Teachers' Schedules and Actual Time Spent in Activities in Preschool Special Education Classes

Abstract

Preparing a schedule for classroom activities is an important component of most successful educational programs. However, such preparation is only as effective as its implementation in the classroom. The purpose of this study was to compare teachers' schedules of classroom activities and direct observations of children's actual participation in those activities. Schedules of classroom activities and direct observation of actual activities, using the Ecobehavioral System for the Complex Assessment of Preschool Environments (Carta, Greenwood, & Atwater, 1986) were collected in 24 early childhood special education classrooms. Although preschoolers with developmental delays generally engaged in activities that their teachers had scheduled, significant differences were found between the amount of time that teachers allotted for these activities and the amount of observed time that children engaged in the activities. More time was scheduled for play and self-care than was actually observed. However, children were obsewed engaged in transition and story for longer periods than had been scheduled by their teachers. Implications for classroom practices are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson, L.W. (1984). Time and school learning: Theory, research and practice. London: Croom Helm Ltd.

Bailey, D.B. , & Wolery, M. (1992). Teaching infants and preschoolers with disabilities. New York: Merrill.

Berliner, D. (1980). The teacher-as-executive: Administering a learning environment. Paper presented at the South Pacific Association of Teacher Education Conference, Perth, Australia.

Brown, W.H. , Fox, J.J. , & Brady, M.P. (1987). Effects of spatial density on three- and four-year-old children's socially directed behavior during freeplay: An investigation of a setting factor. Education and Treatment of Children, 10, 247–258.

Carta, J.J. , & Greenwood, C.R. (1985). Ecobehavioral assessment: A methodology for examining the evaluation of early intervention programs. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 5(2), 88–104.

Carta, J.J. , & Greenwood, C.R. (1989). Establishing the integrity of the independent variable in early intervention programs. Early Education and Development, 1, 127–140.

Carta, J.J. , Greenwood, C.R. , & Atwater, J.B. (1986). ESCAPE: Eco-behavioral system for complex assessments of preschool environments. Unpublished coding manual for observational system. Juniper Gardens Children's Project, Kansas City, KS.

Carta, J.J. , Greenwood, C.R. , & Robinson, S. (1987). Application of an ecobehavioral approach to the evaluation of early intervention programs. In R. Prinz (Ed.), Behavioral assessment of children and families, Vol. 3 (pp. 123–156). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Carta, J.J. , Sainato, D.M. , & Greenwood, C.R. (1988). Advances in the ecological assessment of classroom instruction for young children with handicaps. In S.L. Odom & M.B. Karnes (Eds.), Early intervention for infants & children with handicaps (pp. 217–239). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

10.

Greenwood, C.R. , Carta, J.J. , Kamps, D. , & Arreaga-Mayer, C. (1990). Ecobehavioral analysis of classroom instruction. In S. Schroeder (Ed.), Ecobehavioral analysis and developmental disabilities: The twenty-first century (pp. 33–63). New York: Springer-Verlag.

11.

Greenwood, C.R. , Delquadri, J.C. , Stanley, S. , Terry, B. , & Hall, R.V. (1986). Observational assessment of ecobehavioral interaction during academic instruction. In S. Newstead , S. Irvine , & P. Dan (Eds.), Human assessment Cognition and motivation (pp. 319–340). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Nijhoff Press.

12.

Hanson, M.J. , & Lynch, E.W. (1989). Early intervention: Implementing child and family services for infants and toddlers who are at-risk or disabled. Austin: PRO-ED.

13.

Heward, W.L. , & Orlansky, M.D. (1984). Exceptional children. Columbus, OH: Merrill.

14.

Montes, F. , & Risley, T.R. (1975). Evaluating traditional day care practices: An empirical approach. Child Care Quarterly, 4, 208–215.

15.

McDonnell, A. , & Hardman, M. (1988). A synthesis of “best practice” guidelines for early childhood services. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 12, 328–341.

16.

Odom, S.L. , Peterson, C. , McConnell, S.R. , & Ostrosky, M.M. (1990). Ecobehavioral analysis of early education/specialized classroom settings and peer social interaction. Education and Treatment of Children, 13, 316–330.

17.

Peterson, C. , & McConnell, S. (1990, May). An examination of the co-occurrence of teacher behaviors and child-child verbal interactions in regular and special education classrooms. Paper presented at the 16th annual Association for Behavior Analysis Convention, Nashville, TN.

18.

Quilitch, H.R. , & Risley, T.R. (1973). The effects of play materials on social play. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 575–578.

19.

Rogers-Warren, A. (1984). Ecobehavioral analysis. Education and Treatment of Children, 7, 283–303.

20.

Sainato, D.M. , Strain, P.S. , Lefebvre, D. , & Rapp, N. (1987). Facilitating transition times with handicapped preschool children: A comparison between peer-mediated and antecedent prompt procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 285–292.

21.

Shapiro, S. (1975). Preschool ecology: A study of three environmental variables. Reading Improvement, 12, 236–241.

22.

Smyth, W.J. (1984). Time, achievement and teacher development. In L.W. Anderson (Ed.), Time and school learning: Theory, research and practice. London: Croom Helm Ltd.