The purpose of the current investigation was to assess the relationship between the integrity with which social skills interventions were implemented in early childhood special education classrooms and 3 factors: teacher ratings of intervention acceptability, consultative support for implementation, and individual child outcomes. Sixteen early childhood special education teachers were randomly divided into two groups: training only and training with consultative support. Each teacher selected 1 of 4 standardized intervention packages for implementation. Prior to implementation, teachers were asked to complete a survey questionnaire designed to assess their acceptability ratings for individual components of the intervention package. Children receiving intervention participated in free play sessions, structured play sessions, direct-instruction sessions, and role play sessions. Observational data collection techniques were used to assess the integrity with which intervention components were implemented and, following intervention, the social interaction behaviors of participating children. Positive correlations between intervention integrity and both overall amount of intervention provided and child outcome were found. Results also indicated that teacher ratings of intervention acceptability were weak predictors of subsequent intervention integrity and consultative support did not systematically affect intervention integrity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anastasiow, N. J. (1986). Development and disability: A psychobiological analysis for special educators. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
2.
Atwater, J., Carta, J. J., & Schwartz, I. S. (1991, May). Teachers' implementation of a program for promoting children's classroom survival skills. Paper presented at the Association for Behavior Analysis Conference, Atlanta, GA.
3.
Baer, D., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,191–97.
4.
Boruch, R. F., & Gomez, H. (1977). Sensitivity, bias, and theory in impact evaluations. Professional Psychology,8411–417.
5.
Calvert, S. C., & Johnston, C. (1990). Acceptability of treatments for child behavior problems: Issues and implications for future research. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology,1961–74.
6.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (1990). Making educational research more important. Exceptional Children,57102–107.
7.
Gresham, F. M. (1986). Conceptual issues in the assessment of social competence in children. In P.S. Strain, M.H. Guralnick, & H.M. Walker (Eds.), Children's social behavior, (pp. 143–180). New York, NY: Academic Press.
8.
Gresham, F. M. (1989). Assessment of treatment integrity in school consultation and prereferral intervention. School Psychology Review,1837–50.
9.
Gresham, F., Gansle, K. A., Noell, G. H., Cohen, S., & Rosenblum, S. (1993). Treatment integrity of school-based behavioral intervention studies: 1980–1990. School Psychology Review,22254–272.
10.
Guralnick, M. H. (1992). A hierarchical model for understanding children's peer-related social competence. In S.L. Odom, S.R. McConnell, & M.A. McEvoy (Eds.), Social competence of young children with disabilities: Issues and strategies for intervention (pp. 37–64). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
11.
Guralnick, M. H., & Weinhouse, E. M. (1984). Peer-related social interactions of developmentally delayed young children: Development and characteristics. Developmental Psychology,20815–827.
12.
Happe, D. (1983). Peer relations. In M. Heatherington (Ed.). Handbook of child psychology, Vol. IV. (pp. 103–196). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
13.
Hartup, W. W. (1983). Peer relations. In M. Heatherington (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. IV. (pp. 103–196). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
14.
Hartup, W. W., & Sancilio, M. F. (1986). Children's friendships. In E. Schopler & G. Mesibov (Eds.), Social behavior in autism, (pp. 61–80). New York: Plenum Press.
15.
Hops, H. (1983). Children's social competence and skill: Current research practices and future directions. Behavior Therapy,11329–344.
16.
Kazdin, A. E. (1980a). Acceptability of alternative treatments for deviant child behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,13259–273.
17.
Kazdin, A. E. (1980b). Acceptability of time-out from reinforcement procedures for disruptive child behavior. Behavior Therapy,11329–344.
18.
Kazdin, A.E. (1981). Acceptability of child treatment techniques: The influence of treatment efficacy and adverse side effects. Behavior Therapy,12493–506.
19.
Kazdin, A., Kratochwill, T. R., & VandenBos, G. R. (1986). Beyond clinical trials: Generalizing from research to practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice,17391–398.
20.
LeLaurin, K., & Wolery, M. (1992). Research standards in early intervention: Defining, describing, and measuring the independent variable. Journal of Early Intervention,16275–287.
21.
Levine, S., Elzey, F. F., & Lewis, M. (1969). California Preschool Social Competency Scale. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
22.
