A within-subjects design was used to investigate the effects of adult interaction styles on infant engagement Three interaction style conditions were created, each of which differed in terms of the stimulation and responsiveness provided by one adult Nine infants of adolescent mothers were videotaped individually in all conditions while interacting with the adult Parent/Caregiver Involvement Scale ratings of the interactions indicate that the independent variable was successfully manipulated Infant engagement was measured in terms of percentages of time spent in each of six mutually exclusive engagement states. Infants in the contingently responsive, moderately stimulating condition spent more than half of their time in interactive forms of engagement Infants responded to the condition with a relatively unresponsive adult providing low levels of stimulation with large amounts of time spent unengaged or in object-focused engagement Results from the overly directive, highly stimulating condition were dominated by the engagement category of watching. Results and follow-up comparisons are discussed in terms of the reactivity of infant engagement to adult behavior and its relevance to interaction-focused intewentions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arco, C.M.B., & McCluskey, K.A. (1981). “A change of pace”: An investigation of the salience of maternal temporal style in mother-infant play. Child Development, 52, 941–949.
2.
Bakeman, R., & Adamson, L.B. (1984). Coordinating attention to people and objects in mother-infant and peer-infant interaction. Child Development, 55, 1278–1289.
3.
Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J.M. (1986). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Barnard, K.E. (1987). Paradigms for intervention: Infant state modulation. In N. Gunzenhauser (Ed.), Johnson & Johnson pediatric round table: Vol. 13. Infant stimulation: For whom, what kind, when, and how much? (pp. 129–136). Skillman, NJ: Johnson & Johnson Baby Products Company.
5.
Barrera, M.E., Doucet, D.A., & Kitching, K.J. (1990). Early home intervention and socioemotional development of preterm infants. Infant Mental Health Journal, 11(2), 142–157.
6.
Barrera, M.E., Rosenbaum, P.L., & Cunningham, C.E. (1986). Early home intervention with low-birth-weight infants and their parents. Child Development, 57, 20–33.
Belsky, J., Robbins, J., & Gamble, W. (1984). The determinants of parental competence: Toward a contextual theory. In M. Lewis (Ed.), Beyond the dyad (pp. 1–12). New York: Plenum Press.
9.
Bornstein, M.H. (1989). Between caretakers and their young: Two modes of interaction and their consequences for cognitive growth. In M.H. Bornstein & J.S. Bruner (Eds.), Interaction in human development, (pp. 173–196). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10.
Bornstein, M.H., & Benasich, A.A. (1986). Infant habituation: Assessments of short-term reliability and individual differences at 5 months. Child Development, 57, 87–99.
11.
Bromwich, R. (1978). Working with parents and infants: An interactional approach.Austin, Texas: PRO-ED, Inc.
12.
Bullowa, M. (Ed.) (1979). Before speech: The beginning of interpersonal communication.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cooper, C.S., Dunst, C.J., & Vance, S.D. (1990). The effect of social support on adolescent mothers' styles of parent-child interaction as measured on three separate occasions. Adolescence, 25, 49–57.
15.
Daniel, W. (1978). Applied nonparametric statistics.Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
16.
Dunst, C.J., & Snyder, S.W. (1986). A critique of the Utah State University early intervention meta-analysis research. Exceptional Children, 52, 269–276.
Farran, D.C., Kasari, C., Comfort, M., & Jay, S. (1986s). Parent/Caregiver Involvement Scale. (Revision of Parent-Child Interaction Scale, 1980, 1981, 1984). Available from Dale C. Farran, Department of Human Dev. & Family Studies, UNC-Greensboro, Greensboro, NC 27412–5001.
19.
Field, T.M., (1977). Effects of early separation, interactive deficits, and experimental manipulations on infant-mother face-to-face interaction. Child Development, 48, 763–771.
20.
Field, T.M. (1980). Interaction of high-risk infants: Quantitative and qualitative differences. In D.B. Sawin, R.C. Hawkins, L.O. Walker, & J.H. Penticuff (Eds.), Exceptional infant: Psychosocial risks in infant-environmental transactions.New York: Brunner/Mazel.
21.
Fleiss, J.L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd edition). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
22.
