Prescribing Curiosity as an Antidote for Medicalized Discourse in Cancer Treatment

Abstract

This article explores how the language used in cancer, diagnosis, and treatment can shape and constrain patients’ experiences, often limiting personal agency. By analyzing verbatim excerpts from conversations between the authors, it highlights how dominant discourses in the medical field, such as positive thinking and war metaphors, can impose, psychological burdens. The authors advocate for incorporating curiosity and flexibility in patient interactions to enhance agency and personalization of care. Through Emily's specific experiences with thyroid cancer, this article examines common ideas that can minimize agency and suggests ways to foster more supportive and individualized responses from medical professionals and caregivers.