Human service interns completing their four-year Bachelor of Science degree at the University of Tennessee participated in this study which focused on investigating student internship experiences from the perspective of three different internship stage models. The three models studied include those of Inkster and Ross (1998), Sweitzer and King (1999), and Kiser (2000). Findings provided insight as to students' levels of internship satisfaction and dissatisfaction during the internship. Data collected suggest each model has unique strengths and limitations. Recommendations are offered as to the effective use of each model. An eclectic use of the three models in pedagogy is supported
HenryJ. S.RehwaldtS. S.VineyardG. M. (2001). Congruency between student interns and worksite supervisors regarding critical elements of an internship experience. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19(1), 31–42.
2.
HuckS. W. (2000). Reading statistics and research (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.
3.
InksterR.RossR. (1998). Monitoring and supervising the internship. National Society for Experiential Education Quarterly, 23(4), 10–11, 23–26.
4.
KersonT. (1994). Field instruction in social work settings: A framework for teaching. New York: Haworth Press.
5.
KingM. A.TowerC. C. (1993). Placement across the miles. Human Service Education, 13(1), 35–43.
6.
KiserP. (2000). Getting the most from your human service internship: Learning from experience. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
7.
LacoursiereR. (1980). The life cycle of groups: Group developmental stage theory. New York: Human Sciences.
8.
LambD.BarkerJ.JenningsM.YarrisE. (1982). Passages of an internship in professional psychology. Professional Psychology, 13(5), 61–69.
9.
McClamT. (1996). Results of follow-up study of graduates—1996: Human serviceeducation. Knoxville, TN: The University of Tennessee, Human Service Education Program.
10.
McClamT. (2000). Results of follow-up study of graduates—2000: Human service education. Knoxville, TN: The University of Tennessee, Human Service Education Program.
11.
McClamT.PuckettK. (1991). Qualities of effective supervision: Changes in novices' perceptions. Human Service Education, 12(1), 13–23.
12.
McClamT.SzczepanikP. (1989). Profiled human service majors' ideas about supervisors. Human Service Education, 11(1), 23–29.
13.
NesbittS. (1993). The field experience: Identifying false assumptions. The LINK (Newsletter of the National Organization for Human Service Education), 14(3), 3–5.
14.
SlickG. (1995). The field experience: Creating successful programs for new teachers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
15.
SweitzerH. F.JonesJ. S. (1990). Self-understanding in human service education: Goals and methods. Human Service Education, 10(1), 39–52.
16.
SweitzerH. F.KingM. A. (1994). Stages of an internship: An organizing framework. Human Service Education, 14(1), 25–38.
17.
SweitzerH. F.KingM. A. (1995). The internship seminar: A developmental approach. National Society for Experiential Education Quarterly, 21(1), 22–25.
18.
SweitzerH. F.KingM. A. (1999). The successful internship: Transformation and empowerment. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
19.
UzanS. L. (1992). Field placement in human services programs: An exploratory survey. Human Service Education, 11(1), 31–33.
20.
ZunzS. J. (1998). Resiliency and burnout: Protective factors for human service managers. Administration in Social Work, 22(3), 39–54.
