ApterM. J. (1982). The experience of motivation: The theory of psychological reversals. London: Academic Press.
2.
ApterM. J. (Ed.). (2001). Motivational styles in everyday life: A guide to Reversal Theory. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
3.
BrodyE. B.HatfieldB. D.SpaldingT. W. (1988). Generalization of self-efficacy to a continuum of stressors upon mastery of a high-risk sport skill. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10, 32–44.
4.
CreswellJ. W. (2002). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L.GutmannM. L.HansonW. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209–240). Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage.
6.
CreyerE.RossW.EversD. (2003). Risky recreation: An exploration of factors influencing the likelihood of participation and the effects of experience. Leisure Studies, 22(3), 239–253.
7.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
8.
CsikszentmihalyiM.RathundeK. R.WhalenS. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
EwertA.HollenhorstS. (1989). Testing the adventure model: Empirical support for a model of risk recreation participation. Journal of Leisure Research, 21(2), 124–139.
10.
FreyK. P. (1999). Reversal Theory: Basic concepts. In KerrJ. H. (Ed.), Experiencing sport: Reversal Theory (pp. 3–17). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
11.
JacksonS. A.CsikszentmihalyiM. (1999). Flow in sports. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
12.
JonesC.HollenhorstS.PernaF. (2003). An empirical comparison of the Four Channel Flow Model and Adventure Experience Paradigm. Leisure Sciences, 25(1), 17–31.
13.
JonesC.HollenhorstS.PernaF.SelinS. (2000). Validation of the Flow Theory in an on-site whitewater kayaking setting. Journal of Leisure Research, 32(2), 247–261.
14.
KerrJ. H. (1989). Anxiety, arousal, and sport performance: An application of Reversal Theory. In HackfortD.SpielbergerC. D. (Eds.), Anxiety in sports: An international perspective (pp. 137–151). New York: Hemisphere.
15.
MalesJ. (1999). Individual experience in slalom canoeing. In KerrJ. H. (Ed.), Experiencing sport: Reversal Theory (pp. 101–128). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
16.
MalesJ.KerrJ. H. (1996). Stress, emotion, and performance in elite slalom canoeists. The Sport Psychologist, 10, 17–36.
17.
MartinA. J.JacksonS. A. (2008). Brief approaches to assessing task absorption and enhanced subjective experience: Examining ‘short’ and ‘core’ flow in diverse performance domains. Motivation and Emotion, 32(3), 141–157.
18.
NakamuraJ.CsikszentmihalyiM. (2005). The concept of flow. In SnyderC. R.LopezS. J. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 89–105). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
19.
O'ConnellK. A.CalhounJ. E. (2001). The Telic/Paratelic State Instrument (T/PSI): Validating a Reversal Theory measure. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(2), 193–204.
20.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
21.
PotockyM.MurgatroydS. (1993). What is Reversal Theory? In KerrJ. H.MurgatroydS. J.ApterM. J. (Eds.), Advances in Reversal Theory (pp. 13–26). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
22.
PriestS.BuntingC. (1993). Changes in perceived risk and competence during whitewater canoeing. Journal of Applied Recreation Research, 18(4), 265–280.
23.
ReaD. (1993). Reversal Theory explanations of optimal experience. In KerrJ. H.MurgatroydS. J.ApterM. J. (Eds.), Advances in Reversal Theory (pp. 75–88). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
24.
ScanlanT. K.RussellD. G.WilsonN. C.ScanlanL. A. (2003). Project on elite athlete commitment (PEAK): I. Introduction and methodology. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 25(3), 360–376.
25.
StavrouN. A.JacksonS. A.ZervasY.KarterliotisK. (2007). Flow experience and athletes' performance with reference to the orthogonal model of flow. The Sport Psychologist, 21(4), 438–457.