The need for more methodologically sound research in adventure therapy (AT) is commonly discussed among AT professionals. Clearly, as the culture of the psychological community is increasingly influenced by both managed care and the movement toward empirically-validated treatments, the need for solid research in AT is becoming progressively more urgent. This article focuses on summarizing some of the necessary considerations for conducting outcome studies in AT from the perspective of psychotherapy outcome research. Specific suggestions for future design strategies that can be implemented in AT settings will also be discussed.
BanakaW. H.YoungD. W. (1985). Community coping skills enhanced by an adventure camp for adult chronic psychiatric patients. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 36 (7), 746–748.
2.
BandoroffS. (1989). Wilderness adventure-based therapy for delinquent and pre-delinquent youth: A review of the literature. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 377 428)
3.
BorkovecT. D. (1994). Between-group therapy outcome research: Design and methodology. In OnkenL. S.BlaineJ. D. (Eds.), NIDA Research Monograph #137, pp. 249–289. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Drug Abuse.
4.
BorkovecT. D. (1997). On the need for a basic science approach to psychotherapy research. Psychological Science, 8 (3), 145–147.
5.
BorkovecT. D.CastonguayL. G. (1998). What is the scientific meaning of empirically supported therapy?Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66 (1), 136–142.
6.
BorkovecT. D.MirandaJ. (1999). Between-group psychotherapy outcome research and basic science. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55 (2), 147–158.
7.
ChamblessD. L.HollonS. D. (1998). Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66 (1). 7–18.
DrebingC. E.WillisS. C.GenetB. (1987). Anxiety and the Outward Bound process. Journal of Experiential Education, 10, 17–21.
10.
EwertA.SibthorpJ. (2000). Multivariate analysis in experiential education: Exploring the possibilities. Journal of Experiential Education, 23 (2), 108–117.
11.
FryS.K.HeubeckB. G. (1998). The effects of personality and situational variables on mood states during Outward Bound wilderness courses: An exploration. Personality and Individual Differences, 24 (5), 649–659.
12.
GassM. A. (1993). Adventure therapy: Therapeutic applications of adventure programming. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall Hunt.
13.
GillisH. L. (1992). Therapeutic uses of adventure-challenge-outdoor-wilderness: Theory and research, 35–47. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Experiential Education.
14.
GillisH. L.ThomsenD. (1996). A research update (1992-1995) of adventure-based therapy: Challenge activities and ropes courses, wilderness expeditions and residential camping programs. [On-line] Available: http://fdsa.gcsu.edu:6060/Igillis/
15.
HattieJ.MarshH. W.NeillJ. T.RichardsG. E. (1997). Adventure education and Outward Bound: Out-of-class experiences that make a lasting difference. Review of Educational Research, 67 (1), 48–87.
16.
HerbertJ. T. (1998). Therapeutic effects of participating in an adventure-based therapy program. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 41 (3), 201–216.
17.
KazdinA. E. (1992). Research design in clinical psychology. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
18.
KelleyF. J.BaerD. J. (1971). Physical challenge as a treatment for delinquency. Crime and Delinquency, 17, 437–445.
19.
KelleyM. P.CourseyR. D.SelbyP. M. (1997). Therapeutic adventures outdoors: A demonstration of benefits for people with mental illness. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 20 (4), 61–73.
20.
Newes (2001). Predicting recidivism among juvenile offenders participating in an adventure-based therapy intervention. Unpublished dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University.
21.
TabachnikB. G.FidellL. S. (2000). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