McConnell, S., McEvoy, M. A., & Odom, S. L. (1992). Implementation of social competence interventions in early childhood special education classes: Current practices and future directions. In S.L. Odom, S.R. McConnell, & M.A. McEvoy (Eds.), Social competence of young children with disabilities: Nature, development and intervention (pp. 277–306). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Co.
23.
McConnell, S. R. (1982). Identification of social skills for elementary school boys with handicaps. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Oregon.
24.
McEvoy, M., Odom, S. L., & McConnell, S. R. (1992). Peer social competence intervention for young children with disabilities. In S.L. Odom, S.R. McConnell, & M.A. McEvoy (Eds.), Social competence of young children with disabilities: Nature, development and intervention (pp. 113–134). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Co.
25.
McEvoy, M., Shores, R. E., Wehby, J. H., Johnson, S. M., & Fox, J. J. (1990). Special education teachers' implementation procedures to promote social interaction among children in integrated settings. Education and Training in Mental Retardation,25267–276.
26.
McKee, W., Witt, J. C., Elliott, S. N., Pardue, M., & Judycki, A. (1987). Practice informing research: A survey of research dissemination and knowledge utilization. School Psychology Review,16338–347.
27.
Neimeyer, J., Tapp, J., McEvoy, M.A., Ellis, D., & Wehby, J. (1988). GETDAT: A computerized system for conducting direct and continuous observation of interactional behaviors. Unpublished manuscript, George Peabody College of Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
28.
Neimeyer, J., Tapp, J., McEvoy, M.A., Ellis, D., & Wehby, J. (1989). ENTERACTION: A data analysis program for GETDAT. Unpublished manuscript, George Peabody College of Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
29.
Odom, S. L. (1988). Research in early childhood special education. In S.L. Odom & M.B. Karnes (Eds.), Early intervention for infants and children with handicaps: An empirical base, (pp. 1–21). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
30.
Odom, S. L., & McConnell, S. R. (1985). Performance-based conceptualization of social competence of handicapped preschool children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,41–19.
31.
Odom, S., McConnell, S. R., & Chandler, L. (1994). Acceptability and feasibility of classroom-based social interaction interventions for young children with disabilities. Exceptional Children,60226–236.
32.
Odom, S., McConnell, S. R., & McEvoy, M. A. (1992). Peer-related social competence and its significance for young children with disabilities. In S.L. Odom, S.R. McConnell, & M.A. McEvoy (Eds.), Social competence of young children with disabilities: Issues and strategies for intervention (pp. 3–35). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
33.
Odom, S., Peterson, C., McConnell, S.R., & Ostrosky, M. (1990). Ecobehavioral analysis of classroom settings that support peer social interaction of young children with and without disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children,13274–287.
34.
Peck, C. A. (1993). Ecological perspectives on the implementation of integrated early childhood programs. In C.A. Peck, S.L. Odom, & D.D. Bricker (Eds.), Integrating young children with disabilities into community programs: Ecological perspectives on research and implementation. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
35.
Pennypacker, H. S. (1986). The challenge of technology transfer: Buying in without selling out. The Behavior Analyst,9147–156.
36.
Peterson, C. A. (1989). Scale of Intervention Features. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
37.
Peterson, C. A., & McConnell, S. R. (1993). Factors affecting the impact of social interaction skills interventions in early childhood special education. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,1354.
38.
Peterson, L., Homer, A. L., & Wonderlich, S. A. (1982). The integrity of independent variables in behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,15477–492.
39.
Reimers, T., Wacker, D. P., & Koeppl, G. (1987). Acceptability of behavioral treatments: A review of the literature. School Psychology Review,16212–227.
40.
Wilbers, J. S., & Wolery, M. (1991, May). Manipulating procedural fidelity with the constant time delay procedure. Paper presented at the 17th meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Atlanta, GA.
41.
Witt, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (1985). Acceptability of classroom intervention strategies. In T.R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Advances in school psychology (pp. 251–288). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.
42.
Yeaton, W. H., & Sechrest, L. (1981). Critical dimensions in the choice and maintenance of successful treatment: Strength, integrity, and effectiveness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,49156–167.
