This conceptual article describes a specific bereavement counseling intervention method for elaborating relational memories. Based in an integrative meaning reconstruction process of change, we show in a practical way how by promoting the display of the continuing bonds with the deceased and favoring the activation of memories about the lost relationship, the bereaved is able to engage in a process of attributing meaning, from which a new personal worldview emerges as a therapeutic outcome of personal posttraumatic growth. Using a case example to explain how the specific set of procedures of the method are implemented in clinical practice, the article focuses on the description of the client’s process of change, and how its components reflect the complementarity and interrelation of these theoretical constructs.
BoelenP. A.HuntjensR. J. (2008) Intrusive images in grief: An exploratory study. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy15: 217–226.
2.
BoernerK.HeckhausenJ. (2003) To have and have not: Adaptive bereavement by transforming mental ties to the deceased. Death Studies27: 199–226.
3.
BonannoG. A.WortmanC. B.LehmanD. R.TweedR. G.HaringM.SonnegaJ.NesseR. M. (2002) Resilience to loss and chronic grief: A prospective study from pre loss to 18-months post loss. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology83: 1150–1164.
4.
Calhoun, L. G., &Tedeschi, R. G. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of post traumatic growth: Research and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
5.
DavisC. G.Nolen-HoeksemaS.LarsonJ. (1998) Making sense of loss and benefiting from the experience: Two construals of meaning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology75: 561–574.
FolkmanS. (2001) Revised coping theory and the process of bereavement. In: StroebeM. S.HanssonR. O.StroebeW. E.SchutH. E. (eds) Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 563–584.
8.
GilliesJ.NeimeyerR. A. (2006) Loss, grief, and the search for significance: Toward a model of meaning reconstruction in bereavement. Journal of Constructivist Psychology19: 31–65.
9.
GreenbergL. (2002) Emotion-focused therapy: Coaching clients to work through feelings, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
10.
GreenbergL. S.ForesterF. S. (1996) Task analysis exemplified. The process of resolving unfinished business. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology64: 439–446.
11.
HershbergerP. J.WalshW. B. (1990) Multiple role involvements and the adjustment to conjugal bereavement: An exploratory study. Omega21: 91–102.
12.
Janoff-BulmanR. (2010) Shattered assumptions, New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
13.
JeffreysJ. S. (2011) Helping grieving people–When tears are not enough: A handbook for care providers, New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
Klass, D., Silverman, P. R., &Nickman, S. (Eds.). (2014). Continuing bonds: New understandings of grief. Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis.
15.
KlassD.WalterT. (2001) Processes of grieving: How bonds are continued. In: StroebeM. S.HanssonR. O.StroebeW.SchutH. (eds) Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 431–438.
16.
LeDouxJ. (1993) Emotional memory systems in the brain. Behavioural Brain Research58: 69–79.
17.
LeDouxJ. (1998) The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life, New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
18.
NeimeyerR. A. (2000) Lessons of loss, Memphis, TN: Center for the Study of Loss and Transition.
19.
Neimeyer, R. A. (Ed.). (2001). Meaning reconstruction and the experience of loss. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
20.
Neimeyer, R. A. (2016). Meaning reconstruction in the wake of loss: Evolution of a research program. Behaviour Change. doi: 10.1017/bec.2016.4.
21.
NeimeyerR. A.KlassD.DennisM. R. (2014) Mourning, meaning, and memory: Individual, communal, and cultural narration of grief. In: BatthyanyA.Russo-NetzerP. (eds) Meaning in Positive and existential psychology, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 325–346.
22.
NeimeyerR. A.LevittH. (2001) Coping and coherence: A narrative perspective. In: SnyderC. R. (ed.) Stress and coping, New York, NY: Oxford, pp. 47–67.
23.
NeimeyerR. A.SandsD. (2011) Meaning reconstruction in bereavement: From principles to practice. In: NeimeyerR. A.HarrisD.WinokuerH.ThorntonG. (eds) Grief and bereavement in contemporary society: Bridging research and practice, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 9–22.
24.
OgdenP.FisherJ. (2014) Sensorimotor psychotherapy: Interventions for trauma and attachment, New York, NY: Norton.
25.
OgdenP.MintonK.PainC. (2009) El trauma y el cuerpo. Un modelo sensoriomotriz de psicoterapia, Bilbao, Spain: Desclée de Brouwer.
26.
ParkC. L.FolkmanS. (1997) Meaning in the context of stress and coping. Review of General Psychology1: 115–144.
27.
PayàsA. (2010) Las tareas del duelo. Psicoterapia del duelo desde un modelo integrativo relacional, Barcelona, Spain: Paidós.
28.
PerlsF.HefferlineR.GoodmanP. (1951) Gestalt therapy: Excitement and growth in the human personality, New York, NY: Delta.
29.
ShearK.BoelenP.NeimeyerR. A. (2011) Treating complicated grief: Converging approaches. In: NeimeyerR. A.HarrisD. L.WinokuermH.ThorntonG. (eds) Grief and bereavement in contemporany society: Bridging research and practice, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 177–188.
30.
StroebeM.SchutH.StroebeW. (2006) Who benefits from disclosure? Exploration of attachment style differences in the effects of expressing emotions. Clinical Psychology Review26: 66–85.
31.
StroebeM. S.SchutH. (2001) Meaning making in the dual process model of coping with bereavement. In: NeimeyerR. A. (ed.) Meaning reconstruction and the experience of loss, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 55–73.
