Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper uses autoethnography to reassess the concept “experience” and the lack of theoretical frameworks within experiential education for delimiting experience within the practices and research around experiential, adventure, and outdoor education. Although a pivotal and essential part of practice, theoretical understandings of experience have been missing in experiential education scholarship. Experience is clearly a complex, constructed “reality.” Jagger (cited in Lauritzen, 1997, p. 83) has pointed out that an appeal to experience is “fraught with methodological difficulties.” What exactly is experience? Whose experience is heard? Like other disciplines, for example the studies of religions and psychology, experiential education has no rigorous definitions, characterizations, typologies, or conceptualizations of the focus of its study and practice—a type of experience. Drawing upon critiques from Indigenous, feminist, postcolonial, and black Americans and Canadians, and integrating with an autoethnographic approach, this paper provides a critique of the existing use of “experience” and sketches an initial approach for developing theoretical understandings of the central phenomenon of experiential, adventure, and outdoor education.

Keywords

Critical Theory Autoethnography Experience

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Austin

J. H.

(1998). Zen and the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Bly

(1996). Changing the bully who rules the world: Reading & thinking about ethics. Minneapolis: Milkweed Editions.

Butler

(1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.

Butler

Scott

J. W.

(Eds.). (1992). Feminists theorize the political. New York: Routledge.

Cook-Lynn

(1996). Why I can't read Wallace Stegner, and other essays. A tribal voice. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Craps

Dewulf

Mancero

Santos

Bouwen

(2004). Constructing common ground and re-creating differences between professional and indigenous communities in the Andes. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 14(6), 378–393.

Davis

Sumara

Luce-Kapler

(2000). Engaging minds: Learning and teaching in a complex world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Doidge

(2007). The brain that changes itself. New York: Penguin Books.

Doniger

(1999). The implied spider. New York: Columbia University Press.

10.

Freire

(2005). Education for critical consciousness. New York: Continuum International.

11.

Freire

Bergman

R. M.

(2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum International.

12.

Gordon

R. G.

(2005). Ethnologue: Languages of the World. Dallas, TX: International Academic Bookstore.

13.

Gordon

L. R.

Gordon

J. A.

(2005). Not only the master's tools: African American studies in theory and practice. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.

14.

Ingold

(2000). The perception of the environment: Essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.

15.

Langer

E. J.

(2006). On becoming an artist. New York: Ballantine Books.

16.

Lauritzen

(1997). Hear no evil, see no evil, think no evil: Ethics and the appeal to experience. Hypatia, 12(2), 83–105.

17.

M. Z.

Horner

(1998). The problematic of experience: Redefining critical work in ethnography and pedagogy. College English, 60(3), 257–277.

18.

Macedo

Goleman

(1995). Working theory: Critical composition studies for students and teachers. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey, xiii–xix.

19.

Madison

D. S.

(1999). Performing theory/embodied writing. Text and performance quarterly, 19, 107–124.

20.

Narayan

(1997). Dislocating cultures: Identities, traditions and Third World feminism. New York: Routledge.

21.

Neuman

(1996). Collecting ourselves at the end of the century. In Ellis

Bochner

(Eds.), Composing ethnography: Alternative forms of qualitative writing. London: Alta Mira Press.

22.

Probyn

(1993). Sexing the self: Gendered position in cultural studies. New York: Routledge.

23.

Scott

(1992). ‘Experience.’. In Butler

Scott

J. W.

(Eds.). Feminist theorize the political (pp. 22–40). New York: Routledge.

24.

Sharifan

(2005). Cultural conceptualisations in English words: A study of Aboriginal children in Perth. Language & Education, 19(1), 74–88.

25.

Siegel

D. J.

(2007). The mindful brain: Reflection and attunement in the cultivation of well-being. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

26.

Smith

J. Z.

(2004). Relating religion; Essays in the study of religion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

27.

Smith

J. Z.

(1990). Drudgery divine: On the comparison of early Christianities and the religions of late Antiguity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

28.

Warren

K. J.

(2000). Ecofeminist philosophy: A western perspective on what it is and why it matters. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

29.

Wolfe

B. D.

Samdahl

D. M.

(2005). Challenging assumptions: Examining fundamental beliefs that shape challenge course programming and research. Journal of Experiential Education, 28(1), 25–43.

Rethinking Experience: What Do We Mean by This Word “Experience”?

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References