The purpose of this study was to examine the outcomes of using metaphors to enhance learning in the framing and debriefing of teamwork issues for a corporate adventure training (CAT) program. Through random assignment, four different but intact regional work groups from a European banking institution participated in a CAT program for the purposes of team-building. A fifth randomly selected intact work group from another region in Europe served as a control group. Each group received the same CAT program, but the groups were provided with different forms of facilitative metaphors in their program. All groups were measured for changes in teamwork during an initial development period, as well as during two follow-up periods to determine the maintenance of potential changes. The mixed isomorphic framing/metaphoric debriefing approach proved to be the most effective training methodology for initially developing, as well as maintaining, teamwork in the CAT training program.
BaconS. B. (1983). The conscious use of metaphor in Outward Bound. Denver, CO: Colorado Outward Bound.
2.
BaconS. B. (1987). The evolution of the Outward Bound process. Greenwich, CT: Outward Bound, USA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 295780).
3.
BocherB., MillerD., & SimpsonS. (2005). A continuum of processing techniques. In CainJ., CummingsM., & StanchfieldJ. (Eds.), A teachable moment: A facilitator's guide to activities for processing, debriefing, reviewing, and reflection (p. 7). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
4.
BoyleI. T. (2000). The effects of facilitation styles with adventure programming with Year 9 males on locus of control measures. Kangaroo Valley, NSW, Australia: Glengarry Centre.
5.
BoyleI. T. (2002). The impact of adventure-based training on team cohesion and psychological skills development in elite sporting teams. USA: Dissertation.com. www.Dissertation.com/library/1121938a.htm.
6.
BramwellK.ForresterS.HouleB.LaRocqueJ.VilleneuveL.PriestS. (1997). One shot wonders don't work: A causal-comparative study. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Leadership, 14(2), 12–17.
7.
BronsonJ. (1991). Team Development Indicator. Mountain View, CA: Performance Dynamics Group.
8.
BronsonJ.GibsonS.KisharR.PriestS. (1992). Evaluation of Team Development in a Corporate Adventure Training Program. Journal of Experiential Education, 15(2), 50–53.
9.
DohertyK. (1995). A quantitative analysis of three teaching styles. Journal of Experiential Education, 18(1), 12–19.
10.
DonnisonP. (2000). Images of outdoor management developments synthesis of the literature and participants' experiences on outdoor courses. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Lancaster, England.
11.
DonnisonP. (2002). Images of outdoor management development: A synthesis of the literature and participants' experiences on outdoor courses. Retrieved March 26, 2006 from http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/research/
12.
GassM. A. (1985). Programming the transfer of learning in adventure education. Journal of Experiential Education, 8(3), 18–24.
13.
GassM. A. (1991). Enhancing metaphoric transfer in adventure therapy programs. Journal of Experiential Education, 14(2), 6–13.
14.
GassM. A. (1997). Facilitation: A co-creation of client experience. Journal of Experiential Education, 20(2), 67–68.
15.
GassM. A. (2005). Comprehending the value structures influencing significance and power behind experiential education research. Journal of Experiential Education, 27(3), 286–296.
16.
GassM. A.GillisH. L. (1995). Constructing solutions in adventure therapy. Journal of Experiential Education, 18(2), 63–69.
17.
GassM.GoldmanG.PriestS. (1992). Constructing effective corporate adventure training programs. Journal of Experiential Education, 15(1), 35–42.
18.
GillisH. L. (1986). An exploratory study comparing the strategic use of metaphorical introductions with traditional introductions in a one-day adventure workshop for couples enrichment (unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Georgia). Dissertation Abstracts International, 47/09-A, 3312.
19.
HirschJ.GillisH. L. (2004). Developing metaphors for group activities [Produced at Georgia College and State University, Milledgeville, GA]. [DVD]. Boulder, CO: Association for Experiential Education.
20.
HovelynckJ. (1998). Facilitating experiential learning as a process of metaphor development. Journal of Experiential Education. 21(1), 6–13.
21.
HovelynckJ. (2003). Moving active learning forward. Journal of Experiential Education, 26(1), 1–7.
22.
ItinC. (1995). Utilizing hypnotic language in adventure therapy. Journal of Experiential Education, 18(2), 70–75.
23.
KirkpatrickD. (1998). Evaluating training programs (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Berett-Koehler.
24.
KlintK.PriestS. (2004). Team development from a corporate adventure training program and barriers to workplace transference. Retrieved March 26, 2006, from http://www.tarrak.com/FREE/res.htm.
25.
KormanskiC. L.MozenterA. (1987). A new model of team building: A technology for today and tomorrow. In PfeifferJ. W. (Ed.) The 1987 Annual: Developing human resources. San Diego, CA: University Associates.
26.
LitteriniV. (2001). An examination of perceived supervisory change to production rate, product rejection rate, and delivery efficiency. Unpublished master's thesis. University of New Hampshire.
27.
LucknerJ. L.NadlerR. S. (1997). Processing the experience: Strategies to enhance and generalize learning. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
28.
MackH. (1996). Inside work, outdoors: Women, metaphor, and meaning. In WarrenK. (Ed.). Women's voices in experiential education. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
29.
MacReaS.MooreC.SavageG.SoehnerD.PriestS. (1993). Changes in risk-taking propensity due to ropes course challenges. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Leadership, 10(2), 10–12.
30.
PinkhardJ. (1996). Mapping out the territory: Beyond isomorphs and metaphors in adventure-based programmes. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Leadership, 13(1), 11–14.
31.
PriestS. (1996). A research summary for corporate adventure training (CAT) and experience-based training and development (EBTD). Coalition for Education in the Outdoors Research Symposium Proceedings. Bradford Woods, Indiana (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 413127).
32.
PriestS. (1998). Physical challenge and the development of trust through corporate adventure training. Journal of Experiential Education, 21(1), 31–34.
33.
PriestS.GassM. A. (1993). Five generations of facilitated learning from adventure experiences. Journal of Adventure Education, 10 (3), 23–25.
34.
PriestS.GassM. A. (1997). An examination of “problem solving” versus “solution oriented” facilitation styles in a corporate setting. Journal of Experiential Education, 20 (1), 34–39.
35.
PriestS.GassM. A. (2005). Effective leadership in adventure programming. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
36.
PriestS.GassM. A.FitzpatrickK. (1999). Training corporate managers to facilitate: The next generation of facilitating experiential methodologies?Journal of Experiential Education, 22(1), 50–53.
37.
PriestS.LesperanceM. A. (1994). Time series trend analysis in corporate team development. Journal of Experiential Education, 17(1), 34–39.
38.
RobertsA. R., & YeagerK. R. (Eds.). (2004). Evidence-based practice manual: Research and outcome measures in health and human services. New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
RohnkeK. (1989). Cowstails and Cobras II. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt.
SchoelJ.MaizellR. S. (2002). Exploring islands of healing: New perspectives on adventure-based counseling. Beverly, MA: Project Adventure.
42.
SmithR. P.PriestS. (2004). Team development from a corporate adventure training program and barriers to workplace transference. Retrieved March 26, 2006 from http://www.tarrak.com/FREE/res.htm.
43.
ZeigJ. K. (1994). Ericksonian methods: The essence of the story. New York: Bruner/Mazel.