Fogel, A., Diamond, G.R., Langhorst, B.H., & Demos, V. (1981). Affective and cognitive aspects of the two-month-old's participation in face-to-face interaction with its mother. In E. Tronick (Ed.), Social interchange in infancy: Affect, cognition, and communication (pp. 37–58). Baltimore: University Park Press.
23.
Friedman, M. (1937). The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. Journal of American Statistical Association, 32, 675–701.
24.
Gusella, J.L., Muir, D., & Tronick, E.(1988). The effects of manipulating maternal behavior during an interaction on three- and six-month-olds' affect and attention. Child Development, 59, 1111–1124.
25.
Hart, B., & Risley, T.R. (1992). American parenting of language-learning children: Persisting differences in family-child interactions observed in natural home environments. Developmental Psychology, 28, 1096–1105.
26.
Haskins, R. (1986). Social and cultural factors in risk assessment and mild mental retardation. In D.C. Farran & J.D. McKinney (Eds.), Risk in intellectual and psychosocial development. (pp. 29–60). Orlando: Academic Press, Inc.
27.
Jones, H.A., & Warren, S.F. (1991). Enhancing engagement in early language teaching. Teaching Exceptional Children, 23, 48–50.
28.
Korner, A.F. (1987). Infant stimulation: Issues of theory and research. In N. Gunzenhauser (Ed.), Johnson & Johnson pediatric round table: Vol. 13. Infant stimulation: For whom, what kind, when, and how much? (pp. 88–97). Skillman, NJ: Johnson & Johnson Baby Products Company.
29.
Lamb, M.E., Morrison, D.C., & Malkin, C.M. (1987). The development of infant social expectations in face-to-face interactions: A longitudinal study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 241–254.
30.
Mahoney, G., Finger, I., & Powell, A. (1985). Relationship of maternal behavioral style to the development of organically impaired mentally retarded infants. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 90, 296–302.
31.
Mahoney, G. & Powell, A. (1986). Transactional intervention program A child centered approach to developmental intervention with young handicapped children (Monograph No. 1). Farmington CT: University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Pediatric Research and Training Center.
32.
McWilliam, R.A., Trivette, C.M., & Dunst, C.J. (1985). Behavior engagement as a measure of the efficacy of early intervention. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 5, 59–71.
33.
Mitchell, D.R. (1987). Parents' interactions with their developmentally disabled or at-risk infants: A focus for intervention. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 13, 73–81.
34.
Rauh, V.A., Achenbach, T.M., Nurcombe, B., Howell, C. T., & Teti, D.M. (1988). Minimizing adverse effects of low birthweight: Four-year results of an early intervention program. Child Development, 59, 544–553.
35.
Seifer, R., Clark, G.N., & Sameroff, A.J. (1991). Positive effects of interaction coaching on infants with developmental disabilities and their mothers. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 96, 1–11.
36.
Siegel, C.E. (1956). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences.New York: McGraw Hill.
37.
Snow, C.E. (1989). Understanding social interaction and language acquisition: Sentences are not enough. In M.H. Bornstein & J.S. Bruner (Eds.), Interaction in human development (pp. 83–103). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38.
Strayer, F.F., & Moss, E. (1989). The coconstruction of representational activity during social interaction. In M. H. Bornstein & J. S. Bruner (Eds.), Interaction in human development (pp. 173–196). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39.
Tamis-LaMonda, C.S., & Bornstein, M. (1989). Habituation and maternal encouragement of attention in infancy as predictors of toddler language, play and representational competence. Child Development, 60, 738–751.
40.
Tomasello, M., & Farrar, J. (1986). Joint attention and early language. Child Development, 57, 1454–1463.
41.
Tronick, E., Als, H., Adamson, L., & Brazelton, T.B. (1978). The infant's response to entrapment between contradictory messages in face-to-face interaction. Journal of American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 17, 1–13.
42.
Yoder, P.J., & Warren, S.F. (1993). Can developmentally delayed children's language development be enhanced through prelinguistic intervention? In A.P. Kaiser & D.B. Gray (Eds.), Enhancing children's communication: Research foundations for intervention. (pp. 35–61). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.
