Naturalistic instruction procedures have broad philosophical and practical appeal and have been embraced with enthusiasm by many who teach about or practice early intervention. While there is general agreement that a number of intervention procedures may be characterized as naturalistic and there is empirical evidence to substantiate that many have been effectively applied, a number of research issues must be addressed if practitioners are to apply the results. Issues associated with definition of procedures (independent variables) and outcomes (dependent variables) confound the translation of research into practice. This article raises these issues and suggests guidelines for describing independent and dependent variables that might better enable practitioners to apply research in their work with young children with disabilities and with families.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alpert, C. L., & Kaiser, A. P. (1992). Training parents as milieu language teachers. Journal of Early Intervention, 16(1), 31–52.
2.
Bailey, E., & Bricker, D. D. (1985). Evaluation of a three-year early intervention project. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 5(3), 52–65.
3.
Bailey, D. B., & McWilliam, R. A. (1990). Normalizing early intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 10(2), 33–47.
4.
Barnett, D. W., Carey, K. T., & Hall, J. D. (1993). Naturalistic intervention design for young children: Foundations, rationales, and strategies. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 13(4), 430–444.
5.
Bredekamp, S. & Copple, C. (Eds.) Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs.Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
6.
Bricker, D. D. (1989). Early intervention for at-risk and handicapped infants, toddlers, and preschool children. Palo Alto, CA: VORT Corporation.
7.
Bricker, D. D., Bruder, M., & Bailey, E. (1982). Developmental integration of preschool children. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 207–222.
8.
Bricker, D. D., & Cripe, J. W. (1992). An activity-based approach to early intervention. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
9.
Bricker, D. D. & Gumerlock, S. (1988). Application of a three-level evaluation plan for monitoring children progress and program effects. The Journal of Special Education, 22, 66–81.
10.
Bricker, D. D., & Sheehan, R. (1981). Effectiveness of an early intervention program as indexed by measures of child change. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 4, 11–27.
11.
Brown, W. H., McEvoy, M. A., & Bishop, N. (1991). Incidental teaching of social behavior. Teaching Exceptional Children, 24(1), 35–38.
12.
Carta, J. J., Atwater, J. B., Schwartz, I. S., & McConnell, S. R. (1993). Developmentally appropriate practices and early childhood special education: A reaction to Johnson and McChesney Johnson. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 13(3), 243–254.
13.
Cavallaro, C. C., & Poulson, C. (1985). Teaching language to handicapped children in natural settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 8(1), 1–24.
14.
Cole, K. N. (1995). Curriculum models and language facilitation in the preschool years. In M. E. Fey, J. Windsor, & S. F. Warren (Eds.). Language intervention: Preschool through the elementary years (pp. 39–60). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
15.
Fox, L., & Hanline, M. F. (1993). A preliminary evaluation of learning within developmentally appropriate early childhood settings. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 13(3), 308–327.
16.
Halle, J. W., Baer, D. M., & Spradlin, J. E. (1981). Teachers' generalized use of delay as a stimulus control procedure to increase language use in handicapped children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14(4), 389–409.
17.
Halle, J.Marshall, A. & Spradlin, J. (1979). Time delay: A technique to increase language use and facilitate generalization in retarded children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 431–439.
18.
Hart, B. M. & Risley, T. R. (1968). Establishing the use of descriptive adjectives in the spontaneous speech of disadvantaged preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 109–120.
19.
Hart, B. M., & Risley, T. R. (1980). In vivo language interventions: Unanticipated general effects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 407–432.
20.
Hemmeter, M. L., & Kaiser, A. P. (1994). Enhanced milieu teaching: Effects of parent-implemented language intervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 18(3), 269–289.
21.
Hepting, N. H. & Goldstein, H. (1996). What's natural about naturalistic language interventions?Journal of Early Intervention, 20(3), 249–265.
22.
Kaczmarek, L. A., Hepting, N. H., & Dzubak, M. (1996). Examining the generalization of milieu language objectives in situations requiring listener preparatory behaviors. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 16(2), 130–167.
