Abstract
This paper reports the results of 2 studies in which the relative effectiveness of classroom based language intervention models were examined. In the 1st study, a developmentally based language facilitation program was compared to a direct language facilitation program in integrated preschool classrooms for young children with developmental delays. In the 2nd study, the developmentally based model was compared to a program using both the developmental and direct methods during discrete time periods throughout the day. Results of both studies indicated that no program was better overall. Disordinal Aptitude x Treatment Interactions indicated that children benefited differentially from the interventions. The differential effects of intervention could be predicted by the child's language ability before intervention.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
