Course-based photovoice brings together high-impact educational practices and can serve as a mechanism to engage students with their surrounding environment through photography, narrative, and critical dialogue.
Purpose:
This article (a) considers how photovoice may serve as a pedagogical tool for fostering student engagement with place; and (b) explores students’ perspectives on campus green spaces and how engaging with these spaces through photovoice may have implications for sense of belonging.
Method:
Through photovoice, 26 undergraduates were invited to capture photos of campus green spaces and voice preferences, concerns, and potential improvements, culminating in a photo exhibition.
Findings:
Findings suggest that photovoice is a promising tool to allow multiple narratives about place to emerge. For example, student photo-narratives suggest that, in addition to more traditional spaces, informal, in-between green spaces hold meaning. Project outcomes include a change in student perspective (e.g., actively noticing campus nature) and feelings of empowerment (e.g., having a platform and audience). Overall, findings suggest course-based photovoice has the potential to encourage critical noticing, interpretation, and relation to place.
Implications:
The article concludes by critically reviewing limitations of course-based photovoice, providing recommendations for pedagogical practice, and considering how visual approaches may enrich place-based pedagogy.
AgarwalN.MoyaE. M.YasuiN. Y.SeymourC. (2015). Participatory action research with college students with disabilities: Photovoice for an inclusive campus. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 28(2), 243–250.
2.
AghabozorgiK.van der JagtA.BellS.SmithH. (2025). The role of university campus landscape characteristics in students’ mental health. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 111, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128863
3.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
CiolanL.ManasiaL. (2024). Picturing innovation in higher education: A photovoice study of innovative pedagogies. Active Learning in Higher Education, 27(1), 167–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874241245350
6.
CookK.QuigleyC. F. (2013). Connecting to our community: Utilizing photovoice as a pedagogical tool to connect college students to science. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 8(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2013.205a
7.
CooperC.SorensenW.YarbroughS. (2017). Visualising the health of communities: Using photovoice as a pedagogical tool in the college classroom. Health Education Journal, 76(4), 454–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0017896916688722
8.
Evans-AgnewR. A.RosembergM. A. (2016). Questioning photovoice research: Whose voice?Qualitative Health Research, 26(8), 1019–1030. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315624223
9.
FoellmerJ.KistemannT.AnthonjC. (2021). Academic greenspace and well-being—Can campus landscape be therapeutic? Evidence from a German university. Wellbeing, Space and Society, 2, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wss.2020.100003
10.
FountainB. S.HaleR.SpencerN.MorganJ.JamesL.StewartM. K. (2021). A 10-year systematic review of photovoice projects with youth in the United States. Health Promotion Practice, 22(6), 767–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399211019978
11.
GirangB. C.ChuD. P.EndrinalM. I.CanoyN. (2022). Spatializing psychological well-being: A photovoice approach on the experience of stress alleviation among university students. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 19(2), 539–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2019.1642199
12.
GopalanM.BradyS. T. (2020). College students’ sense of belonging: A national perspective. Educational Researcher, 49(2), 134–137. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19897622
13.
GruenewaldD.SmithG. A. (2010). Place-based education in the global age: Local diversity. Routledge.
14.
HaffejeeF. (2021). The use of photovoice to transform health science students into critical thinkers. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02656-1
15.
HoltE. W.LombardQ. K.BestN.Smiley-SmithS.QuinnJ. E. (2019). Active and passive use of green space, health, and well-being amongst university students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(3), 424. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030424
16.
KelleyM. J.PendrasM.MinnellaH. (2012). Sketching culture, sketching nature: Uncovering anchors of everyday nature for urban youth. Social and Cultural Geography, 13(8), 873–893. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2012.735690
17.
KuhG. D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U).
18.
Lefebvre, H. (1974/1991). The Production of Space. Translated by D. Nicholson-Smith. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
19.
Lomicka Anderson, L., Klimanova, L., Abdennebi, M., & Bain, L. (2025). Perceptions of place‐based pedagogies in language education through the lens of K‐16 teachers. Foreign Language Annals, 58, 889–915. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.70027
20.
ManaseriH.SustarsicM.MontanoR. L. T. (2025). Bridging research to practice: Transformative inclusive postsecondary training through a visual lens. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-03-2024-0143
21.
ManzoL. (2003). Beyond house and haven: Toward a revisioning of emotional relationships with places. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00074-9
22.
MarcusC. C. (1992). Environmental memories. In Place attachment (pp. 87–112). Springer US.
23.
