Validity of an Observation Screening Instrument in a Multicultural Population

Abstract

Due to the increase of linguistically and culturally diverse young children in our society, accurate screening for communication disorders is becoming increasingly difficult. The Davis Observation Checklist for Texas (DOCT) is an observational teacher checklist used to screen preschool children for communication disorders in Head Start programs in Texas. The goals of this study were to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the DOCT and to evaluate the concurrent validity of the DOCT with a multicultural population. Fifty-nine English-speaking children (20 Mexican American, 19 African American, 20 Anglo) were evaluated using an assessment battery that included the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities (1970), the Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation-Revised (1986), and an informal checklist to assess voice and fluency. Concurrent validity was evaluated by obtaining the percent agreement between the outcome of the assessment battery (administered by speech pathologists and graduate clinicians) and the DOCT (administered by Head Start teachers). Results of this study show the DOCT demonstrates adequate sensitivity (80%) and specificity (98%) values and agrees well with the criterion measure in identifying children with communication disorders in the 3 populations studied.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen, D.V. , & Bliss, L.B. (1987). Concurrent validity of two language screening tests. Journal of Communication Disorders, 20, 305–317.

Aram, D.M. , & Hall, N.E. (1989). Longitudinal follow-up of children with preschool communication disorders: Treatment implications. School Psychology Review, 18, 487–501.

Aram, D.M. , Ekelman, B.L. , & Nation, J.E. (1984). Preschoolers with language disorders: 10 years later. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 232–244.

Bailey, D.B., Jr. (1989). Assessment and its importance in early intervention. In D.B. Bailey, Jr. , & M. Wolery (Eds.), Assessing Infants and Preschoolers with Handicaps (pp. 101–144). Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Company.

Bickers, P.M. (1990). Demographic influences on American education. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.

Bliss, L.S. , & Allen, D.V. (1984). Screening Kit of Language Development: A preschool language screening instrument. Journal of Communication Disorders, 17, 133–141.

Bricker, D. , & Squires, J. (1989). Low cost system using parents to monitor the development of at-risk infants. Journal of Early Intervention, 13, 50–60.

Coplan, J. (1985). Evaluation of the child with delayed speech or language. Pediatric Annals, 14, 203–208.

Glascoe, F.P. (1991). Can clinical judgements detect children with speech-language problems? Pediatrics, 87, 317–322.

10.

Goldman, R. , & Fristoe, M. (1986). Goldman Fristoe Test of Articulation. Circle Pines, MI: American Guidance Service.

11.

Illerbrun, D. , Haines, L. , & Greenough, P. (1985). Language Identification Screening Test for kindergarten: A comparison with four screening and three diagnostic language tests. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 16, 280–292.

12.

Lichtenstein, R. , & Ireton, H. (1984). Preschool screening: Identifying young children with developmental and educational problems. Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton, Inc.

13.

Mattes, L.J. , & Omark, D.R. (1984). Speech and language assessment for the bilingual handicapped. San Diego: College-Hill Press.

14.

McCarthy, D. (1970). McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities. Cleveland, OH: The Psychological Corporation.

15.

Rescorla, L. (1989). The Language Development Survey: A screening tool for delayed language in toddlers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 587–599.

16.

Schetz, K.F. (1985). Comparison of the Compton Speech and Language Screening Evaluation and the Fluharty Preschool Speech and Language Screening Test. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 16, 16–24.

17.

Schwartz, A.H. , & Murphy, M.W. (1974). Cues for screening language disorders in preschool children. Pediatrics for the Clinician, 20, 717–722.

18.

Stoner, S. , & Purcell, K. (1985). The concurrent validity of teachers' judgements of the abilities of preschoolers in a daycare setting. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 421–423.

19.

Thal, D. , & Bates, E. (1989). Language and communication in early childhood. Pediatric Annals, 18, 299–305.

20.

Valencia, R.R. (1990). Clinical assessment of young children with the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities. In C.R. Reynolds & R.W. Kamphaus (Eds.), Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children: Intelligence and achievement (pp. 59–67). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

21.

Walker, D. Gugenheim, S. , Downs, M.P. , & Northern, J.L. (1989). Early language milestone scale and language screening of young children. Pediatrics, 83, 284–288.

22.

Wolery, M. (1989). Child find and screening issues. In D.B. Bailey, Jr. & M. Wolery (Eds.), Assessing Infants and Preschoolers with Handicaps (pp. 75–99). Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Company