studies. This editorial explains what is wrong with the design, suggests reasons for its continued use, and gives some recommendations regarding what can be done about it.
CampbellD. T.StanleyJ. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. In GageN. L. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 171-246). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally. Reprinted in 1966 under the title Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research.
2.
GlassG. V. (1965). Evaluating testing, maturation, and treatment effects in a pretest- posttest quasi-experimental design. American Educational Research Journal, 2, 83-87.
3.
JohnsonC. W. (1986). A more rigorous quasi-experimental alternative to the one-group pretest-posttest design. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 585-591.
4.
LewisS. (1925). Arrowsmith. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.
5.
MarinB. V.MarinG.Perez-StableE. J.Otero-SabogalR.SabogalF. (1990). Cultural differences in attitudes toward smoking: Developing messages using the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 478-493.
