Using Mobile Devices to Support Outdoor STEM Learning in Rural Contexts: An Embedded Mixed-Methods Study

Abstract

Background: Rural youth face barriers to involvement in effective Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) learning experiences, leading to persistent underrepresentation in STEM fields. Purpose: This study examined the feasibility of using mobile devices to engage rural youth in informal STEM learning (ISL) during free-choice, outdoor recreational activities. We assessed outcomes of a 10-month intervention related to STEM interest, identity, and future planning. Method: Fifty-four youth ages 12 to 17 completed monthly STEM challenges delivered via a mobile platform, aligned with connected learning and free-choice learning principles. Surveys measured pre/post changes in STEM supports, STEM confidence, and environmental concern; qualitative reflections explored meaning-making and identity shifts. Findings: Youth across sociodemographic groups reported quantitative gains in STEM supports, confidence, and environmental concern. Qualitative responses to reflection prompts indicated greater recognition of STEM in outdoor contexts and increased interest in STEM-related futures. Implications: ISL designs using mobile technology and grounded in inquiry, autonomy, and local relevance can foster meaningful STEM identity development in rural communities.

Keywords

Out of school time rural settings informal learning STEM education youth development

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexandre

Washington-Nortey

Chen

(2022). Informal STEM learning for young children: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health, 19(14), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148299

Allen

Kastelein

Mokros

Atkinson

Byrd

(2020). STEM Guides: Professional brokers in rural STEM ecosystems. International Journal of Science Education, 10(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2019.1700317

Zimmerman

H. T.

Weible

J. L.

(2017). Learning in and about rural places: Connections and tensions between students’ everyday experiences and environmental quality issues in their community. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 12(1), 7–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9757-1

Avery

L. M.

(2013). Rural science education: Valuing local knowledge. Theory Into Practice, 52(1), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2013.743769

Bang

Medin

D. L.

Atran

(2007). Cultural mosaics and mental models of nature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 104(35), 13868–13874. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706627104

Bastoni

Johnston

S. C.

Coppens

Seaman

Hartman

. (2024b). STEM pathways for rural youth: Experience sampling feedback and scoring manual. Faculty Publications #1905, University of New Hampshire, Durham NH, https://dx. https://doi.org/10.34051/p/2024.04

Bastoni

Seaman

Coppens

A. D.

Hartman

C. L.

(2024a). Universal design for learning: Strategies for engaging rural youth co-researchers with informal STEM learning. Connected Science Learning, 6(3), 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/24758779.2024.2349222

Belfield

C. R.

Brock

. (2023). How important are community colleges in promoting STEM? Teachers College Columbia University, Community College Research Center. https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/publications/how-important-community-colleges-promoting-stem.html

Boyce

C. J.

Mishra

Halverson

K. L.

Thomas

A. K.

(2014). Getting students outside: Using technology as a way to stimulate engagement. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(6), 815–826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9514-8

10.

Bundschuh

Johnson

. (2023). Retaining residents is important to New Hampshire’s future. Carsey School of Public Policy. https://carsey.unh.edu/publication/retaining-residents-important-new-hampshires-future

11.

Burks

Menezes

. (2018). What does asset-based STEM learning look like? Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE). https://informalscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/BP-3-Asset-Based-STEM.pdf

12.

Camoin Associates. (2023). State of New Hampshire workforce assessment executive report. Available at: https://www.nheconomy. com/getmedia/90db0638-52a5-4e4b-ba51fd06719d30df/Final-Workforce-Assessment-Stateof-New-Hampshire-v2.pdf

13.

Chaffee

Bjorklund Jr

Braverman

Gupta

Hammerness

Daly

A. J.

MacPherson

Adams

J. D.

Abouelkheir

Francis

Hinton

P.-S. L.

Lagodich

(2025). Finding peers “like me”: Student strategies for increasing belonging and flourishing in STEM. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 97, 101758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2025.101758

14.

Christensen

Knezek

. (2017). Relationship of middle school student STEM interest to career intent. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.275649

15.

Coleman

(1979). Experiential learning and information processing: Toward an appropriate mix. Journal of Experiential Education, 2(1), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382597900200102

16.

Confluence of States. (2018). Outdoor Recreation Industry Confluence Accords. Confluence of States. https://www.confluenceofstates.com/our-impact

17.

Creswell

J. W.

Plano Clark

V. L.

(2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.

18.

Dewey

(1899). The school and social progress. In McDermott

J. J.

(Ed.), The philosophy of John Dewey (pp. 454–467). University of Chicago Press.

19.

