In this study, we offer insights regarding the tactics used by institutions to implement and sustain service-learning at various levels of commitment as identified by Holland (1997). An analysis of data collected from 12 directors of service-learning centers provides a description of common practices associated with implementing and sustaining service-learning initiatives at the institutional level, focusing on organizational tactics associated with funding, administration, faculty recruitment and support, and student involvement and assessment.
AstinA. W.VogelgesangL. J.IkedaE. K.YeeJ. A. (2000). How service-learning affects students. Report by the Higher Education Research Institute University of California, Los Angeles
2.
BringleR. G.HatcherJ. A. (1996). Implementing service-learning in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 67(2), 221–239
3.
BringleR. G.HatcherJ. A. (2000). Institutionalization of service-learning in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(3), 273–290
4.
CheckowayB. (2001) Reviewing the civic mission of the American research university. The Journal of Higher Education, 72(2), 125–147
5.
GilesD. W.EylerJ. (1994). The impact of a college community service laboratory on students' personal, social and cognitive outcomes. Journal of Adolescence, 17, 327–339
6.
GodfreyP. C. (1999). Service-learning and management education: A call to action. Journal of Management Inquiry, 8(4), 363–378
7.
GodfreyP. C. (2000). A moral argument for service-learning in management education. In GodfreyP.GrassoE., Working for the common good: Concepts and models for service-learning in management (pp. 21–42). Washington, D.C.: American Association for Higher Education
8.
GrayM. J.OndaatjeE. H.ZakarasL. (1999). Combining service and learning in higher education. Rand Education
9.
GujarathiM. R.McQuadeR. J. (2002). Service-learning in business schools: A case study in an intermediate accounting course. Journal of Education for Business, January/February, 144–150
10.
HollandB. (1997). Analyzing institutional commitment to service: A model of key organizational factors. Michigan Journal of Community Service-Learning, 4, 30–39
11.
JacobyB. (1996). Service-learning in higher education: Concepts and practices. San Francisco: Jossey Bass
12.
KreitnerR.KinickiA. (2004). Organizational behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill
13.
LeeT. W. (1999). Using qualitative methods in organizational research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
14.
MarkusG. B.HowardJ. P. F.KingD. C. (1993). Integrating community service and classroom instruction enhances learning: Results from an experiment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(54), 410–419
15.
McCarthyA. M.TuckerM. L. (1999). Student attitudes toward service-learning: Implications for implementation. Journal of Management Education, 23(5), 554–573
16.
MortonK.TroppeM. (1996). From the margin to the mainstream: Campus Compact's project on integrating service with academic study. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 21–32
17.
RobinsonG.BarnettL. (1998). Best practices in service-learning: Building a national community college network, 1994–1997. American Association of Community Colleges, Corporation for National Service, Washington, DC
18.
RothmanM. (ed.) (1998). Service matters: Engaging higher education in the renewal of Americas communities and American democracy. Providence, R.I.: Campus Compact
19.
WoodR. J. (1990). Changing the Educational Program. In Managing change in higher education. SteeplesD. W. (ed.) (pp. 51–58). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