23.
Kaiser, A., Hendrickson, J., & Alpert, C. (1991). Milieu language teaching: A second look. In R. Gable (Ed.). Advances in mental retardation and developmental disabilities (Vol. 4, pp. 63–92). London: Jessica Kingsley.
24.
Kaiser, A. P. (1993). Parent-implemented language intervention: An environmental perspective. In A. P. Kaiser & D. B. Gray (Eds.). Enhancing children's communication: Research foundations for intervention (Vol. 2, pp. 63–48). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
25.
Kaiser, A. P., Hemmeter, M. L., Ostrosky, M. M., Alpert, C. A., & Hancock, T. B. (1995). The effects of group training and individual feedback on parent use of milieu teaching. Journal of Childhood Communication Disorders, 16(2), 39–48.
26.
Kaiser, A. P. & Hester, P.P. (1994). Generalized effects of enhanced milieu teaching. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 17, 1320–1340.
27.
Kaiser, A. P., Yoder, P. J., & Keetz, A. (1992). Evaluating milieu teaching. In S. F. Warren & J. Reichle (Eds.). Communication and language intervention: Vol. 1. Causes and effects in communicating language intervention (pp. 9–47). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
28.
Koegel, R. (1987). A natural language teaching paradigm for nonverbal autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 17(2), 189–200.
29.
Losardo, A., & Bricker, D. (1994). Activity-based intervention and direct instruction: A comparison study. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 98(6), 744–765.
30.
McGee, G. G., Krantz, P. J., & McClannahan, L. E. (1985). The facilitative effects of incidental teaching on preposition use by autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 17–31.
31.
Rogers-Warren, A., & Warren, S. F. (1980). Mands for verbalization: Facilitating the display of newly taught language. Behavior Modification, 4, 361–382.
32.
Santos, R. M., & Lignugaris/Kraft, B. (1996). Integrating research on effective instruction with instruction in the natural environment: A review of the literature. Manuscript submitted for publication.
33.
Schulze, K. S. (1989). Promoting social interaction skills of handicapped preschoolers through co-incidental teaching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utah State University.
34.
Schuster, J. W., & Griffen, A. K. (1980). Using time delay with task analysis. Teaching Exceptional Children, 22(4), 49–53.
35.
Stowitschek, J. J., Czjakowski, L., Rule, S., Striefel, S., Innocenti, M., & Boswell, C. (1986). Systematic programming of social interaction through coincidental teaching. Technical Report No. 23059. Logan, UT: Utah State University, Center for Persons with Disabilities, Outreach and Development Division.
36.
Warren, S. F. (1991). Enhancing communication and language development with milieu teaching procedures. In E. Cipani (Ed.) A guide for developing language competence in preschool children with severe and moderate handicaps (pp. 68–93). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
37.
Warren, S. F., & Bambara, L. M. (1989). An experimental analysis of milieu language intervention: Teaching the action-object form. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 448–461.
38.
Warren, S. F., McQuarter, R. J., & Rogers-Warren, A. K. (1984). Effects of mands and models on the speech of unresponsive language-delayed preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 43–52.
39.
Wolery, M., Doyle, P. M., Gast, D. L., & Ault, M. J. (1993). Comparison of progressive time delay and transition-based teaching with preschoolers who have developmental delay. Journal of Early Intervention, 17(2), 160–176.
40.
Yoder, P. J., Kaiser, A. P., & Alpert, C. (1991). An exploratory study of the interaction between language teaching methods and child characteristics. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 155–167.
41.
Yoder, P. J., Kaiser, A. P., Alpert, C., & Fischer, R. (1993). Following the child's lead when teaching nouns to preschoolers with mental retardation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 158–167.
42.
Yoder, P. J., Kaiser, A. P., Goldstein, H., Alpert, C., Mousetis, L., Kaczmarek, L., & Fischer, R. (1995). An exploratory comparison of milieu teaching and responsive interaction in classroom applications. Journal of Early Intervention, 19(3), 218–242.
