BendixR.1962. Max Weber.Garden City, NJ: Doubleday.
2.
CahillS. E.1999. Emotional capital and professional socialization: The case of mortuary science students (and me). Social Psychology Quarterly62: 101–16
3.
DarrK.1987. Importance and relevance of the organizational philosophy. Hospital Topics, July/August, 9
4.
EricssonS.1993. The agony of grief. In Annual editions: Dying, death and grief, edited by DickinsonG. E.LemingM. R.MermanA. C.. Guilford, CT: Dushkin.
5.
FineG. A.1993. Ten lies of ethnography: Moral dilemmas of field research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography22: 267–94
6.
GerhardtU.1990. Qualitative research on chronic illness: The issue and the story. Social Science and Medicine30: 1149–59
7.
GerthH. H.MillsC. W.1958. From Max Weber: Essays in sociology.New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L.1965. Awareness of dying.Chicago: Aldine.
9.
GuessV. A.1984. Comparative medical systems: An anthropological perspective. In Advances in medical social science, edited by RuffiniJ. L., 147–85. New York: Gordon and Breach.
10.
HalpernS.AnspachR. R.1993. The study of medical institutions: Eliot Friedson's legacy. Work and Occupations20: 279–95
11.
HolmesT. H.RaheR. H.1967. The Social Readjustment Rating Scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research11: 213–18
12.
JametonA.1982. Nurses and moral distress in the hospital. In Value conflicts in health care delivery, edited by GruzalskiG.NelsonC., 131–49. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
13.
Kübler-RossE.1969. On death and dying.New York: Macmillan.
14.
LeeS. S.MartinL. E.1963. Medical care: Its social and organizational aspects. New England Journal of Medicine269: 343–47
15.
LutfeyK.MaynardD.1998. Bad news in oncology: How physician and patient talk about death and dying without using those words. Social Psychology Quarterly61: 321–41
16.
MartinT.DokaK. J.1996. Masculine grief. In Living with grief after sudden loss, by DokaK. J.. Washington: Hospice Foundation of America.
17.
MauserE.1996. The importance of organizational form: Parent perceptions versus reality in the day-care industry. In Private action and the public good, edited by PowellW. W.ClemensE.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18.
NieburgH. A.FischerA.1982. Pet loss: A thoughtful guide for adults and children.New York: Harper & Row.
19.
PerakylaA.1998. Authority and intersubjectivity: The delivery of diagnosis in primary health care. Social Psychology Quarterly61: 301–20
20.
QuinnJ. C.1984. Health care practice must reflect Catholic values. Hospital Progress, March, 8
21.
RobertsF. D.2000. The interactional construction of asymmetry: The medical agenda as a resource for delaying response to patient questions. The Sociological Quarterly41: 151–70
22.
RobillardA. B.1994. Communication problems in the intensive care unit. Qualitative Sociology17: 383–95
23.
SchlesingerM.1996. Measuring the consequences of ownership: External influences and the comparative performance of public, for-profit and private non-profit organizations. In Private action and the public good, edited by PowellW. W.ClemensE.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
24.
StarkweatherD. B.1964. Formality versus flexibility in complex organizations: A comparative investigation with a hospital. Ph.D. diss., Yale University, New Haven, CT
25.
StarkweatherD. B.1970. Hospital size, complexity and formalization. Health Services Research5: 330–41
26.
StarrP.1982. The social transformation of American medicine.New York: Basic Books.
27.
SunshineL.WrightJ. W.1987. The best hospitals in America.New York: Henry Holt.
28.
TonniesF.1957. Community and society (Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft). Translated by LoomisC. P.. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
29.
WeisbrodB. A.1996. Does institutional form matter? The meaning of the question, and some evidence. In Public action and the private good, edited by PowellW. W.ClemensE.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.