This article summarizes evidence from meta-analyses of outdoor education, psychotherapy, and education which can he used to help determine the relative efficacy of adventure therapy programs. The major outdoor education meta-analysis by Hattie, Marsh, Neill, and Richards (1997) cites an effect size of .34 for immediate program effectiveness. Meta-analytic studies of innovative education programs in school settings report similar effects (Hattie et al., Hattie, 1992, 1993), while psychological training meta-analyses report slightly higher effects (Lipsey & Wilson, 1993), and meta-analyses of psychotherapy effectiveness find stronger effects (Casey St Berman, 1985; Smith, Glass, & Miller, 1980). This article derives outcome benchmarks for adventure therapy program outcomes taken from existing outdoor education, psychological, and educational meta-analyses, and recommends that the benchmarks be used in adventure therapy research and evaluation to allow for more accurate assessments of program's effectiveness. The suggested benchmarks should be used only as guides, and should be refined in future by meta-analyses of adventure therapy outcomes.
BuntingC. J.DonleyJ. P. (2002, January). Ten years of challenge course research: A review of affective outcome studies. Poster session presented at the 6th Coalition for the Education in the Outdoors Research Symposium, Bradford Woods, IN.
2.
CaseyR. J.BermanJ. S. (1985). The outcome of psychotherapy with children. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 388–400.
3.
CasonD.GillisH. L. (1994). A meta-analysis of outdoor adventure programming with adolescents. Journal of Experiential Education, 17(1), 40–47.
4.
CohenJ. (1977). Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences (revised ed.). New York: Academic Press.
5.
Davis-BermanJ.BermanD. S. (1994). Wilderness therapy: Foundations, theory and research. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
6.
EwertA.SibthorpJ. (2001). Multivariate analysis in experiential education: Exploring the possibilities. Journal of Adventure Education, 23, 108–117.
7.
EysenckH. J. (1961). The effects of psychotherapy. In EysenckH. J. (Ed.), Handbook of abnormal psychology (pp. 697–725). New York: Basic.
8.
EysenckH. J. (1985). The battle over psychotherapeutic effects. In HarrimanJ. (Ed.), Does psychotherapy really help people? (pp. 52–61). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
9.
GassM. A. (Ed.). (1993). Adventure therapy: Therapeutic applications of adventure programming. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
10.
GillisH. L. (1992, January). Therapeutic uses of adventure-challenge-outdoor-wilderness: Theory and research. Paper presented at the Coalition for Education in the Outdoors Symposium, Bradford Woods, Indiana University, Martinsville, IN.
11.
GillisH. L. (2000, March). Going around in circles: Research and program evaluation in therapeutic adventure and adventure therapy. Paper presented to the Second International Adventure Therapy Conference, Augsburg, Germany.
12.
GillisH. L.ThomsenD. (1996, January). A research update (1992-1995) of adventure therapy: Challenge activities and ropes courses, wilderness expeditions, and residential camping programs. Paper presented at the Coalition for Education in the Outdoors Symposium, Bradford Woods, Indiana University, Martinsville, IN.
13.
GlassG. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3–8.
14.
GlassG. V. (1977). Integrating findings: The meta-analysis of research. Review of Research in Education, 5, 351–379.
15.
HansT. (1997). A meta-analysis of the effects of adventure programming on locus of control. Unpublished master's thesis, Georgia College, Milledgeville, GA.
16.
HansT. (2000). A meta-analysis of the effects of adventure programming on locus of control. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 30(1), 33–60.
17.
HattieJ. A. (1992). Enhancing self-concept. In HattieJ. M. (Ed.), Self-concept (pp. 221–240). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
HattieJ. M.MarshH. W.NeillJ. T.RichardsG. E. (1997). Adventure education and Outward Bound: Out-of-class experiences that have a lasting effect. Review of Educational Research, 67, 43–87.
19.
HeubeckB.NeillJ. T. (2000). Confirmatory factor analysis and reliability of the Mental Health Inventory for Australian Adolescents. Psychological Reports, 87, 431–440.
20.
ItinC. M. (Ed.). (1998, July). Proceedings of the First International Adventure Therapy Conference: Exploring the Boundaries. Camping and Outdoor Education Association of Western Australia, Perth, Australia. Boulder, CO: The Association of Experiential Education.
21.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment. American Psychologist, 48, 1181–1201.
22.
MarshP. E. (1999). What does camp do for kids? A meta-analysis of the influence of the organized camping experience on the self constructs of youth. Unpublished master's thesis, Indiana University, Martinsville, IN.
23.
NeillJ. T. (2002, January). Meta-analytic research on the outcomes of outdoor education. Paper presented at the 6th Biennial Coalition for Education in the Outdoors Research Symposium, Bradford Woods, IN.
24.
NeillJ. T.RichardsG. E. (1998). Does outdoor education really work? A summary of recent meta-analyses. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 3(1), 2–9.
25.
RichardsK. (Ed.) (in press). Therapy within adventure: Proceedings of the Second International Adventure Therapy Conference, March 20-24, 2000, Augsburg, Germany.
26.
RichardsG. E.NeillJ. T.ButtersC. (1997, January). Summary statistical report of attendees at the 10th National Outdoor Education Conference, Colloroy NSW, Australia. Canberra, Australia: National Outdoor Education & Leadership Services.
27.
RussellK. C. (2001). Assessment of treatment outcomes in outdoor behavioral healthcare. Technical Report 27, Idaho Forest, Wildlife, and Range Experiment Station, Moscow, ID. Retrieved December 1, 2002, from University of Idaho-Wilderness Research Center Web site: http://www.wrc@uidaho.edu.
28.
RussellK. C. (2002). A longitudinal assessment of treatment outcomes in outdoor behavioral healthcare. Technical Report 28, Idaho Forest, Wildlife, and Range Experiment Station, Moscow, ID. Retrieved December 1, 2002, from University of Idaho-Wilderness Research Center Web site: http://www.wrc@uidaho.edu.
29.
SmithM. L.GlassG. V.MillerT. I. (1980). The benefits of psychotherapy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
30.
VeitC.WareJ. (1983). The structure of psychological distress and well-being in general populations. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 730–742.
31.
WolfF. M. (1986). Meta-analysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