Dewey

(1900). Group IV. Historical development of inventions and occupations. In Boydston

J. A.

(Ed.), John dewey: The middle works, vol. 1, 1899-1901 (pp. 222–224). Southen Illinois University Press.

20.

Dewey

(1915/1990). The psychology of occupations. In Dewey

(Ed.), The child and the curriculum/the school and society (pp. 132–138). University of Chicago Press.

21.

Dewey

(1923). The school as a means of developing a social consciousness and social ideals in children. Journal of Social Forces, 1(5), 513–517. https://doi.org/10.2307/3005121

22.

Djonko-Moore

C. M.

Leonard

Holifield

Bailey

E. B.

Almughyirah

S. M.

(2018). Using culturally relevant experiential education to enhance urban children’s knowledge and engagement in science. Journal of Experiential Education, 41(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825917742164

23.

Dobbins

Barbour

Fuentes

Husbands Fealing

Lindquist

Martin

II . (2024). Making visible the invisible: STEM talent of rural America: 2024 CEOSE report to congress. National Science Foundation. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CMR-NS1-00188078

24.

Esteban-Guitart

Moll

L. C.

(2014). Funds of identity: A new concept based on the funds of knowledge approach. Culture & Psychology, 20(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X13515934

25.

Falk

J. H.

Dierking

L. D

(2019). Reimagining public science education: The role of lifelong free-choice learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0013-x

26.

Falk

J. H.

Heimlich

J. E.

Foutz

(2009). Free-choice learning and the environment. AltaMira Press.

27.

Fallace

T. D.

(2008). John Dewey and the savage mind: Uniting anthropological, psychological, and pedagogical thought, 1894-1902. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 44(4), 355–349. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.20328

28.

Fraser

Barnes

Kilpatrick

Guenther

Nutton

(2021). Considering young people’s dislocation from STEM education: Looking beyond the narrow focus of teaching and learning practice within school [conceptual analysis]. Frontiers in Education, 6, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.678613

29.

Guetterman

T. C.

Fetters

M. D.

Creswell

J. W.

(2015). Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint jisplays. Annals of Family Medicine, 13(6), 554–561. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1865

30.

Hartman

S. L.

Hines-Bergmeier

Klein

. (2017). Informal STEM learning: The state of research, access and equity in rural early childhood settings. Science Education and Civic Engagement, 9(2), 32–30. https://seceij.net/articletype/review/informal-stem-learning-the-state-of-research-access-and-equity-in-rural-early-childhood-settings/

31.

Hills

van Kraalingen

Thomas

G. J.

(2023). The impact of technology on presence in outdoor education. Journal of Experiential Education, 47(2), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/10538259231202452 (Original work published 2024)

32.

Hougham

R. J.

Nutter

Graham

(2018). Bridging natural and digital domains: Attitudes, confidence, and interest in using technology to learn outdoors. Journal of Experiential Education, 41(2), 154–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825917751203

33.

Ito

Gutiérrez

Livingstone

Penuel

Rhodes

Salen

Schor

Sefton-Green

Watkins

S. C.

(2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design . Digital Media and Connected Learning Hub. https://clalliance.org/publications/connected-learning-an-agenda-for-research-and-design

34.

James

J. J.

Robert

D. B.

Carin

E. V

. (2010). From play in nature, to recreation then vocation: A developmental model for natural history-oriented environmental professionals. Children, Youth and Environments, 20(1), 231–256. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.20.1.0231 https://doi.org/10.1353/cye.2010.0030

35.

Johnson

K. M

. (2025). Modest population gains widespread in New Hampshire counties. Carsey School of Public Policy. https://scholars.unh.edu/carsey/503

36.

Johnson

Majewska

. (2022). Formal, non-formal, and informal learning: What are they, and how can we research them? Cambridge University Press & Assessment Research Report. https://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/Images/665425-formal-non-formal-and-informal-learning-what-are-they-and-how-can-we-research-them-.pdf

37.

Kastelein

. (2019). The rural informal STEM conference. Maine Mathematics and Science Alliance. https://mmsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/RRC_Report_final_revised_Oct2019.pdf

38.

Kelly

Buckley

Lieberman

L. J.

Arndt

(2022). Universal design for learning: A framework for inclusion in outdoor learning. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 25(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-022-00096-z

39.

Kilty

T. J.

Burrows

A. C.

(2020). Systematic review of outdoor science learning activities with the integration of mobile devices. Mobile and Blended Learning, 12(2), 33–56. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.2020040103

40.

Kraft

(1990). Experiential learning. In Miles

Priest

(Eds.), Adventure education (pp. 181–186). Venture Publishing.

41.

