BobilyaA. J., KalischK. R., & McAvoyL. H. (2004, January). An investigation of the solo in a wilderness experience program. Paper presented at the Coalition for Education in the Outdoors Research Symposium, Martinsville, IN.
2.
CreswellJ. W. (1994) Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
DanielR. B. (2003) The life significance of a spiritually oriented Outward Bound-type wilderness expedition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Antioch New England Graduate School.
4.
EstesC. A. (1994). Outward bound: The congruence of principles and practice. In McAvoyL. H., StringerL. A., & EwertA. (Eds.), Coalition for Education in the Outdoors Second Research Symposium Proceedings (pp. 22–32). Cortland, NY: Coalition for Education in the Outdoors.
5.
EwertA., & McAvoyL. (2000). The effects of wilderness settings on organized groups: A state of knowledge paper. In McCoolS. F., ColeD. N., BorrieW. T., & O'LoughlinJ. (Eds.), Wilderness Science in a Time of Change Conference: Vol. 3, Wilderness as a place for scientific inquiry (pp. 13–25). Ogdon, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture.
6.
GlasserB. G., & StraussA. L. (1967) The discovery of grounded theory strategy for qualitative research.Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
7.
GriffinW. J. (2000) Effects of an adventure-based program with an explicit spiritual component on the spiritual growth of adolescents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New Mexico.
8.
HendeeJ. C., & BrownM. (1988). How wilderness experience programs facilitate personal growth: A guide for program leaders and resource managers.Renewable Resources Journal, 6(2), 9–16.
9.
KalischK. R. (1999) The role of the instructor in the Outward Bound educational process.Kearney, NE: Morris.
10.
LincolnY. S., & GubaE. G. (1985) Naturalistic inquiry.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
11.
LincolnY. S., & GubaE. G. (1994). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. In StarkJ. S., & ThomasA. (Eds.), Assessment and program evaluation.New York: Simon & Schuster.
12.
McAvoyL. (2000). Components of the outdoor trip: A response to the papers. In StringerL.A., McAvoyL. H., & YoungA. B. (Eds.), Coalition for Education in the Outdoors Fifth Biennial Research Symposium Proceedings (pp. 12–14). Cortland, NY: Coalition for Education in the Outdoors.
13.
McFeeM. (1993) The effect of group dynamics on the perception of positive learning experience in the outward bound process. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Forest Institute of Professional Psychology, Wheeling, IL.
14.
McKenzieM. (2003). Beyond the “Outward Bound Process: ” Rethinking student learning.Journal of Experiential Education, 26(1), 8–23.
15.
McKenzieM. D. (2000). How are adventure education program outcomes achieved? A review of the literature.Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 5(1), 19–28.
16.
PattenM. L. (2001) Questionnaire research: A practical guide.Los Angeles: Pyrczak.
17.
PattonM. Q. (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
SibthorpJ. (2000). Components of an outdoor trip: What really happens? Study 1. In StringerL. A., McAvoyL. H., & YoungA. B. (Eds.), Coalition for Education in the Outdoors Fifth Biennial Research Symposium Proceedings (pp. 2–6). Cortland, NY: Coalition for Education in the Outdoors.