MetcalfeA. S. (2016). Educational research and the sight of inquiry: Visual methodologies before visual methods. Research in Education, 96(1), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034523716664577
24.
MiglW.MathisH.SpencerM.HernandezR.MaddockJ. E. (2023). Undergraduate college students’ awareness and perception of nature-a photovoice study. BMC Public Health, 23(1), 2515–2523. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17455-0
MonteblancoA. D.MoyaE. M. (2021). Photovoice: Integrating course-based research in undergraduate and graduate social work education. The British Journal of Social Work, 51(2), 712–732. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa154
27.
MulrooneyH. M.KellyA. (2020). The university campus and a sense of belonging: What do students think?New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences, 15(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29311/ndtps.v0i15.3590
28.
NgC. G.TingS. Q.SaifiR. A.KamarulzamanA. B. (2024). Ethical issues in photovoice studies involving key populations: A scoping review. Asian Bioethics Review, 16(1), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-023-00297-7
29.
Oliván BlázquezB.Méndez-LópezF.León-HerreraS.Asensio-MartínezÁ.Magallón-BotayaR.García-UcedaE.Oliván-BláquezD.Sánchez-RecioR. (2025). Case-based learning and photovoice in relation to academic performance, satisfaction and self-efficacy in higher education: A cross-sectional study of related samples. Active Learning in Higher Education, 26(1), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874221148954
30.
PinkS. (2006). The future of visual anthropology: Engaging the senses. Routledge.
31.
Pipitone, J. M., & Jović, S. (2021). Urban green equity and COVID-19: Effects on park use and sense of belonging in New York City. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 65, 1–12.
32.
Pipitone, J. M., & Jović, S. (2022). Urban nature and sense of belonging: Photo-narrative exploration of socio-spatial disparities in New York City. Ecopsychology, 14(4), 235–252.
33.
RibeiroH.SantanaK. V. D. S.OliverS. L. (2024). Natural environments in university campuses and students’ well-being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21040413
34.
RichardsonM.HamlinI.ButlerC. W.ThomasR.HuntA. (2022). Actively noticing nature (not just time in nature) helps promote nature connectedness. Ecopsychology, 14(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2021.002
35.
ScheibelhoferP. (2007). His-stories of belonging: Young second-generation Turkish men in Austria. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 28(3), 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256860701429733
36.
SchellK.FergusonA.HamolineR.SheaJ.Thomas-MacleanR. (2009). Photovoice as a teaching tool: Learning by doing with visual methods. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21(3), 340–352.
37.
SeitzC. M.OrsiniM. M. (2022). Thirty years of implementing the photovoice method: Insights from a review of reviews. Health Promotion Practice, 23(2), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399211053878
38.
SeitzC. M.ReeseR. F.StrackR. W.FrantzS.WestB. (2014). Identifying and improving green spaces on a college campus: A photovoice study. Ecopsychology, 6(2), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2013.0103
39.
SpeakeJ.EdmondsonS.NawazH. (2013). Everyday encounters with nature: Students’ perceptions and use of university campus green spaces. Human Geographies, 7(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.5719/hgeo.2013.71.21
40.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Sage Publications.
41.
ThompsonC. A.PownallM.HarrisR.Blundell-BirtillP. (2023). Is the grass always greener? Access to campus green spaces can boost students’ sense of belonging. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24(8), 1841–1857. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-11-2022-0349
42.
TorreM. E.FineM. (2006). Participatory action research (PAR) by youth. In SherrodL. (Ed.), Youth activism: An international encyclopedia (pp. 456–462). Greenwood Publishing Group.
von SommoggyJ.RueterJ.CurbachJ.HeltenJ.TittlbachS.LossJ. (2020). How does the campus environment influence everyday physical activity? A photovoice study among students of two German universities. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.561175
45.
WangC. (2006). Youth participation in photovoice as a strategy for community change. Journal of Community Practice, 14(1/2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1300/J125v14n01_09
46.
WangC.BurrisM. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24(3), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819702400309
47.
WangC.Redwood-JonesY. A. (2001). Photovoice ethics: Perspectives from Flint photovoice. Health Education & Behavior, 28(5), 560–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019810102800504
48.
WassR.AndersonV.RabelloR.GoldingC.RangiA.EteuatiE. (2019). Photovoice as a research method for higher education research. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(4), 834–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1692791
49.
WattchowB.BrownM. (2011). A pedagogy of place: Outdoor education for a changing world. Monash University Publishing.
50.
WhyteW. H. (1980). The social life of small urban spaces. Conservation Foundation.