Kumpulainen

Sefton-Green

. (2014). What is connected learning and how to research it? International Journal of Learning and Media, 4(2), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1162/IJLM_a_00091

42.

Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition. (2021). LCHC History. Laboratory of Contemporary Human Cognition. https://lchc.ucsd.edu/history/index.html

43.

Lakin

J. M.

Stambaugh

Ihrig

L. M.

Mahatmya

Assouline

S. G.

(2021/2022, December/January). Nurturing STEM talent in rural settings. Phi Delta Kappan, 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217211065823

44.

Lave

(1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge University Press.

45.

Ludwig

C. M.

Howsmon

R. A.

Stromholt

Valenzuela

J. J.

Calder

Baliga

N. S.

(2024). Consequential insights for advancing informal STEM learning and outcomes for students from historically marginalized communities. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 351. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02797-w

46.

Luria

A. R.

(1976). Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations. Harvard University Press.

47.

Mack

E. A.

Loveridge

Keene

Mann

(2023). A review of the literature about broadband internet connections and rural development (1995-2022). International Regional Science Review, 47(3), 231–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/01600176231202457

48.

Markus

Nurius

(1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954

49.

McLaughlin

D. K.

Schoff

C. M.

Demi

(2014). Influence of perceptions of current and future community on residential aspirations of rural youth. Rural Sociology, 79(4), 453–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12044

50.

Moore

J. X.

Anderson

L. N.

Benson

R. D.

Jr. Rychtarikova

A. G.

Williamson

L. D.

Wolf

L. E.

Whisenant

E. B.

Roark

Jones

S. R.

Ledford

C. J. W

. (2023). Toward equitable payment for inclusive participation. J Clin Transl Sci, 7(1), e58. https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.5

51.

Morgan

Smaldone

Selin

Deng

Holmes

(2022). Adding relevancy to STEM interest through adventure education: A mixed methods study. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(4), e2294. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12214

52.

Morris

B. J.

Owens

Ellenbogen

Erduran

Dunlosky

(2019). Measuring informal STEM learning supports across contexts and time. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0195-y

53.

Nasir

N. S.

Cooks

(2009). Becoming a hurdler: How learning settings afford identities. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 40(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1492.2009.01027.x

54.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2025). K-12 STEM education and workforce development in rural areas. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/28269

55.

National Research Council. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12190

56.

National Science Board. (2021). The STEM labor force of today: Scientists, engineers, and skilled technical workers. NSB-2021-2. Available at: https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20212/assets/nsb20212.pdf

57.

Ofek-Geva

(2025). Pathways to science: Factors shaping early adolescent science identity development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 97, 101756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2025.101756

58.

Outdoor Recreation Roundtable. (2023). Outdoor recreation at the state level. Available at: https://recreationroundtable.org/resources/state-recreation-data/

59.

Petrin

R. A.

Schafft

K. A.

Meece

J. L.

(2014). Educational sorting and residential aspirations among rural high school students: What are the contributions of schools and educators to rural brain drain? American Educational Research Journal, 51(2), 294–326. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214527493

60.

Pew Research Center. (2024). Demographics of mobile device ownership and adoption in the United States [Fact sheet]. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/

61.

Ramsurrun

Elaheebocus

Chiniah

(2024). Digital tools in informal science education sites: A systematic literature review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 33(4), 569–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10105-z

62.

Roberts

Jackson

Mohr-Schroeder

M. J.

Bush

S. B.

Maiorca

Cavalcanti

Craig Schroeder

Delaney

Putnam

Cremeans

(2018). Students’ perceptions of STEM learning after participating in a summer informal learning experience. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0133-4

63.

Rogoff

Callanan

Gutiérrez

Erickson

(2016). The organization of informal learning. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 356–401. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16680994

64.

Rogoff

Topping

Baker-Sennett

Lacasa

(2002). Mutual contributions of individuals, partners, and institutions: Planning to remember in girl scout cookie sales. Social Development, 11(2), 266–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00198

65.

Rose

Meyer

. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal Design for Learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. https://www.cast.org/products-services/resources/2002/universal-design-learning-udl-teaching-every-student-rose

66.

Saldaña

(2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th Ed.). Sage Publications.

67.

Saw

G. K.

Agger

C. A.

(2021). STEM pathways of rural and small-town students: Opportunities to learn, aspirations, preparation, and college enrollment. Educational Researcher, 50(9), 595–606. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211027528

68.

Saxe

G. B.

(1988). The mathematics of child street vendors. Child Development, 59(5), 1415–1425. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130503

69.

Schuck

Kearney

Burden

(2017). Exploring mobile learning in the third space. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(2), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1230555

70.

