The discussion explores ethical issues associated with medical “gatekeeping” in relation to psychosocial health research associated with serious illness and loss. “Gatekeeping” is defined as the process whereby health-care providers prevent access to eligible patients for research recruitment. The impact of this practice on the research process is explored, including issues of sample representation, selection bias, and wastage of time and resources. The reflection of ethical issues is set in the context of research on clinical empathic responsiveness and accuracy, paternalism, and the ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, and justice.
Addington-HallJ. (2002) Research sensitivities to palliative care patients. European Journal of Cancer Care11: 220–224.
2.
AhrweilerF.NeumannM.GoldblattH.HahnE.SchefferC. (2014) Determinants of physician empathy during medical education: Hypothetical conclusions from an exploratory qualitative survey of practicing physicians. BMC Medical Education22(14): 122.
3.
BackA.DeignanP.PotterP. (2014) Compassion, compassion fatigue, and burnout: Key insights for oncology professionals. American Society Clinical Oncology Educational Book. e454–e459.
4.
BondS. L.ErlenJ.GladJ.SiminoffL. (2003) Recruiting vulnerable populations for research: Revisiting the ethical issues. Journal of Professional Nursing19(2): 106–112.
5.
BrunsF.FrewerA. (2011) Ethics consultation and empathy: Finding the balance in clinical settings. HEC Forum23(4): 247–255.
EwingG.RogersM.BarclayS.McCabeJ.MartinA.ToddC. (2004) Recruiting patients into a primary care based study of palliative care: Why is it so difficult?Palliative Medicine18(5): 452–459.
8.
ForrestC.GladeG.StarfieldB.BakerA.KangM.ReidR. (1999) Gatekeeping and referral of children and adolescents to speciality care. Pediatrics104(1 Pt 1): 28–34.
9.
GayL.AirosianP. (2000) Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application, 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
10.
GleichgerrchtE.DecetyJ. (2013) Empathy in clinical practice: How individual dispositions, gender, and experience moderate empathic concern, burnout, and emotional distress in physicians. PLoS One8(4): e61526.
11.
GulbrandsenP.FordeR.AaslandO. (2002) What does it feel like for a physician to be a gatekeeper?Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen122(19): 1874–1879.
12.
HeadB.FaulA. (2007) Research risks and benefits as perceived by persons with a terminal illness. Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing9: 256–263.
13.
HudsonP.ArandaS.KrisjansonL. (2005) Minimising gate-keeping in palliative care research. European Journal of Palliative Care12: 165–169.
14.
KarsM.van ThielG.van der GraafR.MoorsM.de GraeffA.van DeldenJ. (2015, November 17) A systematic review of gatekeeping in palliative care research. Palliative Medicine. . Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0269216315616759.
15.
LambicC.NordinK.SlodenP. (1995) Agreement between cancer patients and their physicians in the assessment of patient anxiety at follow-up clinics. Psycho-Oncology4: 225–236.
16.
LelorainS.BredartA.DolbeaultS.CanoA.Bonnaud-AntignacA.Cousson-GelieF.SultanS. (2014) How can we explain physician accuracy in assessing patient distress? A multilevel analysis in patients with advanced cancer. Patient Education and Counselling94(3): 322–327.
17.
LelorainS.SultanS.ZenasniF.Catu-PinaultA.JauryP.BoujutE.RigalL. (2013) Empathic concern and professional characteristics associated with clinical empathy in French general practitioners. The European Journal of General Practice19(1): 23–28.
18.
LemogneC. (2015) Empathy in medicine, necessary but not free from risks. La Revue du Praticien65(8): 1027–1030.
19.
LimB.MoriartyH.HuthwaiteM.GrayL.PullonS.GallagherP. (2013) How well do medical students rate and communicate clinical empathy?Medical Teacher35(2): e946–e951.
20.
McGrathP. (1999) Accommodation for patients and carers during relocation for treatment for leukaemia: A descriptive profile. Journal of Supportive Care in Cancer7(1): 6–10.
21.
McGrathP. (2000) ‘Taking control’: A prospective study of an educational support course for patients with leukaemia. Supportive Care in Cancer8(5): 377–384.
22.
McGrathP. (2003) ‘Living well with grief': Insights on bereavement support. Austral-Asian Journal of Cancer2(3): 225–233.
23.
McGrathP. (2013a) ‘Receptivity’: An important factor impacting on supportive care provision. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology31: 30–50.
24.
McGrathP. (2013b) End of life care in haematology: Update from Australia. Journal of Social Work in End of Life & Palliative Care9: 1–15.
25.
McGrathP. (2014a) Haematology patients’ desire to access metropolitan hospital expertise: Findings from Queensland. Australian Health Review40(3): 251–256.
26.
McGrathP. (2014b, November) Distance problems for patients in the 50 km radius. Partyline NRHA51: 40–41.
27.
