Mothers' Perceptions of the Benefits and Drawbacks of Early Childhood Mainstreaming

Abstract

The possible benefits and drawbacks of early childhood mainstreaming were evaluated by mothers of both special-needs and non-special-needs children representing a large community-based sample. Separate groups were recruited to establish comparisons related to children with cognitive delays, communication disorders, physical disabilities, and those at risk. A sample of typically developing children was also included. Results revealed widespread support for the benefits of mainstreaming, particularly promoting the acceptance of children with disabilities in the community, preparing the child for the real world, encouraging learning to a greater extent, and providing opportunities for more interesting and creative activities. However, a substantial number of perceived drawbacks was also noted, especially in connection with the availability of special help, special services, and qualified personnel as well as concerns regarding rejection by peers. Findings related to drawbacks suggest parental views that might counteract perceived benefits and reduced confidence in mainstreamed programs. In general, mothers' perceptions of mainstreaming were similar across family demographics, child characteristics, and type of program placement. A major exception was children's behavior problems, in which mainstreaming was perceived to be associated with more drawbacks.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achenbach, T.M. , & Edelbrock, C. (1983). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist and Revised Child Behavior Profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.

Bailey, D.B., Jr. , & Winton, P.J. (1987). Stability and change in parents' expectations about mainstreaming. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 7, 73–88.

Blacher, J. , & Turnbull, A.P. (1982). Teacher and parent perspectives on selected social aspects of preschool mainstreaming. The Exceptional Child, 29, 191–199.

Buysse, V. , & Bailey, D.B., Jr. (1993). Behavioral and developmental outcomes in young children with disabilities in integrated and segregated settings: A review of comparative studies. The Journal of Special Education, 26, 434–461.

Carrow-Woolfolk, E. (1985). Manual for the Test for Auditory Comprehension of Language—Revised. Allan, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.

Green, A.L. , & Stoneman, Z. (1989). Attitudes of mothers and fathers of nonhandicapped children. Journal of Early Intervention, 13, 292–304.

Guralnick, M.J. (Ed.). (1978). Early intervention and the integration of handicapped and nonhandicapped children. Baltimore: University Park Press.

Guralnick, M.J. (1982). Mainstreaming young handicapped children: A public policy and ecological systems analysis. In B. Spodek (Ed.), Handbook of research on early childhood education (pp. 456–500). New York: The Free Press/MacMillan.

Guralnick, M.J. (1990). Major accomplishments and future directions in early childhood mainstreaming. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 10, 1–17.

10.

Guralnick, M.J. , & Groom, J.M. (1988). Peer interactions in mainstreamed and specialized classrooms: A comparative analysis. Exceptional Children, 54, 415–425.

11.

Hollingshead, A.B. (1975). Four factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript. Yale University, Department of Sociology, New Haven.

12.

Kontos, S. , & File, N. (1993). Staff development in support of integration. In C.A. Peck , S.L. Odom , & D.D. Bricker (Eds.), Integrating young children with disabilities into community programs (pp. 169–186). Baltimore: Brookes.

13.

Odom, S.L. , & McEvoy, M.A. (1988). Integration of young children with handicaps and normally developing children. In S.L. Odom & M.B. Karnes (Eds.), Early intervention for infants and children with handicaps (pp. 241–267). Baltimore: Brookes.

14.

Peck, C.A. , Carlson, P. , & Helmstetter, E. (1992). Parent and teacher perceptions of outcomes for typically developing children enrolled in integrated early childhood programs: A statewide survey. Journal of Early Intervention, 16, 53–63.

15.

Peck, C.A. , Odom, S.L. , & Bricker, D.D. (Eds.). (1993). Integrating young children with disabilities into community programs. Baltimore: Brookes.

16.

Reichart, D.C. , Lynch, E.C. , Anderson, B.C. , Svobodny, L.A. , DiCola, J.M. , & Mercury, M.G. (1989). Parental perspectives on integrated preschool opportunities for children with handicaps and children without handicaps. Journal of Early Intervention, 13, 6–13.

17.

Sparrow, S.S. , Balla, D.A. , & Cicchetti, D.V. (1984). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

18.

Turnbull, A.P. , & Blacher-Dixon, J. (1980). Preschool mainstreaming: Impact on parents. In J.J. Gallagher (Ed.), New directions for exceptional children: No. 1. Ecology of exceptional children (pp. 25–46). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

19.

Turnbull, A. , & Winton, P. (1983). A comparison of specialized and mainstreamed preschools from the perspectives of mothers of handicapped children. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 8(1), 57–71.

20.

Turnbull, A.P. , Winton, P.J. , Blacher, J. , & Salkind, N. (1982). Mainstreaming in the kindergarten classroom: Perspectives of parents of handicapped and nonhandicapped children. Journal of the Division of Early Childhood, 6, 14–20.

21.

Wechsler, D. (1989). Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence—Revised. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.

22.

Zimmerman, I.L. , Steiner, V.G. , & Pond, R.E. (1979). Preschool language scale (rev. ed.). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.