The purpose of this study was to provide state-of-the-art descriptive information regarding preparation needs, concerns, and perceived barriers to the use of assistive technology for young children with disabilities. Surveys were completed by 62 early childhood special education professionals in 2 southeastern states. The findings indicated that respondents had frequent and significant concerns about their knowledge and utilization of assistive technology. Furthermore, training areas were identified that address the concerns and barriers regarding assistive technology. Implications for preservice and inservice preparation, service delivery systems, and research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Batavia, A. I., Dillard, D., & Phillips, B. (1990). How to avoid technology abandonment. In H. J. Murphy (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Conference “Technology and Persons with Disabilities.” Northridge: California State University, Northridge.
2.
Batavia, A. J., & Hammer, G. (1990). Toward the development of consumer-based criteria for the evaluation of assistive devices. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 27, 425–436.
3.
Behrmann, M. M. (1995). Assistive technology training. In K. F. Flippo, K. J. Inge, & J. M. Barcus (Eds.), Assistive technology: A resource for school, work, and community (pp. 211–222). Baltimore: Brookes.
4.
Behrmann, M. M., Jones, J. K., & Wilds, M. L. (1989). Technology intervention for very young children with disabilities. Infants and Young Children, 7,(4), 66–77.
5.
Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (1992). Augmentative and alternative communication. Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults. Baltimore: Brookes.
6.
Blackhurst, A. (1988). Competencies in the University of Kentucky special education microcomputer specialist program. Paper presented at CEC/TAM Conference on Special Education Technology, Reno, NV.
7.
Blackstone, S. W. (Ed.). (1994, December). Augmentative Communication News, 7(6), 1–7.
8.
Brinker, R. P., & Lewis, M. (1982). Discovering the competent handicapped infant: A process approach to assessment and intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 2, 1–16.
9.
Burkhart, L. J. (1988). Using computers and speech synthesis to facilitate communicative interaction with young and/or severely handicapped children. College Park, MD: Author.
10.
Butler, C. (1988). High tech tots: Technology for mobility, manipulation, communication, and learning in early childhood. Infants and Young Children, 1, 66–73.
11.
Carey, D. M., & Sale, P. (1994). Practical considerations in the use of technology to facilitate the inclusion of students with severe disabilities. Technology and Disability, 3, 77–86.
12.
Cavalier, A. R. (1987). The application of technology in the classroom and workplace: Unvoiced premises and ethical issues. In A. Gartner & T. Joe (Eds.), Images of the disabled/disabling images (pp. 129–141). New York: Praeger.
13.
Council for Exceptional Children (CEC). (1994). CEC standards for professional practice in special education. Reston, VA: Author.
14.
Creech, R., Kissick, L., Koski, M., & Musselwhite, C. (1988). Paravocal communicators speak out: Strategies for encouraging communication aid use. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 168.
15.
Garland. C. W., & Linder, T. W. (1994). Administrative challenges in early intervention. In L. J. Johnson, R. J. Gallagher, M. J. LaMontagne, J. B. Jordan, J. J. Gallagher, P. L. Hutinger, & M. B. Karnes (Eds.), Meeting early intervention challenges: Issues from birth to three (2nd ed., pp. 133–166). Baltimore: Brookes.
16.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1990, PL 101–476. (October 30, 1990). Title 20, U.S.C. 1400 et seq; U.S. Statutes at Large, 104, 1103–1151.
17.
Inge, K. J., Flippo, K. F., & Barcus, J. M. (1995). Staff development for assistive technology personnel. In K. F. Flippo, K. J. Inge, & J. M. Barcus (Eds.), Assistive technology: A resource for school, work, and community. (pp. 223–243). Baltimore: Brookes.
18.
Inge, K. J., & Shepherd, J. (1995). Assistive technology applications and strategies for school system personnel. In K. F. Flippo, K. J. Inge, & J. M. Barcus (Eds.), Assistive technology: A resource for school, work, and community (pp. 133–166). Baltimore: Brookes.
19.
Kinney, P., & Blackhurst, A. E. (1987). Technology competencies for teachers of young children with severe handicaps. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education7(3), 105–115.
20.
Lahm, E. A. (1989). Technology with low incidence populations: Promoting access to education and learning. Reston, VA: Center for Special Education Technology.
21.
Margalit, M. (1990). Effective technology integration for disabled children. New York: Springer-Verlag.
22.
McNaughton, S. (1990). Gaining the most from AAC's growing years. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6(1), 2–14.
23.
Morris, K. J. (1989). Alternative computer access methods for young handicapped children. Closing the Gap, 7(6), 1–15.
24.
Morris, M. W. (1990). Assistive technology funding. A user-friendly workbook. Washington, DC: RESNA Technical Assistance Project.
25.
Parette, H. P. (1994). Assessing the influence of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices on families of young children with disabilities. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78, 1361–1362.
26.
Parette, H. P., & Angelo, D. H. (1996). Augmentative and alternative communication impact on families: Trends and future directions. The Journal of Special Education, 30, 77–98.
27.
Parette, H. P, Hofmann, A. & VanBiervliet, A. (1994). The professional's role in obtaining funding for assistive technology for infants and toddlers with disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 26, 22–28.
28.
Parette, H. P., & VanBiervliet, A. (1991). Rehabilitation assistive technology issues for infants and young children with disabilities: A preliminary examination. Journal of Rehabilitation, 57, 27–36.
29.
Phillips, B. (n.d.). Technology abandonment: From the consumer point of view.Washington, DC: Request Rehabilitation Engineering Center, National Rehabilitation Hospital.
30.
Research Triangle Institute. (1992). National evaluation of state grants for technology-related assistance for individuals with disabilities program, final report, Volume I: Evaluation findings and recommendations.Research Triangle Park, NC: Author.
31.
RESNA. (1989). Technology related assistance for individuals with disabilities. Summaries of successful grant applications awarded under P. L. 100–407. Washington, DC: RESNA Press.
32.
Robinson, L., & Rauschert, M. (1988). Computer technology as a tool for preschool handicapped children. Closing the Gap, 7(4), 26–29.
33.
Scherer, M. (1991). Assistive technology use, avoidance and abandonment: What we know so far. In H. Murphy (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Conference, Technology and Persons with Disabilities (pp. 815–826). Los Angeles, CA: Office of Disabled Student Services, California State University, Northridge.
34.
Scherer, M., & McKee, B. (1990). High-tech communication devices: What separates users from non-users?Communication Outlook, 12(1), 23–27.
35.
Technology-Related Assistance for Individuals with Disabilities Amendments of 1988, PL 100–407. (August 19, 1988). Title 29, U.S.C. 2201 et seq: U.S. Statutes at Large, 102, 1044–1065.
36.
U.S. Department of Education (USDE). Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (1996). Eighteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
37.
Wilds, M. (1989). Effective use of technology with young children. NICHY News Digest, 6–7.
38.
Wright, C., & Nomura, M. (1985). From toys to computers: Access for the physically disabled child. San Jose, CA: Author.
