The use of structured reflections for promoting personal understanding and community self-efficacy was examined in 65 occupational therapy college students in a service learning course. Students in the experimental group wrote structured reflections throughout the semester while students in the control groups used non-structured reflections. Outcome measures included quantitative tests of personal understanding and community self-efficacy (Personal Growth Initiative Scale, New General Self-Efficacy Scale, and the Community Self-Efficacy Scale) and a qualitative narrative. Results indicated that students who wrote structured reflections significantly increased in personal growth and personal self-efficacy, whereas those using non-structured reflections showed no change. Both groups improved in community self-efficacy scores with no significant difference between groups.
AmersonR. (2010). The impact of service-learning on cultural competence. Nursing Education Perspectives, 31(1), 18-22.
2.
AshS. L.ClaytonP. H. (2004). The articulated learning: An approach to guided reflection and assessment. Innovative Higher Education, 29, 137-154.
3.
AshS. L.ClaytonP. H.AtkinsonM. P. (2005). Integrating reflection and assessment to capture and improve student learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service-Learning, 11(2), 49-60.
4.
AshS. L.ClaytonP. H.DayM. G. (2005). Learning through reflection: A tutorial for reflection in service-learning. Raleigh: North Carolina State Service-Learning Program.
5.
BanduraA. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BatchelderT.RootS. (1994). Effects of an undergraduate program to integrate academic learning and service: Cognitive, prosocial cognitive, and identity outcomes. Journal of Adolescence, 17, 341-355.
7.
BoudD. (2001). Using journal writing to enhance reflective practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 90, 9-18.
8.
BringleR. G.PhillipsM. A.HudsonM. (2004). The measure of service learning: Research scales to assess student experiences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
9.
CelioC. I.DurlakJ.DymnickiA. (2011). A Meta-analysis of the impact of service-learning on students. Journal of Experiential Education, 34, 164-181.
10.
ChenG.GullyS. M.EdenD. (2001). Validation of a new General Self-Efficacy Scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 62-83.
11.
ConwayJ. M.AmelE. L.GerwienD. P. (2009). Teaching and learning in the social context: A meta-analysis of service learning’s effects on academic, personal, social, and citizenship outcomes. Teaching of Psychology, 36, 233-245.
12.
CreswellJ. W.ClarkV. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
13.
DeweyJ. (1910). How we think. New York, NY: D. C. Heath.
14.
EylerJ. (2002). Reflection: Linking service and learning—Linking students and communities. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 517-534.
15.
EylerJ. S.GilesD. E. (1999). Where’s the learning in service-learning?San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
16.
FeltenP.GilchristL. Z.DarbyA. (2006). Emotion and learning: Feeling our way toward a new theory of reflection in service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning Spring, 12(2), 38-46.
17.
HatcherJ. A.BringleR. G.MuthiahR. (2004). Designing effective reflection: What matters to service-learning?Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 11(1), 38-46.
18.
HattonN.SmithD. (1995). Reflection in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33-49.
19.
HsiehH. F.ShannonS. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15 (9), 1277-1288.
20.
HubbsD.BrandC. F. (2010). Learning from the inside out: A method for analyzing reflective journal in the college classroom. Journal of Experiential Education, 33, 56-71.
21.
HubbsD.BrandC. F. (2007). Survey of the use of reflective journals in counselor education. Virginia Counselors Association Journal, 29, 57-60.
22.
KarasikR. J. (2013). Reflecting on reflection: Capitalizing on the learning in intergenerational service-learning. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education, 34, 78-98.
23.
KolbD. (1984). Experiential learning as the science of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24.
KuhG. D. (2005). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
25.
MabryJ. B. (1998). Pedagogical variations in service-learning and student outcomes: How time, contact, and reflection matter. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 5(1), 32-47.
26.
MeyersS. A. (2009). Service learning as an opportunity for personal and social transformation. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21, 373-381.
27.
MezirowJ. (Ed.). (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in Progress. The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
28.
MoleeL. M.HenryM. E.SessaV. I.McKinney-PrupisE. R. (2010). Assessing learning in service-learning courses through critical reflection. Journal of Experiential Education, 33, 239-257.
29.
NowakowskiK.KaufmanR.PelletierD. D. (2014). Clinical service learning program promotes mastery of essential competencies geriatric physical therapy. Journal of Physical Therapy Education, 28(2), 46-53.
30.
QuezadaR. L.ChristophersonR. W. (2005). Adventure-based service learning: University students’ self-reflection accounts of service with children. Journal of Experiential Education, 28, 1-16.
31.
ReebR. N.KatsuyamaR. M.SammonJ. A.YoderD. S. (1998). The Community Self-Efficacy Scale: Evidence of reliability, construct validity, and pragmatic utility. The Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 5, 48-57.
32.
RobitschekC. (1998). Personal growth initiative: The construct and its measure. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 30, 183-198.
33.
RobitschekC.KeyesC. L. M. (2009). Keyes’s model of mental health with personal growth initiative as a parsimonious predictor. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 321-329.
34.
YorioP.YeF. (2012). A Meta-analysis on the effects of service-learning on the social, personal, and cognitive outcomes of learning. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11, 9-27.