McGrathP. (2014c) Patients’ perspectives on the usefulness of routine telephone follow-up as psychosocial support for hematologic malignancies: Australian findings. Oncology Nursing Forum41(1): 1–6.
28.
McGrathP. (2014d) Normalcy: An important focus for individuals diagnosed with a haematological malignancy. Illness, Crisis and Loss22(2): 115–126.
29.
McGrathP. (2015a) Parking problems: An important access issue for Australian specialist metropolitan hospitals. Health Issues114: 27–31.
30.
McGrathP. (2015b) Technology-based patient consultations: Research findings from haematology patients in regional, rural and remote Queensland. The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research8: 1199–1206.
31.
McGrathP. (2015c) ‘It is so hard. That is a huge distance between your family and treatment’: Findings on family issues during relocation for haematology care. Oncology Nursing Forum42(3): E250–E256.
32.
McGrathP. (2015d) Overcoming the distance barrier in relation to treatment for haematology patients: Queensland findings. Australian Health Review. . Advance online publication. doi:10.1071/AH14147.
33.
McGrathP. (2016a) ‘You never leave work when you live on a cattle property’: Special problems for rural property owners who have to relocate for specialist treatment. Australian Journal of Rural Health23: 286–290.
34.
McGrathP. (2016b) Financial assistance for patients who relocate for specialist care in haematology: Practical findings to inform nursing supportive care. Nursing Forum. . Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/nuf.12167.
35.
McGrathP. (2016c) Financial distress during relocation for treatment for haematology: Findings for social work. Social Work in Health Care55(4): 265–279.
36.
McGrathP. (2016d) ‘The bills that were coming in …’: Out of pocket costs during relocation for specialist treatment for haematological malignancies. Supportive Care in Cancer. . Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s00520-016-3104-7.
37.
McGrathP. (2016e) Informal financial assistance for patients with a haematological malignancy: Implications for Oncology Social Work Practice. Social Work in Health Care. . Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/00981389.2015.1061088.
38.
McGrathP. (2016f) The use of credit cards in response to the crisis of serious illness. Illness, Crisis & Loss24(1): 46–56.
39.
McGrathP.HolewaH. (2012) What does the term ‘survivor’ mean to individuals diagnosed with a haematological malignancy? Findings from Australia. Supportive Care in Cancer20: 3287–3295.
40.
McGrathP.HolewaH. (2014) Patient stories: An innovative direction for nurses providing support to haematology patients in rural areas. Nursing Forum49(3): 182–188.
41.
MercerS.ReynoldsW. (2002) Empathy and quality of care. British Journal of General Practice52(Suppl): S9–S12.
42.
NewellS.Sanson-FisherR.GirgisA.BonaventuraA. (1998) How well do medical oncologists’ perceptions reflect patients’ reported physical and psychological problems?Cancer83: 1640–1651.
43.
PassikS.DuganW.McDonaldM.RosenfeldB.TheobaldD.EdgertonS. (1998) Oncologists’ recognition of depression in their patients with cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology16: 1594–1600.
44.
PattersonS.MairsH.BorschmannR. (2011) Successful recruitment to trials: A phased approach to opening gates and building bridges. BMC Medical Research Methodology19(11): 73.
45.
PicardJ.Catu-PinaultA.BoujutE.BotellaM.JauryP.ZenasniF. (2016) Burnout, empathy and their relationships: A qualitative study with residents in General Medicine. Psychological Health Medicine21(3): 354–361.
46.
PoliticD.BeckC. (2008) Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice, 8th ed. London, England: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
47.
PollakK.ArnoldR.JeffreysA.AlexanderS.OlsenM.AbernethyA.TulskyJ. (2007) Oncologist communication about emotion during visits with patients with advanced cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology25(36): 5748–5752.
48.
SharkeyK.SavulescuJ.ArandaS.SchofieldP. (2010) Clinician gate-keeping in clinical research is not ethically defensible: An analysis. Journal of Medical Ethics36: 363–366.
49.
SöllnerW.De VriesA.SteixnerE.LukasP.SprinzlG.RumpoldG.MaislingerS. (2001) How successful are oncologists in identifying patient distress, perceived social support, and need for psychosocial counselling?British Journal of Cancer84(2): 179–185.
50.
TeutschC. (2003) Patient-doctor communication. Medical Clinics of North America87(5): 1115–1145.
51.
WhiteC.GilshenanK.HardyJ. (2008) A survey of the views of palliative care healthcare professionals towards referring cancer patients to participate in randomized controlled trials in palliative care. Supportive Care in Cancer16(12): 1397–1405.
52.
WilliamsG.PigeotI. (2016) Consent and confidentiality in the light of recent demands for data sharing. Biomedicine Journal. . Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/bimj.201500044.
53.
ZachariaeR.PedersenC.JensenA.EhrnroothE.RossenP.von der MaaseH. (2003) Association of perceived physician communication style with patient satisfaction, distress, cancer-related self-efficacy, and perceived control over the disease. British Journal of Cancer88(5): 658–665.