Scribner

(1984). Studying working intelligence. In Rogoff

Lave

(Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 9–40). Harvard University Press.

71.

Scribner

Cole

(1973). Cognitive consequences of formal and informal education. Science, 182(4112), 553–559. https:// doi.org/10.1126/science.182.4112

72.

Seaman

Coppens

A. D.

Hartman

C. L.

Bastoni

Moscouver

LaChaine

Gronneberg

(2024). Outdoor recreation shows promise as an equitable context for youth informal STEM learning in amenity-rich rural areas. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 48, 100815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2024.100815

73.

Seaman

McLaughlin

. (2014). The importance of outdoor activity and place attachment to adolescent development in Coös county, New Hampshire. University of New Hampshire Carsey Institute. Available at: http://scholars.unh.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1207&context=carsey

74.

Seaman

Sharp

E. H.

Tucker

C. J.

VanGundy

Rebellon

(2019). Outdoor activity involvement and postsecondary status among rural adolescents: Results from a longitudinal analysis. Journal of Leisure Research, 50(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2018.1544472

75.

Staus

N. L.

Falk

J. H.

Price

Tai

R. H.

Dierking

L. D.

(2021). Measuring the long-term effects of informal science education experiences: Challenges and potential solutions. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 3(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-021-00031-0

76.

Stay Work Play NH. (2023). New Hampshire quality of life survey. Stay Work Play NH. https://www.stayworkplay.org/survey

77.

STEM Ecosystems. (2021). What is a STEM Learning Ecosystem? STEM Ecosystems. https://stemecosystems.org/what-are-stem-ecosystems/

78.

Sullivan

. (2019). Aging and declining populations in northern New England: Is there a role for immigration? New England Public Policy Regional Brief #19-2. Boston Federal Reserve Bank. https://www.bostonfed.org/publications/new-england-public-policy-center-regional-briefs/2019/aging-and-declining-populations-in-northern-new-england.aspx

79.

The Association for Career and Technical Education. (2024). Maximizing access and success for special populations in CTE. The Association for Career and Technical Education. https://www.acteonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Intro_Maximizing_Access_Success_Special_Populations_ACTE_AdvanceCTE_Jan2024.pdf

80.

The Governor’s Task Force for the Recruitment and Retention of a Young Workforce for the State of New Hampshire. (2009). Final report .

81.

The Nature Conservancy. (2011). Connecting America's youth to nature. https://blog.nature.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/youth-and-nature-poll-results.pdf

82.

Tolan

. (2022). Outdoor recreation and economic diversification in resource-dependent communities. https://headwaterseconomics.org/wp-content/uploads/HE_2023_Outdoor-Recreation-Economic-Diversification-Resource-Dependent-Communities.pdf

83.

Turner

(2023). Hangar talk: A narrative exploration of place-based math and science methods for rural educators. In Yoho

L. M.

Moore

(Eds.), Expanding the vision of rurality in the US educational system (pp. 91–107). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-7437-2.ch005 .

84.

Ulrich-Schad

J. D.

Henly

Safford

(2013). The role of community assessments, place, and the great recession in the migration intentions of rural Americans. Rural Sociology, 78(3), 371–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12016

85.

United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. (2021). Rural classifications. United States Department of Agriculture. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/rural-economy-population/rural-classifications/

86.

U.S. Departments of Agriculture, Interior, and Commerce. (2024). Recommendations for regional economic development through sustainable forest products and outdoor recreation. U.S. Departments of Agriculture, Interior, and Commerce. https://primarynewssource.org/wp-content/uploads/economic-development-forest-communities.pdf

87.

Vadeboncouer

(2006). Engaging young people: Learning in informal contexts. Review of Research in Education, 30(1), 239–278. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X030001239

88.

van Kraalingen

(2023). A systematized review of the use of mobile technology in outdoor learning. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 23(3), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2021.1984963

89.

Wang

(2024). Career construction theory: Tools, interventions, and future trends. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1381233. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1381233

90.

Warner-Griffin

Liveoak

. (2023). Understanding flexible rural pathways. https://oese.ed.gov/files/2023/03/EIR_Rural-Career-Pathways.pdf

91.

Wertsch

J. V

. (1994). The primacy of mediated action in sociocultural studies. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1(4), 202–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039409524672

92.

World Population Review. (2024). Most rural states 2024. World Population Review. https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/most-rural-states

93.

Xia

Bentley

L. R.

Fan

Tai

R. H.

(2024). STEM outside of school: A meta-analysis of the effects of informal science education on students’ interests and attitudes for STEM. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 23(4), 1153–1181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10504-z